ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    CAT6 End to End?

    IT Discussion
    13
    52
    9.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • wrx7mW
      wrx7m
      last edited by

      I use Cat6 here and the cable is a little thicker and the individual strands for the cable I get are 23 AWG so they are a little more work to crimp the RJ45 ends on because they don't straighten as easily as 24 AWG. Patching is just as easy as Cat5E.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • brianlittlejohnB
        brianlittlejohn @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        What is even "worse", if anything can be, is that the Cisco Platinum Partner host that was hosting the event decided to play along and not call their bluff and hope that the audience, which was all IT people, wouldn't notice!! That or they actually weren't aware of what a realistic lie about networking would sound like.

        I don't even want to imagine how much the Cisco router would be that could handle 14Tb/s ...

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @brianlittlejohn
          last edited by

          @brianlittlejohn said:

          @scottalanmiller said:

          What is even "worse", if anything can be, is that the Cisco Platinum Partner host that was hosting the event decided to play along and not call their bluff and hope that the audience, which was all IT people, wouldn't notice!! That or they actually weren't aware of what a realistic lie about networking would sound like.

          I don't even want to imagine how much the Cisco router would be that could handle 14Tb/s ...

          Hard to imagine Cisco ever being able to handle that. Ubiquiti will be doing 1Pb/s before Cisco figures TB/s out!

          wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
          • wirestyle22W
            wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said:

            @brianlittlejohn said:

            @scottalanmiller said:

            What is even "worse", if anything can be, is that the Cisco Platinum Partner host that was hosting the event decided to play along and not call their bluff and hope that the audience, which was all IT people, wouldn't notice!! That or they actually weren't aware of what a realistic lie about networking would sound like.

            I don't even want to imagine how much the Cisco router would be that could handle 14Tb/s ...

            Hard to imagine Cisco ever being able to handle that. Ubiquiti will be doing 1Pb/s before Cisco figures TB/s out!

            Ubiquiti gets all the street cred (and probably all the single ladies too).

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
            • J
              Jason Banned
              last edited by Jason

              We do all CAT6A here. Cable is fairly cheap.. It's the install that costs us.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • NattNattN
                NattNatt @MattSpeller
                last edited by

                @MattSpeller said:

                @NattNatt said:

                Company now uses all Cat6 - but I miss Cat 5e, was easier to run and terminate, easier to bend etc too...

                You won't miss 5e in a couple years when 10gig switching is dirt cheap

                No doubt...but we'll no doubt have re-run ALL the cables at least 3 times before then... 😉

                MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • MattSpellerM
                  MattSpeller @NattNatt
                  last edited by

                  @NattNatt said:

                  @MattSpeller said:

                  @NattNatt said:

                  Company now uses all Cat6 - but I miss Cat 5e, was easier to run and terminate, easier to bend etc too...

                  You won't miss 5e in a couple years when 10gig switching is dirt cheap

                  No doubt...but we'll no doubt have re-run ALL the cables at least 3 times before then... 😉

                  Hahaha I was going to say "or you'll have moved by then"

                  NattNattN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • NattNattN
                    NattNatt @MattSpeller
                    last edited by

                    @MattSpeller said:

                    @NattNatt said:

                    @MattSpeller said:

                    @NattNatt said:

                    Company now uses all Cat6 - but I miss Cat 5e, was easier to run and terminate, easier to bend etc too...

                    You won't miss 5e in a couple years when 10gig switching is dirt cheap

                    No doubt...but we'll no doubt have re-run ALL the cables at least 3 times before then... 😉

                    Hahaha I was going to say "or you'll have moved by then"

                    Apparently the boss is trying to procure the building that's opposite us, and plans to bridge across into that too...If we get it, it'll be awesome...but the company who own it are fairly massive, so we shall see....

                    MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • MattSpellerM
                      MattSpeller @NattNatt
                      last edited by MattSpeller

                      @NattNatt No worries there, just string cat6 through a couple windows, give it a tug to get the droop out 😉

                      NattNattN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • Mike DavisM
                        Mike Davis
                        last edited by

                        I'm running all CAT6 for premise wiring. I might still use some CAT5e patch cables, but those are easily enough swapped out. I have heard of some PoE+ cameras burning up when run over CAT 5 cable. I don't want to have to go and rewire a building because I saved a few bucks on the cable.

                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @Mike Davis
                          last edited by

                          @Mike-Davis said:

                          I'm running all CAT6 for premise wiring. I might still use some CAT5e patch cables, but those are easily enough swapped out. I have heard of some PoE+ cameras burning up when run over CAT 5 cable. I don't want to have to go and rewire a building because I saved a few bucks on the cable.

                          That is just a silly thing to say. PoE and PoE+ require, per the IEEE standard, category 5, but is still allowed to be ran on category 3 for lower wattage workloads.

                          A camera burning up would be more likely to have been caused by poor termination or damage to the cable when it was ran. Of course the wire could be bad internally, but in more than 7 years professionally installing alarm systems (some on ethernet) and another 17 doing network cabling intermittently, I have never had a box of bad cable. I am sure it happens, but I have never seen it.

                          J Mike DavisM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • J
                            Jason Banned @JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            @JaredBusch said:

                            @Mike-Davis said:

                            I'm running all CAT6 for premise wiring. I might still use some CAT5e patch cables, but those are easily enough swapped out. I have heard of some PoE+ cameras burning up when run over CAT 5 cable. I don't want to have to go and rewire a building because I saved a few bucks on the cable.

                            That is just a silly thing to say. PoE and PoE+ require, per the IEEE standard, category 5, but is still allowed to be ran on category 3 for lower wattage workloads.

                            A camera burning up would be more likely to have been caused by poor termination or damage to the cable when it was ran. Of course the wire could be bad internally, but in more than 7 years professionally installing alarm systems (some on ethernet) and another 17 doing network cabling intermittently, I have never had a box of bad cable. I am sure it happens, but I have never seen it.

                            Most manufacturs test the whole spool as one before it ships. I don't think I've ever seen bad cable either only bad termination or b damaged cable from installers putting too much stress on a cable.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • NattNattN
                              NattNatt @MattSpeller
                              last edited by

                              @MattSpeller said:

                              @NattNatt No worries there, just string cat6 through a couple windows, give it a tug to get the droop out 😉

                              That works with fibre too right? 😉

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • Mike DavisM
                                Mike Davis @JaredBusch
                                last edited by

                                @JaredBusch said:

                                That is just a silly thing to say. PoE and PoE+ require, per the IEEE standard, category 5, but is still allowed to be ran on category 3 for lower wattage workloads.

                                I haven't installed many PoE+ cameras and have only had those running less than a year. Do you have a number of PoE+ cameras running on CAT5? Longer runs? I'm wondering why the camera company I was dealing made such a big deal about 23 guage CAT6 for their cameras. Maybe because it had a heater?

                                JaredBuschJ wirestyle22W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • JaredBuschJ
                                  JaredBusch @Mike Davis
                                  last edited by

                                  @Mike-Davis said:

                                  @JaredBusch said:

                                  That is just a silly thing to say. PoE and PoE+ require, per the IEEE standard, category 5, but is still allowed to be ran on category 3 for lower wattage workloads.

                                  I haven't installed many PoE+ cameras and have only had those running less than a year. Do you have a number of PoE+ cameras running on CAT5? Longer runs? I'm wondering why the camera company I was dealing made such a big deal about 23 guage CAT6 for their cameras. Maybe because it had a heater?

                                  Possibly. What is the wattage draw on the unit?

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • wirestyle22W
                                    wirestyle22 @Mike Davis
                                    last edited by wirestyle22

                                    @Mike-Davis said:

                                    @JaredBusch said:

                                    That is just a silly thing to say. PoE and PoE+ require, per the IEEE standard, category 5, but is still allowed to be ran on category 3 for lower wattage workloads.

                                    I haven't installed many PoE+ cameras and have only had those running less than a year. Do you have a number of PoE+ cameras running on CAT5? Longer runs? I'm wondering why the camera company I was dealing made such a big deal about 23 guage CAT6 for their cameras. Maybe because it had a heater?

                                    You mean a heater as in a heating unit? I guess? A quality cat5e cable will tolerate temperatures from -4 to 167 degrees Fahrenheit. Keep in mind I run a lot of cabling for my company but I am by no means a cabling guru. Maybe they know something I don't. shrug

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                                      last edited by

                                      @wirestyle22 said:

                                      @Mike-Davis said:

                                      @JaredBusch said:

                                      That is just a silly thing to say. PoE and PoE+ require, per the IEEE standard, category 5, but is still allowed to be ran on category 3 for lower wattage workloads.

                                      I haven't installed many PoE+ cameras and have only had those running less than a year. Do you have a number of PoE+ cameras running on CAT5? Longer runs? I'm wondering why the camera company I was dealing made such a big deal about 23 guage CAT6 for their cameras. Maybe because it had a heater?

                                      You mean a heater as in a heating unit? I guess? A quality cat5e cable will tolerate temperatures from -4 to 167 degrees Fahrenheit. Keep in mind I run a lot of cabling for my company but I am by no means a cabling guru. Maybe they know something I don't. shrug

                                      He means a heater in the camera enclosure.

                                      NattNattN wirestyle22W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • NattNattN
                                        NattNatt @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        @wirestyle22 said:

                                        @Mike-Davis said:

                                        @JaredBusch said:

                                        That is just a silly thing to say. PoE and PoE+ require, per the IEEE standard, category 5, but is still allowed to be ran on category 3 for lower wattage workloads.

                                        I haven't installed many PoE+ cameras and have only had those running less than a year. Do you have a number of PoE+ cameras running on CAT5? Longer runs? I'm wondering why the camera company I was dealing made such a big deal about 23 guage CAT6 for their cameras. Maybe because it had a heater?

                                        You mean a heater as in a heating unit? I guess? A quality cat5e cable will tolerate temperatures from -4 to 167 degrees Fahrenheit. Keep in mind I run a lot of cabling for my company but I am by no means a cabling guru. Maybe they know something I don't. shrug

                                        He means a heater in the camera enclosure.

                                        Whats the point in that? I'm guessing reduce fog/ice etc?

                                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @NattNatt
                                          last edited by

                                          @NattNatt said:

                                          @scottalanmiller said:

                                          @wirestyle22 said:

                                          @Mike-Davis said:

                                          @JaredBusch said:

                                          That is just a silly thing to say. PoE and PoE+ require, per the IEEE standard, category 5, but is still allowed to be ran on category 3 for lower wattage workloads.

                                          I haven't installed many PoE+ cameras and have only had those running less than a year. Do you have a number of PoE+ cameras running on CAT5? Longer runs? I'm wondering why the camera company I was dealing made such a big deal about 23 guage CAT6 for their cameras. Maybe because it had a heater?

                                          You mean a heater as in a heating unit? I guess? A quality cat5e cable will tolerate temperatures from -4 to 167 degrees Fahrenheit. Keep in mind I run a lot of cabling for my company but I am by no means a cabling guru. Maybe they know something I don't. shrug

                                          He means a heater in the camera enclosure.

                                          Whats the point in that? I'm guessing reduce fog/ice etc?

                                          Yup.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • Mike DavisM
                                            Mike Davis
                                            last edited by

                                            yes, like this:
                                            http://www.axis.com/us/en/products/axis-q1604-e
                                            I should add I'm in upstate New York, so our winter may be different than yours..

                                            scottalanmillerS JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 2 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post