ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Fedora 27: dnf package question

    IT Discussion
    fedora 27 dnf package manager
    4
    17
    1.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • black3dynamiteB
      black3dynamite @Obsolesce
      last edited by

      @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

      @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

      I install Fedora 27 (using the DVD iso), cockpit is installed by default.
      I run "dnf upgrade"...server updates, I reboot, all is good.

      Sometimes, the "RPM" version of Cockpit here http://cockpit-project.org/blog/ is newer than the "packaged" version.
      Is it a good/bad idea to "manually" install the newer version via RPM?

      Even though Cockpit is installed by default, I still run dnf install cockpit, which gives you the full current version with included addins.

      But doesn't that installs plugins like docker, which you can't be used anyway since docker isn't installed by default?

      ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • ObsolesceO
        Obsolesce @FATeknollogee
        last edited by

        @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

        @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

        Even though Cockpit is installed by default, I still run dnf install cockpit, which gives you the full current version with included addins.

        Good idea, I wasn't doing that!

        You can also do a dnf search cockpit to see the possible addons you can install with cockpit.

        On a KVM hypervisor, I install dnf install cockpit-machines.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • ObsolesceO
          Obsolesce @black3dynamite
          last edited by

          @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

          @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

          @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

          I install Fedora 27 (using the DVD iso), cockpit is installed by default.
          I run "dnf upgrade"...server updates, I reboot, all is good.

          Sometimes, the "RPM" version of Cockpit here http://cockpit-project.org/blog/ is newer than the "packaged" version.
          Is it a good/bad idea to "manually" install the newer version via RPM?

          Even though Cockpit is installed by default, I still run dnf install cockpit, which gives you the full current version with included addins.

          But doesn't that installs plugins like docker, which you can't be used anyway since docker isn't installed by default?

          dnf remove cockpit-docker solves that.

          black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • black3dynamiteB
            black3dynamite @Obsolesce
            last edited by

            @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

            @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

            @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

            @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

            I install Fedora 27 (using the DVD iso), cockpit is installed by default.
            I run "dnf upgrade"...server updates, I reboot, all is good.

            Sometimes, the "RPM" version of Cockpit here http://cockpit-project.org/blog/ is newer than the "packaged" version.
            Is it a good/bad idea to "manually" install the newer version via RPM?

            Even though Cockpit is installed by default, I still run dnf install cockpit, which gives you the full current version with included addins.

            But doesn't that installs plugins like docker, which you can't be used anyway since docker isn't installed by default?

            dnf remove cockpit-docker solves that.

            If that's the case, why not install the plugins you need instead of going backwards and start removing plugins you don't need?

            ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ObsolesceO
              Obsolesce @black3dynamite
              last edited by

              @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

              @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

              @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

              @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

              @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

              I install Fedora 27 (using the DVD iso), cockpit is installed by default.
              I run "dnf upgrade"...server updates, I reboot, all is good.

              Sometimes, the "RPM" version of Cockpit here http://cockpit-project.org/blog/ is newer than the "packaged" version.
              Is it a good/bad idea to "manually" install the newer version via RPM?

              Even though Cockpit is installed by default, I still run dnf install cockpit, which gives you the full current version with included addins.

              But doesn't that installs plugins like docker, which you can't be used anyway since docker isn't installed by default?

              dnf remove cockpit-docker solves that.

              If that's the case, why not install the plugins you need instead of going backwards and start removing plugins you don't need?

              Because it doesn't just install plugins. It installs a difference version of Cockpit, the correct and current version. But it also installs the docker plugin, which i really don't care about and just leave it. I don't uninstall that. It was a suggestion for you if it bothers you.

              black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • black3dynamiteB
                black3dynamite @Obsolesce
                last edited by

                @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                I install Fedora 27 (using the DVD iso), cockpit is installed by default.
                I run "dnf upgrade"...server updates, I reboot, all is good.

                Sometimes, the "RPM" version of Cockpit here http://cockpit-project.org/blog/ is newer than the "packaged" version.
                Is it a good/bad idea to "manually" install the newer version via RPM?

                Even though Cockpit is installed by default, I still run dnf install cockpit, which gives you the full current version with included addins.

                But doesn't that installs plugins like docker, which you can't be used anyway since docker isn't installed by default?

                dnf remove cockpit-docker solves that.

                If that's the case, why not install the plugins you need instead of going backwards and start removing plugins you don't need?

                Because it doesn't just install plugins. It installs a difference version of Cockpit, the correct and current version. But it also installs the docker plugin, which i really don't care about and just leave it. I don't uninstall that. It was a suggestion for you if it bothers you.

                Do you know if the latest version of cockpit gets installed when using the netinstall instead of DVD?

                FATeknollogeeF ObsolesceO 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • FATeknollogeeF
                  FATeknollogee @black3dynamite
                  last edited by FATeknollogee

                  @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                  Do you know if the latest version of cockpit gets installed when using the netinstall instead of DVD?

                  IIRC, Cockpit does not get installed if you use netinstall iso.

                  black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • black3dynamiteB
                    black3dynamite @FATeknollogee
                    last edited by

                    @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                    @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                    Do you know if the latest version of cockpit gets installed when using the netinstall instead of DVD?

                    IIRC, Cockpit is not installed if you use netinstall iso.

                    You're right. I was thinking if you select Fedora Server Edition using the netinstall, it should install the latest cockpit version.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • ObsolesceO
                      Obsolesce @black3dynamite
                      last edited by Obsolesce

                      @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                      @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                      @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                      @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                      @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                      @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                      @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                      I install Fedora 27 (using the DVD iso), cockpit is installed by default.
                      I run "dnf upgrade"...server updates, I reboot, all is good.

                      Sometimes, the "RPM" version of Cockpit here http://cockpit-project.org/blog/ is newer than the "packaged" version.
                      Is it a good/bad idea to "manually" install the newer version via RPM?

                      Even though Cockpit is installed by default, I still run dnf install cockpit, which gives you the full current version with included addins.

                      But doesn't that installs plugins like docker, which you can't be used anyway since docker isn't installed by default?

                      dnf remove cockpit-docker solves that.

                      If that's the case, why not install the plugins you need instead of going backwards and start removing plugins you don't need?

                      Because it doesn't just install plugins. It installs a difference version of Cockpit, the correct and current version. But it also installs the docker plugin, which i really don't care about and just leave it. I don't uninstall that. It was a suggestion for you if it bothers you.

                      Do you know if the latest version of cockpit gets installed when using the netinstall instead of DVD?

                      Cockpit installs if you select the regular server install. It does not if you select "minimal".

                      But no, not the latest version. You always gotta do a dnf install cockpit to get the correct one.

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @Obsolesce
                        last edited by

                        @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                        @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                        @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                        @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                        @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                        @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                        @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                        @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                        I install Fedora 27 (using the DVD iso), cockpit is installed by default.
                        I run "dnf upgrade"...server updates, I reboot, all is good.

                        Sometimes, the "RPM" version of Cockpit here http://cockpit-project.org/blog/ is newer than the "packaged" version.
                        Is it a good/bad idea to "manually" install the newer version via RPM?

                        Even though Cockpit is installed by default, I still run dnf install cockpit, which gives you the full current version with included addins.

                        But doesn't that installs plugins like docker, which you can't be used anyway since docker isn't installed by default?

                        dnf remove cockpit-docker solves that.

                        If that's the case, why not install the plugins you need instead of going backwards and start removing plugins you don't need?

                        Because it doesn't just install plugins. It installs a difference version of Cockpit, the correct and current version. But it also installs the docker plugin, which i really don't care about and just leave it. I don't uninstall that. It was a suggestion for you if it bothers you.

                        Do you know if the latest version of cockpit gets installed when using the netinstall instead of DVD?

                        Cockpit installs if you select the regular server install. It does not if you select "minimal".

                        But no, not the latest version. You always gotta do a dnf install cockpit to get the correct one.

                        Are you sure? Because the netinstall has nearly nothing included on the local media. The install process pulls them from the repos.

                        ObsolesceO 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • ObsolesceO
                          Obsolesce @JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          @jaredbusch said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                          @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                          @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                          @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                          @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                          @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                          @black3dynamite said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                          @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                          @fateknollogee said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                          I install Fedora 27 (using the DVD iso), cockpit is installed by default.
                          I run "dnf upgrade"...server updates, I reboot, all is good.

                          Sometimes, the "RPM" version of Cockpit here http://cockpit-project.org/blog/ is newer than the "packaged" version.
                          Is it a good/bad idea to "manually" install the newer version via RPM?

                          Even though Cockpit is installed by default, I still run dnf install cockpit, which gives you the full current version with included addins.

                          But doesn't that installs plugins like docker, which you can't be used anyway since docker isn't installed by default?

                          dnf remove cockpit-docker solves that.

                          If that's the case, why not install the plugins you need instead of going backwards and start removing plugins you don't need?

                          Because it doesn't just install plugins. It installs a difference version of Cockpit, the correct and current version. But it also installs the docker plugin, which i really don't care about and just leave it. I don't uninstall that. It was a suggestion for you if it bothers you.

                          Do you know if the latest version of cockpit gets installed when using the netinstall instead of DVD?

                          Cockpit installs if you select the regular server install. It does not if you select "minimal".

                          But no, not the latest version. You always gotta do a dnf install cockpit to get the correct one.

                          Are you sure? Because the netinstall has nearly nothing included on the local media. The install process pulls them from the repos.

                          Netinstall installs the packages depending on which option you select. If you select "Minimal Install", you get nothing. If you select "Server Install" (forget what it's called exactly, but it's the one under Minimal Install), you get Cockpit, but it's not the correct one.

                          I'm sure because I always do a dnf install Cockpit afterwards, even though before I do that, Cockpit is working, and then after I run that, you can see it's installing a different version if you do not include the -y, it tells you.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • ObsolesceO
                            Obsolesce @JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            @jaredbusch I'd grab screenshots, but dont' have anything immediately available to do it on, adn I'm heading to bed soon.

                            black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • black3dynamiteB
                              black3dynamite @Obsolesce
                              last edited by black3dynamite

                              @tim_g said in Fedora 27: dnf package question:

                              @jaredbusch I'd grab screenshots, but dont' have anything immediately available to do it on, adn I'm heading to bed soon.

                              The default cockpit packages that is installed after selecting Fedora Server Edition using the netinstall.
                              https://i.imgur.com/dB8nVn2.png

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1 / 1
                              • First post
                                Last post