ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD

    IT Discussion
    scale scale hc3 vmware esxi emc san storage inverted pyramid of doom ipod cost comparison
    7
    44
    8.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @Dashrender
      last edited by

      @Dashrender said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

      Scott will soon be adding vCenter - forgot the single pain of glass software for a system larger than the VMWare Essentials

      Yup, overlooked that since it was included at three nodes.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • htbaseH
        htbase
        last edited by htbase

        Would you mind if I add HTBase's HyperTask to the comparison?

        Four node system with 2x Intel Xen E5-2650v4 per node, 256GB per node, 6TB of SSD per node.

        Total cost (including 4 nodes and 3 years support):

        $71,600

        DashrenderD scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @htbase
          last edited by

          @htbase said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

          Would you mind if I add HTBase's HyperTask to the comparison?

          Four node system with 2x Intel Xen E5-2650v4 per node, 256GB per node, 6TB of SSD per node.

          Total cost (including 4 nodes and 3 years support):

          $71,600

          Need the 5 year support so that it matches the timeframe. I don't recall, are these the same processors Scott listed in the other thread?

          htbaseH scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • htbaseH
            htbase @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender Processors are better in our case compared to the original thread.

            To add 2 additional years of support, you would just be adding $5K, bringing the total to $76,600

            Still a good price when compared

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @Dashrender said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

              @htbase said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

              Would you mind if I add HTBase's HyperTask to the comparison?

              Four node system with 2x Intel Xen E5-2650v4 per node, 256GB per node, 6TB of SSD per node.

              Total cost (including 4 nodes and 3 years support):

              $71,600

              Need the 5 year support so that it matches the timeframe. I don't recall, are these the same processors Scott listed in the other thread?

              No, he used slightly higher end procs, the 2650 instead of the 2620

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @htbase
                last edited by

                @htbase said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                @Dashrender Processors are better in our case compared to the original thread.

                To add 2 additional years of support, you would just be adding $5K, bringing the total to $76,600

                Still a good price when compared

                So you have 6 TB SSD storage, what about the 32 TB of additional storage? really hoping to see an apples to apples comparison. granted, currently if you just added 32 TB of HDD, you'd be way ahead because you have 24 TB of SSD storage, vs the others having 8 TB of SSD storage.

                htbaseH 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @htbase
                  last edited by

                  @htbase thanks for jumping in to the "mix".

                  htbaseH 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • htbaseH
                    htbase @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender Yep, in that configuration we have 24 TB of SSD.

                    If we added an additional 32TB of HDD (given the fact you would already have 24TB of SSD), it would add around $13,000 to the total cost provided before

                    DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • htbaseH
                      htbase @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller :thumbsup_tone2:

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender @htbase
                        last edited by

                        @htbase said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                        @Dashrender Yep, in that configuration we have 24 TB of SSD.

                        If we added an additional 32TB of HDD (given the fact you would already have 24TB of SSD), it would add around $13,000 to the total cost provided before

                        So rolling that all together (though we have no idea what it looks like in configuration) we have
                        4 units (dual xeon 2650, 256 GB RAM, 6 TB SSD, 8 TB HDD, 5 yr warranty/support) = $89,600

                        Is that right?

                        So we have better processors, double the RAM and of the 56 TB of storage 30% more of it is SSD. right?

                        htbaseH 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DashrenderD
                          Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          Scott didn't mention the RAID controller in his Dells, what kind of RAID are in your boxes? how about the warranty, what are the details?

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                            Scott didn't mention the RAID controller in his Dells, what kind of RAID are in your boxes? how about the warranty, what are the details?

                            No RAID with hyperconverged players. Not that there couldn't be, but no one uses one. Since everyone has to have RAIN anyway at a higher layer, having a RAID controller doesn't add any value. So none in the Scale, VSAN, Starwind or IPOD examples. Not just no RAID controller, no RAID at all. HTBase is the same in that regard.

                            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                              @Dashrender said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                              Scott didn't mention the RAID controller in his Dells, what kind of RAID are in your boxes? how about the warranty, what are the details?

                              No RAID with hyperconverged players. Not that there couldn't be, but no one uses one. Since everyone has to have RAIN anyway at a higher layer, having a RAID controller doesn't add any value. So none in the Scale, VSAN, Starwind or IPOD examples. Not just no RAID controller, no RAID at all. HTBase is the same in that regard.

                              for the uninitiated, you just blew my mind a little.

                              travisdh1T scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • travisdh1T
                                travisdh1 @Dashrender
                                last edited by

                                @Dashrender said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                                @scottalanmiller said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                                @Dashrender said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                                Scott didn't mention the RAID controller in his Dells, what kind of RAID are in your boxes? how about the warranty, what are the details?

                                No RAID with hyperconverged players. Not that there couldn't be, but no one uses one. Since everyone has to have RAIN anyway at a higher layer, having a RAID controller doesn't add any value. So none in the Scale, VSAN, Starwind or IPOD examples. Not just no RAID controller, no RAID at all. HTBase is the same in that regard.

                                for the uninitiated, you just blew my mind a little.

                                @Dashrender I was SO confused the first few times I ran into RAIN being discussed.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                                  @Dashrender said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                                  Scott didn't mention the RAID controller in his Dells, what kind of RAID are in your boxes? how about the warranty, what are the details?

                                  No RAID with hyperconverged players. Not that there couldn't be, but no one uses one. Since everyone has to have RAIN anyway at a higher layer, having a RAID controller doesn't add any value. So none in the Scale, VSAN, Starwind or IPOD examples. Not just no RAID controller, no RAID at all. HTBase is the same in that regard.

                                  for the uninitiated, you just blew my mind a little.

                                  @John-Nicholson and I have been talking about the death of RAID for years. RAID pretty much exists as a vestige for very small environments that still see their infrastructure in terms of "a single server" and not as clusters and clouds. Once you get beyond the "each node handles its own storage" point (which only applies to one or possibly two host clusters) RAID has no value. Gluster, CEPH, and anything perceived as "cloud storage" and anything like VSAN, Starwind or hyperconvergence are all RAID-less. We've long been in the post-RAID world, RAID remains almost solely for the smallest SMBs.

                                  Net RunnerN 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    We were on the cusp of being post-RAID at the Wall St. shop I was in by 2006. We were evaluating non-RAID clustering but it just wasn't there in performance terms at the time. We were able to use RAID to go faster for our big performance needs, but that was a long time ago. Luster was a major push to change that.

                                    dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • htbaseH
                                      htbase @Dashrender
                                      last edited by

                                      @Dashrender Yep, thats right!

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • dafyreD
                                        dafyre @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                                        We were on the cusp of being post-RAID at the Wall St. shop I was in by 2006. We were evaluating non-RAID clustering but it just wasn't there in performance terms at the time. We were able to use RAID to go faster for our big performance needs, but that was a long time ago. Luster was a major push to change that.

                                        What are alternatives to Lustre today? Gluster?

                                        htbaseH 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • htbaseH
                                          htbase @dafyre
                                          last edited by

                                          @dafyre HTFS from HTBase too! 😄

                                          dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • dafyreD
                                            dafyre @htbase
                                            last edited by

                                            @htbase said in Cost Study: 4 Node Scale vs. 4 Node VMware IPOD:

                                            @dafyre HTFS from HTBase too! 😄

                                            Is the HTFS free or open source?

                                            If it's not free, how is it priced -- per host, per TB... etc?

                                            scottalanmillerS htbaseH 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 1 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post