ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Reconsidering ProxMox

    IT Discussion
    kvm lxc proxmox
    32
    241
    34.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • S
      scottalanmiller @jmoore
      last edited by

      @jmoore said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

      @black3dynamite Ok thanks. So it looks like another virtualization option. What advantages and disadvantages does it have with KVM?

      The only production virtualization platforms are ESXi, Xen, KVM, Bhyve, and Hyper-V. That's it. And Bhyve might as well not exist.

      All products on the market are these products. They may come in different packages, but at the end of the day, every solution is one of these.

      J M 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • M
        mroth911
        last edited by

        I have been trying ovirt, proxmox and now I am onto xcp-ng.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          JasGot @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

          The only production virtualization platforms are ESXi, Xen, KVM, Bhyve, and Hyper-V

          I've given up on Proxmox.

          What do you use to manage KVM? I know you've mentioned it several times, but I can't recall the name.

          S B 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • S
            scottalanmiller @JasGot
            last edited by

            @JasGot said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

            What do you use to manage KVM? I know you've mentioned it several times, but I can't recall the name.

            We were using virt-manager. But Cockpit will do the trick now in the latest release.

            What made you give up on Proxmox?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • B
              black3dynamite @JasGot
              last edited by

              @JasGot said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

              @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

              The only production virtualization platforms are ESXi, Xen, KVM, Bhyve, and Hyper-V

              I've given up on Proxmox.

              What do you use to manage KVM? I know you've mentioned it several times, but I can't recall the name.

              Virtual Machine Manager (virt-manager) and Cockpit. Using Fedora as your KVM host is the best choice if you want the latest version version of Cockpit. But Cockpit also doesn't provide a lot of configuration options like you can with virt-manager.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • M
                matteo nunziati
                last edited by

                Any update on this?! Never been exposed to proxmox and I'm curious!

                S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • M
                  matteo nunziati @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                  @jmoore said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                  @black3dynamite Ok thanks. So it looks like another virtualization option. What advantages and disadvantages does it have with KVM?

                  The only production virtualization platforms are ESXi, Xen, KVM, Bhyve, and Hyper-V. That's it. And Bhyve might as well not exist.

                  All products on the market are these products. They may come in different packages, but at the end of the day, every solution is one of these.

                  Don't forget openbsd:
                  (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq16.html)

                  S 1 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • B
                    black3dynamite @VoIP_n00b
                    last edited by

                    @VoIP_n00b said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                    @black3dynamite interesting. Have you used this?

                    The script works great.

                    And found a quick way to confirm if the hook script works after a Proxmox replaces proxmoxlib.js file.

                    apt --reinstall install proxmox-widget-toolkit
                    
                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • S
                      scottalanmiller @matteo nunziati
                      last edited by

                      @matteo-nunziati said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                      Any update on this?! Never been exposed to proxmox and I'm curious!

                      So far, we are liking it. It's still early, but looking good.

                      W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        scottalanmiller @matteo nunziati
                        last edited by

                        @matteo-nunziati said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                        @scottalanmiller said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                        @jmoore said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                        @black3dynamite Ok thanks. So it looks like another virtualization option. What advantages and disadvantages does it have with KVM?

                        The only production virtualization platforms are ESXi, Xen, KVM, Bhyve, and Hyper-V. That's it. And Bhyve might as well not exist.

                        All products on the market are these products. They may come in different packages, but at the end of the day, every solution is one of these.

                        Don't forget openbsd:
                        (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq16.html)

                        I HAD forgotten about that. Anyone ever tried it?

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                          1337 @matteo nunziati
                          last edited by 1337

                          @matteo-nunziati said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                          Don't forget openbsd:
                          (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq16.html)

                          That is bhyve I believe. Vmm is the kernel module of bhyve.

                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            scottalanmiller @1337
                            last edited by

                            @Pete-S said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                            @matteo-nunziati said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                            Don't forget openbsd:
                            (https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq16.html)

                            That is bhyve I believe. Vmm is the kernel module of bhyve.

                            Ah, that would explain why I didn't know about it 🙂

                            M 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • W
                              warren.stanley @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller - what storage options are you using with your testing?

                              S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • S
                                scottalanmiller @warren.stanley
                                last edited by

                                @warren-stanley said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                @scottalanmiller - what storage options are you using with your testing?

                                Local. Nearly all of our systems are stand alone, local storage.

                                W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • W
                                  warren.stanley @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  Are you using hardware RAID or ZFS? I'm interested as the Proxmox wiki doesn't encourage mdraid.

                                  JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • JaredBuschJ
                                    JaredBusch @warren.stanley
                                    last edited by

                                    @warren-stanley said in Reconsidering ProxMox:

                                    Are you using hardware RAID or ZFS? I'm interested as the Proxmox wiki doesn't encourage mdraid.

                                    Meh, I'm still not sure I would look at ProxMox because of all the shit like that over the years.

                                    But to answer your question, use hardware raid giving you blind swap to skip it mattering to the Hypervisor. That is the same decision no matter the hypervisor.

                                    Anyone that wants to manage the raid within the hypervisor is crazy. That never makes good business sense, IMO.

                                    W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • W
                                      warren.stanley @JaredBusch
                                      last edited by

                                      Yeah, Proxmox has been on the edge of my radar for years, occasionally I've run up a box to have a look at its progress - never keeping it for actual production use. I've hesitated revisiting recently, for concerns similar to what is echoed in this thread and other past experiences.

                                      CloudKnightC 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • CloudKnightC
                                        CloudKnight @warren.stanley
                                        last edited by

                                        I've been using proxmox for over a year now. I have read past threads and understand some of issues were not good but, the product itself is good. I wasn't too happy what happend with xencenter and it pretty much pushed everyone to use xcp-ng. Companies can be arses at times. look at some of shit Microsoft has pulled in the past.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • JaredBuschJ
                                          JaredBusch
                                          last edited by

                                          The only hold up I have is full backups. That is simply not practical for the real world.

                                          Sure, in a better world, state and data only make this better for many things, but even then, not all.

                                          But in the real world we have old bespoke software and a myriad of other poor practices that prevent moving businesses to a place where only full backups would be a valid use case.

                                          It is why I am still on Hyper-V + Veeam for clients.

                                          CloudKnightC S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • CloudKnightC
                                            CloudKnight @JaredBusch
                                            last edited by

                                            @JaredBusch I agree, I backup inside the VM. Yes not great and not as good as incremental backups from VM level.

                                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 8
                                            • 12
                                            • 13
                                            • 6 / 13
                                            • First post
                                              Last post