ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    NAS for file server backup

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    39 Posts 10 Posters 2.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said in NAS for file server backup:

      @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

      @scottalanmiller said in NAS for file server backup:

      Not really, you can get a decent NAS for $250 at a minimum. I have one right here. Works like a champ.

      What model is this ?

      Whatever their two bay starter model is. Been a while since I bought one, the two that I have just keep running.

      Quick Amazon result for reference.
      0_1534283749751_edadaf80-a89d-468f-80e8-3bf7bb87323e-image.png

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
        last edited by

        @jaredbusch and that's Synology. Last time I priced it out (which was some time ago) the ReadyNAS were cheaper in this small end range.

        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch
          last edited by

          Found a better choice.
          0_1534283811051_e75efa3b-63f7-4f6a-b752-187143465e7e-image.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in NAS for file server backup:

            @jaredbusch and that's Synology. Last time I priced it out (which was some time ago) the ReadyNAS were cheaper in this small end range.

            ReadyNAS
            0_1534283855331_eb9cd45b-ff33-470a-b5bc-ae2b5d9113b2-image.png

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • FATeknollogeeF
              FATeknollogee
              last edited by

              Personal choice, I prefer rackmount!

              JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @FATeknollogee
                last edited by

                @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                Personal choice, I prefer rackmount!

                Not going to pay the premium for that on a basic NAS without a reason.

                FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • FATeknollogeeF
                  FATeknollogee
                  last edited by

                  Anyone tried http://rockstor.com/

                  JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • FATeknollogeeF
                    FATeknollogee @JaredBusch
                    last edited by

                    @jaredbusch said in NAS for file server backup:

                    @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                    Personal choice, I prefer rackmount!

                    Not going to pay the premium for that on a basic NAS without a reason.

                    I hear ya but all my gear is in a rack!

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch @FATeknollogee
                      last edited by

                      @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                      Anyone tried http://rockstor.com/

                      SF? Really? What is this 2001? No thanks.
                      0_1534284026826_798f09f7-2d76-4031-9a89-1884041aa949-image.png

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                        last edited by

                        @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                        Personal choice, I prefer rackmount!

                        That'll rack up a lot more costs, no matter what, and eliminated the desktop approach, too.

                        B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                          last edited by

                          @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                          Anyone tried http://rockstor.com/

                          That stuff is expensive and mostly junk. It's based on designed not meant for SMB use and is not well suited to being shoehorned in where it doesn't fit. I've supported companies that got screwed buying this stuff.

                          FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                            last edited by

                            @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                            @jaredbusch said in NAS for file server backup:

                            @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                            Personal choice, I prefer rackmount!

                            Not going to pay the premium for that on a basic NAS without a reason.

                            I hear ya but all my gear is in a rack!

                            You CAN just get a shelf. If you want a NAS, ReadyNAS and Synology allow you to pay for rack mount form factors. Still worlds cheaper than Rockstor and actual NAS. Rockstor is nothing, just consumer grade rack mount gear that you build your own "server" on. Better to go with a real server.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • FATeknollogeeF
                              FATeknollogee @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in NAS for file server backup:

                              @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                              Anyone tried http://rockstor.com/

                              That stuff is expensive and mostly junk. It's based on designed not meant for SMB use and is not well suited to being shoehorned in where it doesn't fit. I've supported companies that got screwed buying this stuff.

                              Rockstor is NAS software based on CentOS?

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                                last edited by

                                @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                                Rockstor is NAS software based on CentOS?

                                "NAS Software" has no place, anywhere. This is a fundamentally flawed software category. By definition, it is not business ready. The fundamental purpose of NAS Software means that it's not used in serious setups and this leads to endless problems.

                                No matter what it is based on, it would be better to just use that thing. NAS Software all takes something decent, and makes it worse (slower, riskier, more dangerous, more effort) and often doesn't start with a good base - you'd not use CentOS or BtrFS for a normal file server, why would it be okay when put into something incorrectly called a NAS and crippled? Never, that's when.

                                Read: The Jurassic Park Effect

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • B
                                  bnrstnr @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in NAS for file server backup:

                                  @fateknollogee said in NAS for file server backup:

                                  Personal choice, I prefer rackmount!

                                  That'll rack up a lot more costs, no matter what, and eliminated the desktop approach, too.

                                  $250 premium for a little extra processor. No thanks. We racked our 4-bay desktop FF Synology on a shelf and it looks just fine, not that looks matter at all anyway.

                                  QZ75fLj.png

                                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @bnrstnr
                                    last edited by

                                    @bnrstnr yeah, the price premium for the form factor tends to be nuts. Double the cost sometimes, just to make it look nice in a rack! Maybe if it was customer facing in some way, but not for normal use. And often there are other things that need to be on a rack shelf, anyway. Put them all together on one.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • 1
                                    • 2
                                    • 2 / 2
                                    • First post
                                      Last post