I can't even
-
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
@TAHIN said in I can't even:
@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:
IOP's. That's a new way to write that.
- Slow server? Just increase the IOP's. It's right there. In the settings. Don't worry: it exists.
- Slow internet? Wiggle the network cable, and then flex it back and forth like a glow stick. That will get rid of any blockages in the line.
- Slow printing? Try using a more slippery type of paper.
Yo ushould just make a How To for them.
Ha yep. Make it a how-to in SpiceWorks, receive upvotes, be awarded 200 points. This is a solid plan.
-
-
-
-
click all the carrots!
-
How is this person in charge of designing the system without any freaking clue about where the hypervisor is installed too, what the array configuration should look like and lastly what and why an OBR is better than splitting arrays!
Already has an in depth BA, but come on . . .
-
And considering RAID5 for 3-4TB of data.....
Why not RAID1 with a meager 2 drives.....
-
Anyone know this guy? Saw him begging for upvotes
-
-
dd a live system to make it a VM and is okay with data corruption so long as he can get the VM to boot.
hahaha.. . . .
It's just a freaking mad house. . .
-
@DustinB3403 said in I can't even:
dd a live system to make it a VM and is okay with data corruption so long as he can get the VM to boot.
hahaha.. . . .
It's just a freaking mad house. . .
dd? Would use rsync for this, so a file-level copy, not a bit-copy.
-
@TAHIN said in I can't even:
- Slow printing? Try using a more slippery type of paper.
Where's curtis?
-
So another quote from Dell and HP, and moderators trying to squelch relavent information regarding the pricing and provided quotes.
For a meager 8.4TB, yeah you need a SAN!
Um SW mods, get realistic, asking a question of how something is to be configured and planned usage is directly in line with the topic.
Nothing was brought up about the IPOD design being quoted, nor the horrible concept that needing a meager 8.4TB of storage requires a SAN.
Just the question of how is the SAN planned for. . . like get off your high horse.
-
@DustinB3403 if you feel that there is a bad moderation, send it to Sean. He's gotten a lot of complaints filed this week, and that this was being planned for is one of them. Not knowing what exactly was moderated, it's hard to know what the grounds might have been.
-
@scottalanmiller Even the OP doesn't know why replies were deleted from the topic.
-
Tagging @Jimmy9008
-
@DustinB3403 wow, that seems like someone got pretty overzealous there.
-
That moderator is over zealous.
I mean look at this:
I queried it and kept asking if he was serious...he was. He could not see 1 drop of sarcasm in my post.
-
Because of the systemic derailment of topics in Virtualization and Storage, they have their own terms, and they are rigorously enforced. For better or for worse, that is what is the standard.
-
@Kelly said in I can't even:
Because of the systemic derailment of topics in Virtualization and Storage, they have their own terms, and they are rigorously enforced. For better or for worse, that is what is the standard.
Well, new as of this week. Storage just put them in. And that they don't match the rest of the site is a bit of a problem as you have to just "know" that there are special terms run independently. If the special terms were valid, why aren't they used in the rest of the site? Clearly there is disagreement as to who is in charge and if the terms are good or bad. They are also, and this is my specific complaint, not easily determined and are 100% at the whim and personal preference of the just a few people.
