Ubuntu Boot Issues
-
@BRRABill said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
Yep, exact issue I had.
YOU LET BOOT GET FULL. Lol. That's another feature, right @scottalanmiller
Not to make an excuse - but as someone who doesn't know much and is trying to learn Linux - I am not sure it can be said that I allowed it to happen.
Therefore - I blame it on the fain.
-
@gjacobse said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
@BRRABill said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
Yep, exact issue I had.
YOU LET BOOT GET FULL. Lol. That's another feature, right @scottalanmiller
Not to make an excuse - but as someone who doesn't know much and is trying to learn Linux - I am not sure it can be said that I allowed it to happen.
Therefore - I blame it on the fain.
Oh I am on your side.
That was more a jab at @scottalanmiller
Who will now blame us.
-
@gjacobse said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
@BRRABill said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
Yep, exact issue I had.
YOU LET BOOT GET FULL. Lol. That's another feature, right @scottalanmiller
Not to make an excuse - but as someone who doesn't know much and is trying to learn Linux - I am not sure it can be said that I allowed it to happen.
Therefore - I blame it on the fain.
Who deployed old Ubuntu in the first place? What server is this?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
@gjacobse said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
@BRRABill said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
Yep, exact issue I had.
YOU LET BOOT GET FULL. Lol. That's another feature, right @scottalanmiller
Not to make an excuse - but as someone who doesn't know much and is trying to learn Linux - I am not sure it can be said that I allowed it to happen.
Therefore - I blame it on the fain.
Who deployed old Ubuntu in the first place? What server is this?
We took over this install
been running for ( x) years - it is for an UnFi controller. -
@gjacobse said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
We took over this install
been running for ( x) years - it is for an UnFi controller."It's been running for..." is another way of stating "it's been unmaintained for..."
-
pass
Freed up enough space to move forward.
sudo rm -f (File list from above)Running:
sudo apt-get -f install
(2017 Feb 8: Updated with command used to remove files to free up space in /boot) -
Post
:/boot$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on udev 231M 12K 231M 1% /dev tmpfs 49M 396K 48M 1% /run /dev/dm-0 49G 13G 34G 28% / none 4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup none 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock none 242M 0 242M 0% /run/shm none 100M 0 100M 0% /run/user /dev/sda1 228M 155M 61M 72% /boot -
Run the auto-cleanup script now,too.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
@gjacobse said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
I not sure what should be removed, but reading father down the article suggests just running
sudo apt-get autoremoveand this should be fine.Welcome to one of the many unpolished bits of Ubuntu compared to the other enterprise Linux offerings. It needs manual maintenance of updates. It's ridiculous. Yes, the autoremove option is the proper way to handle it.
LOL - see it's things like this, or XS's lack of autodetection being on USB and not disabling/moving Log Files like VMWare that just make some of us pull our hair out.
Don't get me wrong - Windows 10's desire to constantly change the default viewer for PDFs is currently driving me mad!
-
@Dashrender said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
@scottalanmiller said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
@gjacobse said in Linux system maintenance; /boot nearly full:
I not sure what should be removed, but reading father down the article suggests just running
sudo apt-get autoremoveand this should be fine.Welcome to one of the many unpolished bits of Ubuntu compared to the other enterprise Linux offerings. It needs manual maintenance of updates. It's ridiculous. Yes, the autoremove option is the proper way to handle it.
LOL - see it's things like this.... that just make some of us pull our hair out.
And that is why Ubuntu is not recommended for newbies to Linux or those not looking for a little more challenge. It's not polished and easy like CentOS is. It's fine, it's a very good system. It's easier than Windows. But it's not comparable to the OSes that would be recommended for someone coming to the Linux world.
The real question would be... why are you running Ubuntu if this is seen as a frustration? I realize in this case, Ubiquiti controllers more or less require it and that's a huge pain that they have introduced. But in general, just don't use it.
-
topic updated as requested.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:
The real question would be... why are you running Ubuntu if this is seen as a frustration? I realize in this case, Ubiquiti controllers more or less require it and that's a huge pain that they have introduced. But in general, just don't use it.
Yep, this is why I use it.. Ubiquiti and XO.
-
:/boot$ sudo apt-get autoremove Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be REMOVED: linux-image-3.13.0-96-generic linux-image-extra-3.13.0-96-generic 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 2 to remove and 18 not upgraded. After this operation, 195 MB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y (Reading database ... 649709 files and directories currently installed.) Removing linux-image-extra-3.13.0-96-generic (3.13.0-96.143) ... run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal 3.13.0-96-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-96-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/initramfs-tools 3.13.0-96-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-96-generic update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-96-generic grep: /boot/config-3.13.0-96-generic: No such file or directory run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/update-notifier 3.13.0-96-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-96-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/zz-update-grub 3.13.0-96-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-96-generic Generating grub configuration file ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-105-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-105-generic Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-103-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-103-generic Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-101-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-101-generic Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-100-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-100-generic Found memtest86+ image: /memtest86+.elf Found memtest86+ image: /memtest86+.bin done Removing linux-image-3.13.0-96-generic (3.13.0-96.143) ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.13.0-96-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-96-generic update-initramfs: Deleting /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-96-generic run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.13.0-96-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-96-generic Generating grub configuration file ... Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-105-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-105-generic Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-103-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-103-generic Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-101-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-101-generic Found linux image: /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-100-generic Found initrd image: /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-100-generic Found memtest86+ image: /memtest86+.elf Found memtest86+ image: /memtest86+.bin done -
i:/boot$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on udev 231M 12K 231M 1% /dev tmpfs 49M 396K 48M 1% /run /dev/dm-0 49G 13G 34G 28% / none 4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup none 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock none 242M 0 242M 0% /run/shm none 100M 0 100M 0% /run/user /dev/sda1 228M 151M 66M 70% /boot -
boy that didn't help much.
-
@Dashrender said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:
boy that didn't help much.
oh it did. went from 100% used to just 70% used.
-
Is this a problem started with the automatic security update feature of ubuntu? Is that option enabled on on this server?
-
@gjacobse said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:
@Dashrender said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:
boy that didn't help much.
oh it did. went from 100% used to just 70% used.
That was after you started your manual cleanup, which took you to 75%, now the automated tools took you down to 70%, that's what I was talking about.
-
@Dashrender said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:
@scottalanmiller said in Ubuntu Boot Issues:
The real question would be... why are you running Ubuntu if this is seen as a frustration? I realize in this case, Ubiquiti controllers more or less require it and that's a huge pain that they have introduced. But in general, just don't use it.
Yep, this is why I use it.. Ubiquiti and XO.
Same here.
-
During the course of this yesterday - the sources.list file got wiped.
Attempts to correct this resulted in more frustration so the VM was restored from back up and and running through this again.
I have updated a process or two to include the needed commands.
Currently space has been freed, the system updated, and autoremove is now running.
Post
sudo apt-get autoremovei:/boot$ df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on udev 231M 12K 231M 1% /dev tmpfs 49M 400K 48M 1% /run /dev/dm-0 49G 14G 33G 29% / none 4.0K 0 4.0K 0% /sys/fs/cgroup none 5.0M 0 5.0M 0% /run/lock none 242M 0 242M 0% /run/shm none 100M 0 100M 0% /run/user /dev/sda1 228M 97M 120M 45% /bootWhich is better than yesterday.
