Installing PocketMine MineCraft PE Server on CentOS 7
-
Yeah, although that is partially because of the platforms that it runs on. Well hopefully, fingers crossed.
-
Just reporting back, no update as of today. 1266 is still the latest build.
-
I am attempting to keep very much on top of this as my daughters are quite anxious to be able to get back into their game world and keep playing. We were using the PE edition to play together as a family and losing connectivity really impacts them now
As of today, still no movement on a new build.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
I am attempting to keep very much on top of this as my daughters are quite anxious to be able to get back into their game world and keep playing. We were using the PE edition to play together as a family and losing connectivity really impacts them now
As of today, still no movement on a new build.
That's unfortunate. Can you play on the local worlds at all?
-
@coliver said:
That's unfortunate. Can you play on the local worlds at all?
Yes, the clients themselves still work. But the kids like playing with me in the same world, they don't really enjoy playing by themselves. They loved that it was a social, family thing.
-
@scottalanmiller Yea minecraft solo pretty much sucks.
Speaking of maybe you can setup a FTB Invinity Evolved server on that scale cluster
Maybe import a world and get things really flying. -
@coliver said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
The main developer behind Pocketmine was hired by Mojang not too long ago. I wonder how quickly they will be able to get the system updated.
Is he still allowed to work on it? Mojang are the ones specifically changing the code and, I assume, for the express purpose of making PocketMine have to work hard to keep things working. They could easily make this stable, but they don't.
From what I've read he is. Minecraft PE has rarely been friendly to the modding community though.
He's not even posted on the twitter feed about the issue. Total silence on all channels. I have a feeling he's not on the project any longer
Maybe he is just really busy, but seems suspicious that there isn't even a note saying he is aware of the issue. -
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
The main developer behind Pocketmine was hired by Mojang not too long ago. I wonder how quickly they will be able to get the system updated.
Is he still allowed to work on it? Mojang are the ones specifically changing the code and, I assume, for the express purpose of making PocketMine have to work hard to keep things working. They could easily make this stable, but they don't.
From what I've read he is. Minecraft PE has rarely been friendly to the modding community though.
He's not even posted on the twitter feed about the issue. Total silence on all channels. I have a feeling he's not on the project any longer
Maybe he is just really busy, but seems suspicious that there isn't even a note saying he is aware of the issue.I don't doubt that. It's unfortunate but it looks like the project may be abandoned. Looks like someone is updating their Github, but it hasn't been pulled into the master branch yet.
-
Looks like there are some unofficial patches.
https://forums.pocketmine.net/threads/pocketmine-mp-0-13-2.14980/
-
Maybe PocketMine is going to need to be forked.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Maybe PocketMine is going to need to be forked.
Sounds like it. I think it is PHP? So that shouldn't be too bad.
-
@coliver said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Maybe PocketMine is going to need to be forked.
Sounds like it. I think it is PHP? So that shouldn't be too bad.
Yes, it is PHP.
-
So forking PocketMine will what ? allow it to connect to the PE server version?
-
@Dashrender said:
So forking PocketMine will what ? allow it to connect to the PE server version?
There is a patch that has been submitted to solve this issue but it hasn't been folded into the master branch yet. Forking the project could incorporate that patch and ensure future development continues, if for instance the main dev decides to get out of the game and remove the project.
-
@Dashrender said:
So forking PocketMine will what ? allow it to connect to the PE server version?
PocketMine IS the server
Minecraft PE is the client.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
So forking PocketMine will what ? allow it to connect to the PE server version?
PocketMine IS the server
Minecraft PE is the client.
OH, thanks.
So forking it so that someone else can maintain it assuming that the original maintainer doesn't come back, is that right? -
@Dashrender said:
So forking it so that someone else can maintain it assuming that the original maintainer doesn't come back, is that right?
Right, that's the wonderful thing about open source. If the project goes stale, someone else can either take over as the direct maintainer OR they can fork the code and start a new project. There are active people trying to get it working right now, just not the official maintainer who now works for the company that the project was meant to work against. So forking it will allow the other people to keep submitting their updates and keep the project moving forward.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
So forking it so that someone else can maintain it assuming that the original maintainer doesn't come back, is that right?
Right, that's the wonderful thing about open source. If the project goes stale, someone else can either take over as the direct maintainer OR they can fork the code and start a new project. There are active people trying to get it working right now, just not the official maintainer who now works for the company that the project was meant to work against. So forking it will allow the other people to keep submitting their updates and keep the project moving forward.
Another advantage to open source!
-
The original developer for PocketMine has worked for Mojang for a year now and has continued to work on this project, just at a much reduced rate as can been seen in the contributors listing. You know, because he has a full time job too.
-
@coliver said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
So forking it so that someone else can maintain it assuming that the original maintainer doesn't come back, is that right?
Right, that's the wonderful thing about open source. If the project goes stale, someone else can either take over as the direct maintainer OR they can fork the code and start a new project. There are active people trying to get it working right now, just not the official maintainer who now works for the company that the project was meant to work against. So forking it will allow the other people to keep submitting their updates and keep the project moving forward.
Another advantage to open source!
Also a significant disadvantage when official projects don't keep some imaginary pace requirement. OpenSource can splinter too much.
