how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans

[JaredBusch]

@Dashrender said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

It sounds like your network looks like this

This sounds like exactly what he has.

@WrCombs said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

then chances are it's scanning the right PC and the fail is on the FW - right?

It is 100% impossible for a server on the public internet to scan through a NAT device without something else at play. WTF ever PCI scanner you are using on the internet is not seeing anything on the first internal network. Let alone anything on the double nat'd network.

[JaredBusch]

@Dashrender said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

@WrCombs The only thing the PCI firewall is doing is preventing the PC on 192 network from attacking it directly.

Correct

@Dashrender said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

Because it's on the 192 network, it could still act as a MiTM if it was able to shim its way in there.

Nothing on the 192 network can simply MiTM. You can easily pcap the data though.

You could then use the knowledge gained from that to spoof DNS or IP and then begin to get data with some sort of MiTM.

@Dashrender said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

So the PCI network is not as protected as it could be.

It is not secure at all. this is a 100% fail.

[JaredBusch]

@Pete-S said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

Or perhaps even better, the cable modem set to bridge mode and the 192.168.... connected as a second lan on the PCI firewall.

This is the only secure method.

You have to remove any network between the internet and the PCI firewall.

Note, you don't need VLAN. You can just use two ports like in my next post.

[JaredBusch]

Actual setup that I have at the site I am sitting at now.

Only device on PCI LAN

Firewall rules drop 100% traffic from LAN to PCI LAN and PCI LAN to LAN.

[JaredBusch]

Here is the config for that.

jbusch@fsl-stl# show interfaces 
 ethernet eth0 {
     address 12.XXX.XXX.XXX/30
     description "AT&T FIber"
     duplex full
     firewall {
         in {
             name WAN_IN
         }
         local {
             name WAN_LOCAL
         }
     }
     speed 100
 }
 ethernet eth1 {
     duplex auto
     speed auto
 }
 ethernet eth2 {
     address 10.202.8.1/29
     description "PCI LAN"
     duplex auto
     firewall {
         in {
             name PCI_IN
         }
         local {
             name PCI_LOCAL
         }
     }
     speed auto
 }
 ethernet eth3 {
     address 10.202.0.1/23
     description "FSL LAN"
     duplex auto
     firewall {
         in {
             name LAN_IN
         }
         local {
             name LAN_LOCAL
         }
     }
     speed auto
     vif 10 {
         address 10.202.10.1/24
         description "Guest Wireless"
         firewall {
             in {
                 name Public_WiFi_IN
             }
             local {
                 name Public_WiFi_LOCAL
             }
         }
     }
     vif 20 {
         address 10.202.11.1/24
         description "Security Cameras"
         mtu 1500
     }
 }
 loopback lo {
 }

 name PCI_IN {
     default-action accept
     description "Network for PCI Devices"
     rule 10 {
         action drop
         description "Block SMTP"
         destination {
             group {
                 port-group SMTP_Ports
             }
         }
         log disable
         protocol tcp
         state {
             established enable
             invalid enable
             new enable
             related enable
         }
     }
     rule 20 {
         action drop
         description "Allow access to gateway"
         destination {
             group {
                 address-group ADDRv4_eth2
             }
         }
         log disable
         protocol tcp
         state {
             established enable
             invalid enable
             new enable
             related enable
         }
     }
     rule 30 {
         action drop
         description "Block Access to LAN"
         destination {
             group {
                 address-group 10_0_0_0_8
             }
         }
         log disable
         protocol all
     }
 }
 name PCI_LOCAL {
     default-action drop
     description "Devices on PCI Network"
 }

 name LAN_IN {
     default-action accept
     description "LAN in to other interfaces"
     rule 10 {
         action accept
         description "Devices Allowed SMTP"
         destination {
             group {
                 port-group SMTP_Ports
             }
         }
         log disable
         protocol tcp
         source {
             group {
                 address-group Email_Servers
             }
         }
         state {
             established enable
             invalid disable
             new enable
             related enable
         }
     }
     rule 40 {
         action drop
         description "Drop all other SMTP"
         destination {
             group {
                 port-group SMTP_Ports
             }
         }
         log enable
         protocol tcp
         state {
             established enable
             invalid enable
             new enable
             related enable
         }
     }
     rule 50 {
         action drop
         description "Drop all to PCI LAN"
         destination {
             group {
                 address-group NETv4_eth2
             }
         }
         log disable
         protocol all
         state {
             established enable
             invalid enable
             new enable
             related enable
         }
     }
 }

[Dashrender]

Few if any consumer level firewalls will provide the split like Jared is showing.

But a super cheap ER-X from Ubiquiti can do this very easily, as Jared's examples show.

[scotth]

I think that there's one more way. One firewall per network, both through the cable modem/router. Each is responsible for their own security. Any backoffice access is governed by the payment processor and security for the payment/processing side is provided by the payment processor.

[Dashrender]

@scotth said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

I think that there's one more way. One firewall per network, both through the cable modem/router. Each is responsible for their own security. Any backoffice access is governed by the payment processor and security for the payment/processing side is provided by the payment processor.

This assumes you can get two ip from the isp.

[scotth]

@Dashrender said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

@scotth said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

I think that there's one more way. One firewall per network, both through the cable modem/router. Each is responsible for their own security. Any backoffice access is governed by the payment processor and security for the payment/processing side is provided by the payment processor.

This assumes you can get two ip from the isp.

You could also put one firewall behind the other. This happens a lot. The idea is to get the transaction(s) secure and to make absolutely sure that the PCI compliance is on the shoulders of the payment processor as much as possible. Audits are their responsibility. Remediation is their responsibility. Secure transactions are their responsibility.

EDIT: This does not exclude you (meaning anyone) from properly securing your own environment. Put the onus where it belongs.

[brandon220]

@JaredBusch example also is great for home use if you have IoT devices. I have an ERL behind a cable modem and this keeps everything I want separated from my normal LAN.

[JaredBusch]

@brandon220 said in how does this work? Modems/IPs/PCI Scans:

@JaredBusch example also is great for home use if you have IoT devices. I have an ERL behind a cable modem and this keeps everything I want separated from my normal LAN.

That is a good way to practice this for business use