ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Just heard MSP say...

    IT Discussion
    11
    41
    4.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DustinB3403D
      DustinB3403
      last edited by

      If we just upgraded 1 drive a month from 7200 RPM (4 disk RAID 5) to 10K drives and let it rebuild it would be so much faster....

      What the literal [moderated]!

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender
        last edited by

        LOL - did you read that on SW?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403
          last edited by

          No our MSP (who's onsite today) just said that!

          !!

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • hobbit666H
            hobbit666
            last edited by

            I don't see a problem. the logic is fine 10K is faster spinning than 7.2K. cut them some slack!

            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DustinB3403D
              DustinB3403
              last edited by

              It's degrading the array to rebuild it to move to faster disks.

              ... . . .....

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • dafyreD
                dafyre
                last edited by

                $5 says you lose another drive during the rebuild.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                • coliverC
                  coliver
                  last edited by

                  If I recall this isn't the first asinine thing this MSP has said done... why are you still paying them?

                  DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403 @coliver
                    last edited by

                    @coliver I don't have that choice, this isn't being done, but was "if we had done this....."

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch @hobbit666
                      last edited by

                      @hobbit666 said:

                      I don't see a problem. the logic is fine 10K is faster spinning than 7.2K. cut them some slack!

                      WTF kind of logic makes you think intentionally breaking and rebuilding a RAID5 array 4 times is a good thing?

                      DustinB3403D J hobbit666H 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        @JaredBusch said:

                        @hobbit666 said:

                        I don't see a problem. the logic is fine 10K is faster spinning than 7.2K. cut them some slack!

                        WTF kind of logic makes you think intentionally breaking and rebuilding a RAID5 array 4 times is a good thing?

                        I also did the math on this (because this unit is the one with the failed disk already) that we'd have a 27% chance of failure, just on a single repair, which is why we bought a new Synology with 4-1TB SSD in RAID 5.

                        And restored from backup to it.

                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • J
                          Jason Banned @JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          @JaredBusch said:

                          @hobbit666 said:

                          I don't see a problem. the logic is fine 10K is faster spinning than 7.2K. cut them some slack!

                          WTF kind of logic makes you think intentionally breaking and rebuilding a RAID5 array 4 times is a good thing?

                          If it was a RAID 10.. Maybe. RAID 5 No way in hell is this a good idea.

                          coliverC dafyreD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • coliverC
                            coliver @Jason
                            last edited by coliver

                            @Jason said:

                            @JaredBusch said:

                            @hobbit666 said:

                            I don't see a problem. the logic is fine 10K is faster spinning than 7.2K. cut them some slack!

                            WTF kind of logic makes you think intentionally breaking and rebuilding a RAID5 array 4 times is a good thing?

                            If it was a RAID 10.. Maybe. RAID 5 No way in hell is this a good idea.

                            I don't know, intentionally breaking an array seems like a bad idea to me regardless of RAID level.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                            • dafyreD
                              dafyre @Jason
                              last edited by

                              @Jason said:

                              @JaredBusch said:

                              @hobbit666 said:

                              I don't see a problem. the logic is fine 10K is faster spinning than 7.2K. cut them some slack!

                              WTF kind of logic makes you think intentionally breaking and rebuilding a RAID5 array 4 times is a good thing?

                              If it was a RAID 10.. Maybe. RAID 5 No way in hell is this a good idea.

                              Even RAID10, to me, that'd be a big maybe.

                              J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • JaredBuschJ
                                JaredBusch @DustinB3403
                                last edited by

                                @DustinB3403 said:

                                And restored from backup to it.

                                That is certainly the right way to do it.

                                DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
                                • J
                                  Jason Banned @dafyre
                                  last edited by

                                  @dafyre said:

                                  @Jason said:

                                  @JaredBusch said:

                                  @hobbit666 said:

                                  I don't see a problem. the logic is fine 10K is faster spinning than 7.2K. cut them some slack!

                                  WTF kind of logic makes you think intentionally breaking and rebuilding a RAID5 array 4 times is a good thing?

                                  If it was a RAID 10.. Maybe. RAID 5 No way in hell is this a good idea.

                                  Even RAID10, to me, that'd be a big maybe.

                                  Yeah I wouldn't do it but chances of failure would be pretty slim compared to RAID 5 especially.

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • DustinB3403D
                                    DustinB3403 @JaredBusch
                                    last edited by

                                    @JaredBusch said:

                                    @DustinB3403 said:

                                    And restored from backup to it.

                                    That is certainly the right way to do it.

                                    It was the only way, this same MSP wanted to initally copy from the existing unit. I told my boss, just restore from backup, and we can run xcopies to pull anything else over that isn't a part of the backup.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DustinB3403D
                                      DustinB3403
                                      last edited by DustinB3403

                                      Just as a follow up to this, our existing iSCSI device (as it can't act as a NAS) has had 2 of the 4 drives replaced already, and 1 of them was replaced with a Desktop drive......

                                      Seagate 1TB Desktop 7200 disk....

                                      Who the hell...

                                      coliverC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • coliverC
                                        coliver @DustinB3403
                                        last edited by

                                        @DustinB3403 said:

                                        Just as a follow up to this, our existing NAS has had 2 of the 4 drives replaced already, and 1 of them was replaced with a Desktop drive......

                                        Seagate 1TB Desktop 7200 disk....

                                        Who the hell...

                                        How did these people get hired originally? Friend of the owner?

                                        DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • hobbit666H
                                          hobbit666 @JaredBusch
                                          last edited by

                                          @JaredBusch said:

                                          WTF kind of logic makes you think intentionally breaking and rebuilding a RAID5 array 4 times is a good thing?

                                          Sorry should of added the [sarcasm][/sarcasm] tags and some similes (if they were working lol).

                                          As I side note I have done this 🙂 on my ReadyNAS with RAIDX replaced all 4 drives from 1TB to 1.5TB allowing rebuild between and it does work, just bum clenching while it rebuilds lol

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DustinB3403D
                                            DustinB3403 @coliver
                                            last edited by

                                            @coliver yeah I have no clue.... I had to update my last reply because this unit can't even act as a NAS.

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 1 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post