ServerBear Performance Comparison of Rackspace, Digital Ocean, Linode and Vultr
-
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
-
@travisdh1 said:
Edit: Never mind, don't have the IP address for the Linode.
It's already offline but I will get you a new one privately in a few minutes.
-
Will Mangolassi be moving to Linode?
-
@aaronstuder said:
Will Mongolassi be moving to Linode?
Nope Mongolassi doesn't exist!
-
@aaronstuder said:
Will Mangolassi be moving to Linode?
Yes, going to make an attempt of it.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
This was really interesting.
-
@wrx7m said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
This was really interesting.
Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.
-
@Dashrender said:
@wrx7m said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
This was really interesting.
Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.
Yeah, the scale here is crazy.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
@wrx7m said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Here is the blog response to that...
https://blog.linode.com/2016/01/29/christmas-ddos-retrospective/
This was really interesting.
Wow - this sounds nearly the same as the GRC DDOS attack, only on a HUGE scale.
Yeah, the scale here is crazy.
80 GB attack - damn!
-
@scottalanmiller I got busy and never got back to this.
I just cancelled the pings. here are the results.
64 bytes from 172.99.75.133: icmp_seq=34832 ttl=50 time=39.6 ms ^C --- 172.99.75.133 ping statistics --- 34832 packets transmitted, 20406 received, 41% packet loss, time 34860502ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 38.082/39.183/122.033/2.152 ms [root@keygen ~]#64 bytes from 108.61.151.173: icmp_seq=34830 ttl=54 time=49.9 ms ^C --- 108.61.151.173 ping statistics --- 34830 packets transmitted, 34821 received, 0% packet loss, time 34873888ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 45.852/47.901/842.335/7.692 ms [root@keygen ~]#64 bytes from 104.236.119.59: icmp_seq=34838 ttl=56 time=48.6 ms ^C --- 104.236.119.59 ping statistics --- 34838 packets transmitted, 34807 received, 0% packet loss, time 34890326ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 48.341/48.750/1051.915/5.427 ms, pipe 2 [root@keygen ~]# -
-
@aaronstuder that would be the Atom processor. Per thread performance is low. You get a lot of memory with that but not much CPU. Great for a lab. Much slower thread performance on physical than the VMs we are testing.
-
Linode is 5001.3 bogomips x 2 = 10,002.6
Scaleway is 4787.8 bogomips x 8 = 38,302.4
The C2750 is 85% more energy efficient than the Intel Xeon E5-2680 CPU.
In a data center with thousands of servers, that adds up quickly
http://www.cpu-world.com/Compare/900/Intel_Atom_C2750_vs_Intel_Xeon_E5-2680.html
-
have you looked at something like packet.net
-
@aaronstuder said:
Linode is 5001.3 bogomips x 2 = 10,002.6
Scaleway is 4787.8 bogomips x 8 = 38,302.4
You are comparing two cores to a full eight on a dedicated CPU. That the Linode is greater than 1/4 the bogomips when virtualized shows the difference.
And while yes, energy efficiency is important, so is largest scalable size and thread performance. Atoms are decent for certain workloads, but you need more of them to do it. But workloads for which Atoms are good, ARMs are better. So Atom often falls into a weird middle ground of "mostly only well suited for something that they are not ideal for."
-
@larsen161 said:
have you looked at something like packet.net
Decent looking product, but no RAID on their entry level. Really meant for DevOps only.
-
@scottalanmiller They have RAID.....
-
@aaronstuder said:
@scottalanmiller They have RAID.....
Not according to their price list. Only more expensive options begin to offer RAID.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@aaronstuder said:
@scottalanmiller They have RAID.....
Not according to their price list. Only more expensive options begin to offer RAID.
They are super pricey too... $300 a month, almost. Granted, that's their Type 1 system... I get half the CPU & RAM, but almost 10 x the storage for $25 a month through KimSufi.
-
@dafyre said:
I get half the CPU & RAM, but almost 10 x the storage for $25 a month through KimSufi.
Your still using that? How do you like it?
