ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Lightweight Linux...

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    27 Posts 10 Posters 1.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • B
      bbigford
      last edited by bbigford

      Current specs...

      0_1473635154490_tmp_24123-20160911_170336-1020952206.jpg

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • B
        bbigford
        last edited by bbigford

        One thing I've noticed, is that scrolling in both Mint and Korora is very fluid, but there is some screen tearing. I'm not surprised at screen tearing overall, but I am surprised that it's happening from the top left corner, to the bottom right corner. Whenever screen tearing happens, it usually happens across the center, horizontally, since that is how a graphics card render an image. Not a big issue, just something I noticed. Only happens when I'm scrolling quickly, over an image.

        Not troubleshooting that though, just something I noted about this device. I hadn't tried it on the super slow install of Windows. I immediately installed Linux, so I can't verify if it is merely a graphics issue with Linux.

        S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • T
          travisdh1
          last edited by

          Putting an SSD into that will make it feel a lot snappier for sure. The CPU is kinda weak, but not terrible.

          Also, stop thinking of "lightweight" being a distribution. It's the windowing interface that will bog things down. I like Mint and KDE, but I know that KDE is a resource hog. Try LXDE and/or XFCE a shot.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • R
            RamblingBiped
            last edited by

            Try lubuntu; I have a core 2 duo with 2GB of memory that runs really well with it installed. It uses LXDE by default.

            S B S 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 4
            • S
              stacksofplates @RamblingBiped
              last edited by stacksofplates

              @RamblingBiped said in Lightweight Linux...:

              Try lubuntu; I have a core 2 duo with 2GB of memory that runs really well with it installed. It uses LXDE by default.

              That's what I would do. You could use something like Slitaz or Tiny Core but they aren't very user friendly.

              Edit: ah I missed that you mentioned Tiny Core.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • S
                stacksofplates
                last edited by

                Fedora also has a Mate spin that's not bad.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • S
                  stacksofplates @bbigford
                  last edited by

                  @BBigford said in Lightweight Linux...:

                  One thing I've noticed, is that scrolling in both Mint and Korora is very fluid, but there is some screen tearing. I'm not surprised at screen tearing overall, but I am surprised that it's happening from the top left corner, to the bottom right corner. Whenever screen tearing happens, it usually happens across the center, horizontally, since that is how a graphics card render an image. Not a big issue, just something I noticed. Only happens when I'm scrolling quickly, over an image.

                  Not troubleshooting that though, just something I noted about this device. I hadn't tried it on the super slow install of Windows. I immediately installed Linux, so I can't verify if it is merely a graphics issue with Linux.

                  I had some issues with the 4.6 kernel on my Chromebook with the Intel HD audio and graphics. That might be related to the tearing. I just installed elementary that's based on 16.04 and it's fine.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • B
                    bbigford @RamblingBiped
                    last edited by

                    @RamblingBiped said in Lightweight Linux...:

                    Try lubuntu; I have a core 2 duo with 2GB of memory that runs really well with it installed. It uses LXDE by default.

                    That was going to be my next install. I'll give that a shot.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • N
                      nadnerB
                      last edited by nadnerB

                      I have Xubuntu on an older lappy (Core 2 Duo) but I managed to find another 2GB RAM (so it has 4 now). It's very smooth and pretty fast on the older architecture.

                      My Netbook used Ubuntu something.somethingelse (14.10 was the last upgrade before I tried to sell it)... Performance was good, no noticable screen tearing, shut down in 30 seconds but possibly a bit too big graphically as it was a bit slow to respond to opening of Firefox and other things. However... HUGE difference over XP... but anything was an improvement over that implementation.

                      You could go super tiny with DSL (Damn Small Linux) but I think that's taking things a bit too far.

                      C 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • C
                        coliver @nadnerB
                        last edited by

                        @nadnerB said in Lightweight Linux...:

                        I have Xubuntu on an older lappy (Core 2 Duo) but I managed to find another 2GB RAM (so it has 4 now). It's very smooth and pretty fast on the older architecture.

                        My Netbook used Ubuntu something.somethingelse (14.10 was the last upgrade before I tried to sell it)... Performance was good, no noticable screen tearing, shut down in 30 seconds but possibly a bit too big graphically as it was a bit slow to respond to opening of Firefox and other things. However... HUGE difference over XP... but anything was an improvement over that implementation.

                        You could go super tiny with DSL (Damn Small Linux) but I think that's taking things a bit too far.

                        Is DSL still under development? I don't think they've done much in 8 years. That was my go to run it on the school computers from USB stick distribution.

                        N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • N
                          nadnerB @coliver
                          last edited by

                          @coliver said in Lightweight Linux...:

                          @nadnerB said in Lightweight Linux...:

                          I have Xubuntu on an older lappy (Core 2 Duo) but I managed to find another 2GB RAM (so it has 4 now). It's very smooth and pretty fast on the older architecture.

                          My Netbook used Ubuntu something.somethingelse (14.10 was the last upgrade before I tried to sell it)... Performance was good, no noticable screen tearing, shut down in 30 seconds but possibly a bit too big graphically as it was a bit slow to respond to opening of Firefox and other things. However... HUGE difference over XP... but anything was an improvement over that implementation.

                          You could go super tiny with DSL (Damn Small Linux) but I think that's taking things a bit too far.

                          Is DSL still under development? I don't think they've done much in 8 years. That was my go to run it on the school computers from USB stick distribution.

                          Not sure. Admittedly, it's been ages since I used it...
                          ...
                          There are not dates on the change log...
                          ...
                          Forum post 08/JUL/2016

                          After a long hiatus I am bring this project back to life. The first step was to bring this site back to working order. We now have a functioning forum (this). The old forum is now static HTML and it available here (http://damnsmalllinux.org/static/).

                          Next I'll be doing a release of DSL to fix some bugs and time-bugs and get the distro in proper working order. For now I do not see the scope of the project changing much -- the goal will be the same, pack as much utility and applications into 50 MB as possible.

                          Sooo, still not sure

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • D
                            dafyre
                            last edited by

                            I'd definitely check out one of the Mate GUIs. That's my go-to of choice these days, even on a hefty system with good specs.

                            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              bbigford @dafyre
                              last edited by

                              @dafyre said in Lightweight Linux...:

                              I'd definitely check out one of the Mate GUIs. That's my go-to of choice these days, even on a hefty system with good specs.

                              Is Mate really that much lighter on resources than Cinnamon?

                              D S 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • D
                                dafyre @bbigford
                                last edited by dafyre

                                @BBigford said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                @dafyre said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                I'd definitely check out one of the Mate GUIs. That's my go-to of choice these days, even on a hefty system with good specs.

                                Is Mate really that much lighter on resources than Cinnamon?

                                I think so. It works extremely well over remote connections via X2Go. Any of the Desktop Environments that provide a lot of eye candy don't seem to do well at all (especially remotely).

                                If you need seriously light weight, though... XFCE or LXDE are probably your winners here. But I'd suggest a Linux Mint 18 install with Mate, and if that doesn't work, just fiddle with the other desktop environments until you find one you like... (Mate, XFCE, LXDE, IceWM are current choices I like).

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • S
                                  scottalanmiller @RamblingBiped
                                  last edited by

                                  @RamblingBiped said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                  Try lubuntu; I have a core 2 duo with 2GB of memory that runs really well with it installed. It uses LXDE by default.

                                  This. LXDE is pretty much the only option. You are testing heavy distros with nice desktops. That won't work. You need one with a light desktop. Only light desktop for non-UNIX users is really LXDE.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • S
                                    scottalanmiller @bbigford
                                    last edited by

                                    @BBigford said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                    @dafyre said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                    I'd definitely check out one of the Mate GUIs. That's my go-to of choice these days, even on a hefty system with good specs.

                                    Is Mate really that much lighter on resources than Cinnamon?

                                    Yes, MATE doesn't require a GPU, Cinnamon does. Cinnamon is designed to be really powerful on modern, underutilized hardware with an idle GPU. Mate is a traditional desktop. IceWM, LXDE, XFCE and others are designed to be light, not just "not heavy."

                                    Anything based on Gnome3 (Cinnamon, Unity) or KDE is going to be way too heavy for you.

                                    B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • B
                                      bbigford @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                      @BBigford said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                      @dafyre said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                      I'd definitely check out one of the Mate GUIs. That's my go-to of choice these days, even on a hefty system with good specs.

                                      Is Mate really that much lighter on resources than Cinnamon?

                                      Yes, MATE doesn't require a GPU, Cinnamon does. Cinnamon is designed to be really powerful on modern, underutilized hardware with an idle GPU. Mate is a traditional desktop. IceWM, LXDE, XFCE and others are designed to be light, not just "not heavy."

                                      Anything based on Gnome3 (Cinnamon, Unity) or KDE is going to be way too heavy for you.

                                      Ah, well that explains the screen tearing.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                      • R
                                        RamblingBiped
                                        last edited by RamblingBiped

                                        Personally, I still don't get the favoritism between desktops. If I can accomplish a task without touching my mouse I'm happy. Most of what I do when I'm working from a Linux OS is done and accomplished in a terminal.realistically, all I really feel like I need is a terminal, a functioning web browser, and Libre Office on occasion.

                                        What the GUI wrapper looks like honestly doesn't concern me all that much. The less a GUI gets in the way, the happier I am with it. I think this is why I really don't have a problem with Ubuntu's default UI for their desktop distro. I hide the Unity dock/panel and it's clean and out of the way. It's also why I like LXDE. It doesn't get in the way and doesn't consume much in regards to resources.

                                        D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • D
                                          dafyre @RamblingBiped
                                          last edited by

                                          @RamblingBiped said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                          Personally, I still don't get the favoritism between desktops. If I can accomplish a task without touching my mouse I'm happy. Most of what I do when I'm working from a Linux OS is done and accomplished in a terminal.realistically, all I really feel like I need is a terminal, a functioning web browser, and Libre Office on occasion.

                                          What the GUI wrapper looks like honestly doesn't concern me all that much. The less a GUI gets in the way, the happier I am with it. I think this is why I really don't have a problem with Ubuntu's default UI for their desktop distro. I hide the Unity dock/panel and it's clean and out of the way. It's also why I like LXDE. It doesn't get in the way and doesn't consume much in regards to resources.

                                          Sounds like you should try the i3 Window Manager, ha ha!

                                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • S
                                            stacksofplates @dafyre
                                            last edited by

                                            @dafyre said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                            @RamblingBiped said in Lightweight Linux...:

                                            Personally, I still don't get the favoritism between desktops. If I can accomplish a task without touching my mouse I'm happy. Most of what I do when I'm working from a Linux OS is done and accomplished in a terminal.realistically, all I really feel like I need is a terminal, a functioning web browser, and Libre Office on occasion.

                                            What the GUI wrapper looks like honestly doesn't concern me all that much. The less a GUI gets in the way, the happier I am with it. I think this is why I really don't have a problem with Ubuntu's default UI for their desktop distro. I hide the Unity dock/panel and it's clean and out of the way. It's also why I like LXDE. It doesn't get in the way and doesn't consume much in regards to resources.

                                            Sounds like you should try the i3 Window Manager, ha ha!

                                            Ya if you don't want frills and just want keyboard, that's the best. I love it.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post