ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Turnkey Installs on CloudatCost

    IT Discussion
    cloudatcost
    7
    38
    6.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      Sparkum @A Former User
      last edited by

      @thecreativeone91

      Sorry all the RPM's?

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ?
        A Former User @Sparkum
        last edited by

        @Sparkum said:

        @thecreativeone91

        Sorry all the RPM's?

        RPM is RPM Package Manager (or was Redhat Package manager, now the name is kinda odd). It's install packages. The same thing you download when you use yum

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • S
          Sparkum @A Former User
          last edited by

          @thecreativeone91
          Ah gotcha thanks

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Not as bad as YUM! The Yellow Dog Update Manager! Yellow Dog has been gone for a decade!!

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • S
              Sparkum
              last edited by Sparkum

              On an unrelated (but semi) related note has anyone tried running Hyper V on one of their Big Dog servers?
              Does it actually allow you to visualize a virtual?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Reid CooperR
                Reid Cooper
                last edited by

                I haven't heard of anyone trying this yet. I can't imagine that that would work well.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  I concur, seems like that would be unbearable slow.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • Reid CooperR
                    Reid Cooper
                    last edited by

                    Seems like it would probably "work", but only as a technicality.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • S
                      Sparkum
                      last edited by Sparkum

                      Thanks for the input guys.

                      Bought a BigDog1 so gonna give it a try (even if I just end up using it as my website server)
                      It just finished installing server 2008r2 and all my network tests (in the portal) fail and I cant console in (again from the portal) so ticket opened lol

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • ?
                        A Former User
                        last edited by

                        KVM under linux is the only legal way to do it as you can't upload baremetal hyper-v.
                        It would be slow. And you still have them under one IP address as you only get one so you'd have to to NAT on the virtual NICs. Not really ideal.

                        scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @A Former User
                          last edited by

                          @thecreativeone91 said:

                          KVM under linux is the only legal way to do it as you can't upload baremetal hyper-v.

                          Xen would be legal and I think you can get that to work too. Xen will shim itself under a running install, so I bet you could get that to work. And it would potentially work in situations where HyperV would fail (lack of hardware virtualization support, for example.)

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @A Former User
                            last edited by

                            @thecreativeone91 said:

                            It would be slow. And you still have them under one IP address as you only get one so you'd have to to NAT on the virtual NICs. Not really ideal.

                            Pretty big limitation. Although I think that you can buy IPs one at a time as an add-on feature.

                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              Sparkum @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller

                              Ya 3 for $4/month or 6 for 7

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • ?
                                A Former User
                                last edited by

                                Not sure how they handle the 1:1 Nat mapping of those IPs at the OS level.. Or I guess they might just add a new Nic for each IP.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 1
                                • 2
                                • 2 / 2
                                • First post
                                  Last post