ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    [How to] Fail2ban on CentOS 7

    IT Discussion
    9
    24
    9.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ?
      A Former User @JaredBusch
      last edited by A Former User

      @JaredBusch said:

      @Dashrender said:

      Are you saying you need this at C@C because you don't have a hardware firewall?

      @coliver said:

      I think he is implying that since it is by default a public-facing computer, you should have as many layers of security on it as you can get.

      This. Firewall or not, because it is open to the public, it needs protection.

      On an internal system with no public access is simply not worth it on CentOS7.

      You can also disable root from logging in via SSH Just
      vi /etc/ssh/sshd_config
      And Change the PremitRootLogin yes to PremitRootLogin no

      This also disables the login via SCP of course

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • nadnerBN
        nadnerB
        last edited by

        Well, I've just tried it and I received an error when checking the status using fail2ban-client status sshd
        ERROR NOK: ('sshd',)
        Sorry, but the Jail 'sshd' does not exist

         
        This might just be due to my inexperience but I didn't receive any errors before that.
        Any ideas?

        ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ?
          A Former User @nadnerB
          last edited by

          @nadnerB It means the jail isn't setup. Go back over the text files you made with Vi in step 7 and step 5

          nadnerBN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • nadnerBN
            nadnerB @A Former User
            last edited by nadnerB

            Thanks @thecreativeone91
            A few quick edits of enable --> enabled and a restart of the service(?) and it's good to go.

            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • ?
              A Former User @nadnerB
              last edited by

              I wrote a script to do this.

              #!/bin/bash
              
              # CentOS7 Fail2Ban Install and Configure Script
              
              yum install -y epel-release fail2ban checkpolicy policycoreutils-python firewalld
              
              cat > /etc/fail2ban/jail.local << EOF
              [sshd]
              enabled = true
              EOF
              
              cat > fail2ban-syslog.te << EOF
              module fail2ban-syslog 1.0;
              
              require {
              type syslogd_var_run_t;
              type fail2ban_t;
              class dir read;
              class file read;
              class file open;
              class file getattr;
              }
              
              #============= fail2ban_t ==============
              allow fail2ban_t syslogd_var_run_t:dir read;
              allow fail2ban_t syslogd_var_run_t:file read;
              allow fail2ban_t syslogd_var_run_t:file open;
              allow fail2ban_t syslogd_var_run_t:file getattr;
              EOF
              
              checkmodule -M -m -o fail2ban-syslog.mod fail2ban-syslog.te
              semodule_package -o fail2ban-syslog.pp -m fail2ban-syslog.mod
              semodule -i fail2ban-syslog.pp
              
              systemctl start fail2ban
              
              systemctl enable fail2ban
              
              fail2ban-client status sshd
              
              echo Done!
              

              Anything I missed?

              DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DanpD
                Danp @A Former User
                last edited by

                @Aaron-Studer You left out the steps that create the sshd.local file. Was this intentional?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DanpD
                  Danp
                  last edited by

                  Seems like Fail2Ban stops logging after a log rotation. Anyone else run into this?

                  ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ?
                    A Former User @Danp
                    last edited by

                    @Danp said:

                    Seems like Fail2Ban stops logging after a log rotation. Anyone else run into this?

                    I don't think Fail2ban likes log rotate.

                    DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DanpD
                      Danp @A Former User
                      last edited by

                      @thecreativeone91 said:

                      I don't think Fail2ban likes log rotate.

                      Looks that way. I found this, but it's for an older version of both F2B and Centos.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DanpD
                        Danp
                        last edited by

                        Added "copytruncate" to the F2B logrotate configuration file and then ran a manual log rotation. Seemed to work ok (system is still logging to fail2ban.log), but I will continue to monitor.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • S
                          Sparkum
                          last edited by

                          When I do

                          fail2ban-client status sshd

                          I get

                          [root@dc fail2ban]# fail2ban-client status sshd
                          ERROR NOK: ('sshd',)
                          Sorry but the jail 'sshd' does not exist

                          When I check the audit logs I get logs....

                          DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DanpD
                            Danp @Sparkum
                            last edited by

                            @Sparkum What do you get when you enter the following?:

                            fail2ban-client status
                            
                            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              Sparkum @Danp
                              last edited by Sparkum

                              @Danp

                              [root@dc fail2ban]# fail2ban-client status
                              Status
                              |- Number of jail: 0
                              `- Jail list:

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DanpD
                                Danp
                                last edited by

                                Did you follow the steps and create the jail.local file?

                                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • S
                                  Sparkum @Danp
                                  last edited by

                                  @Danp

                                  Yep

                                  fail.PNG

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    Sparkum
                                    last edited by

                                    Noticed the problem happened below.

                                    Changed "enabled" to "enable" and looks like it works.

                                    Status for the jail: sshd
                                    |- Filter
                                    | |- Currently failed: 0
                                    | |- Total failed: 0
                                    | - File list: /var/log/secure - Actions
                                    |- Currently banned: 0
                                    |- Total banned: 0
                                    `- Banned IP list:

                                    Much appreciated thanks

                                    DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DanpD
                                      Danp @Sparkum
                                      last edited by

                                      @Sparkum That's strange, b/c I believe "enabled" is the correct entry.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • 1 / 2
                                      • First post
                                        Last post