ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Domain Controller Down (VM)

    IT Discussion
    16
    609
    96.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @coliver
      last edited by

      @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

      If you have no backups then you need to look at DHCP and getting a second/new server set up. Or seeing if your firewall has the ability to hand out addresses that may be the quickest way to do it. management decided that this outage doesn't matter.

      And I mean this. Stop for a moment, remove the stress. Management has made it totally clear to you, before this happened, that they were not concerned about this outage, right? Don't take on stress that the company doesn't have. If they don't care, why do you? I'm not saying you don't fix it, of course you fix it. But don't stress about it. They knew this was going to happen and being a 2003 machine, they knew it would be soon. They accepted the risk, they accept the consequences. It's as simple as that.

      wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch @wirestyle22
        last edited by

        @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

        @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

        @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

        @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

        @wirestyle22 is the VMDK there?

        When I attempt to browse it kicks back an error stating "the server could not interpret the users request. the server is unavailable"

        You're browsing in the VMWare console? The easiest way to get to it is via:

        0_1473355605895_chrome_2016-09-08_13-26-23.png

        I'm running version 5.1.0 and I just click on Datastores

        So you are using the fat client on your workstation?

        Are you logged in with VMWare local account or a domain account?

        Because obviously you have domain issues because of the bad DNS setup.

        log in to the VMWare client with root and the local password.

        wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @BRRABill
          last edited by

          @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

          @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

          The fastest thing to do is to do is to simply restore from Veeam/Unitrends/Whatever.

          Done up and nothing else matters.

          You can then prioritize resolving the fagility in the current setup.

          So AD on the down DC would not have been syncing with the other DC he has if DNS was set up incorrectly?

          Correct. Nothing works when it doesn't work. That's what not working means. "Set up incorrectly" is just another way of saying "not working."

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • wirestyle22W
            wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

            @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

            If you have no backups then you need to look at DHCP and getting a second/new server set up. Or seeing if your firewall has the ability to hand out addresses that may be the quickest way to do it. management decided that this outage doesn't matter.

            And I mean this. Stop for a moment, remove the stress. Management has made it totally clear to you, before this happened, that they were not concerned about this outage, right? Don't take on stress that the company doesn't have. If they don't care, why do you? I'm not saying you don't fix it, of course you fix it. But don't stress about it. They knew this was going to happen and being a 2003 machine, they knew it would be soon. They accepted the risk, they accept the consequences. It's as simple as that.

            I'm stressed because I honestly do not know how to fix it. I have people calling me literally every 2 minutes for progress updates and I really have nothing to tell them. My job is to know and I don't know.

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @BRRABill
              last edited by

              @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

              @JaredBusch said

              This does not matter FFS, forget about AD.

              He said there is another DC. How does it not matter?

              He also said it doesn't work. AD isn't the issue right now.

              JaredBuschJ BRRABillB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • wirestyle22W
                wirestyle22 @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                @wirestyle22 is the VMDK there?

                When I attempt to browse it kicks back an error stating "the server could not interpret the users request. the server is unavailable"

                You're browsing in the VMWare console? The easiest way to get to it is via:

                0_1473355605895_chrome_2016-09-08_13-26-23.png

                I'm running version 5.1.0 and I just click on Datastores

                So you are using the fat client on your workstation?

                Are you logged in with VMWare local account or a domain account?

                Because obviously you have domain issues because of the bad DNS setup.

                log in to the VMWare client with root and the local password.

                I'm logging in with root and the local password actually on the server itself.

                JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • JaredBuschJ
                  JaredBusch @wirestyle22
                  last edited by

                  @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                  @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                  @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                  @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                  @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                  @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                  @wirestyle22 is the VMDK there?

                  When I attempt to browse it kicks back an error stating "the server could not interpret the users request. the server is unavailable"

                  You're browsing in the VMWare console? The easiest way to get to it is via:

                  0_1473355605895_chrome_2016-09-08_13-26-23.png

                  I'm running version 5.1.0 and I just click on Datastores

                  So you are using the fat client on your workstation?

                  Are you logged in with VMWare local account or a domain account?

                  Because obviously you have domain issues because of the bad DNS setup.

                  log in to the VMWare client with root and the local password.

                  I'm logging in with root and the local password actually on the server itself.

                  No you are not. You said you are using a client. The VMWare server itself only provides a command line interface.

                  wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @BRRABill
                    last edited by

                    @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                    @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                    @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                    @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                    @JaredBusch said

                    This does not matter FFS, forget about AD.

                    He said there is another DC. How does it not matter?

                    It only matters if that other DC is also a DNS and DHCP server.

                    And this is not possible in a 2003/2008 environment. DHCP redundancy was only added in 2012 R2 (maybe 2012).

                    DHCP is not what I am thinking about.

                    It was my understand that AD and DNS are linked. AKA, DNS is required to run AD.

                    Unilaterally coupled, yes. DNS is needed for AD; AD is irrelevant to DNS. Right now, he has a network issue. AD simply doesn't matter right now. AD outages rarely matter. DNS and DHCP outages, normally are critical.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • wirestyle22W
                      wirestyle22 @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                      @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                      @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                      @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                      @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                      @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                      @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                      @wirestyle22 is the VMDK there?

                      When I attempt to browse it kicks back an error stating "the server could not interpret the users request. the server is unavailable"

                      You're browsing in the VMWare console? The easiest way to get to it is via:

                      0_1473355605895_chrome_2016-09-08_13-26-23.png

                      I'm running version 5.1.0 and I just click on Datastores

                      So you are using the fat client on your workstation?

                      Are you logged in with VMWare local account or a domain account?

                      Because obviously you have domain issues because of the bad DNS setup.

                      log in to the VMWare client with root and the local password.

                      I'm logging in with root and the local password actually on the server itself.

                      No you are not. You said you are using a client. The VMWare server itself only provides a command line interface.

                      They created a VM called vcenter that uses the client so yes you are correct.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @BRRABill
                        last edited by

                        @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                        Hence if he is doing a restore of a DC with another working DC in the domain, it could cause even more issues.

                        Or am I totally wrong here?

                        There isn't another working DC.

                        BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                          @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                          @JaredBusch said

                          This does not matter FFS, forget about AD.

                          He said there is another DC. How does it not matter?

                          He also said it doesn't work. AD isn't the issue right now.

                          Well it might work but he has not easy way to know that right now because DHCP is down. If his DHCP server had handed out this DC as a secondary DNS, then things would still be working. Thus why I assume his DHCP is improperly configured. but again. no way to know that until he brings it back online.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • BRRABillB
                            BRRABill @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                            @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                            @JaredBusch said

                            This does not matter FFS, forget about AD.

                            He said there is another DC. How does it not matter?

                            He also said it doesn't work. AD isn't the issue right now.

                            No he said he can't access it.

                            If, as was mentioned (by @JaredBusch I think) the DNS settings in DHCP were incorrect, that would make sense.

                            All I was trying to say is that there MIGHT be a working DC on the network still. It's possible the only issue MIGHT be that DNS settings on the client are wrong.

                            So...

                            1. In this scenario, if he adds the second DC to his client DNS and it works, that temporarily fixes his issue. He can install DHCP and take his time getting the 2003 server back up.

                            2. Also in this scenario (if there is a working DC still there) I thought it was verboten to just restore. It has to be restored a certain way.

                            JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                              last edited by

                              @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                              @scottalanmiller said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                              @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                              If you have no backups then you need to look at DHCP and getting a second/new server set up. Or seeing if your firewall has the ability to hand out addresses that may be the quickest way to do it. management decided that this outage doesn't matter.

                              And I mean this. Stop for a moment, remove the stress. Management has made it totally clear to you, before this happened, that they were not concerned about this outage, right? Don't take on stress that the company doesn't have. If they don't care, why do you? I'm not saying you don't fix it, of course you fix it. But don't stress about it. They knew this was going to happen and being a 2003 machine, they knew it would be soon. They accepted the risk, they accept the consequences. It's as simple as that.

                              I'm stressed because I honestly do not know how to fix it. I have people calling me literally every 2 minutes for progress updates and I really have nothing to tell them. My job is to know and I don't know.

                              Tell them to stop calling. Have someone send out a notice that there is a network down and any request for update means that they think that their status is MORE important than fixing the outage. Make this clear. Ask the CEO to notify the company. Tell him that you have people causing further network problems by blocking you from working.

                              Or just stop answering the phone. Where is your boss, his job is to protect you from this. Why are calls coming to the person working on the problem?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                              • BRRABillB
                                BRRABill @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                Hence if he is doing a restore of a DC with another working DC in the domain, it could cause even more issues.

                                Or am I totally wrong here?

                                There isn't another working DC.

                                How do you know that? He said there was one, and the only reason mentioned it might be down was that his PC says "no domain controllers found" but as @JaredBusch has been saying, if DNS is misconfigured, that could also happen, right?

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JaredBuschJ
                                  JaredBusch @BRRABill
                                  last edited by

                                  @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                  @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                  @JaredBusch said

                                  This does not matter FFS, forget about AD.

                                  He said there is another DC. How does it not matter?

                                  He also said it doesn't work. AD isn't the issue right now.

                                  No he said he can't access it.

                                  If, as was mentioned (by @JaredBusch I think) the DNS settings in DHCP were incorrect, that would make sense.

                                  All I was trying to say is that there MIGHT be a working DC on the network still. It's possible the only issue MIGHT be that DNS settings on the client are wrong.

                                  The secondary DC is not relevant. And changing every client to static IP scheme would be a pain in the ass when he should simply connect to ESXi, and make a new VM based on the VMDK we hope is still there.

                                  BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                  • BRRABillB
                                    BRRABill @JaredBusch
                                    last edited by

                                    @JaredBusch said

                                    The secondary DC is not relevant. And changing every client to static IP scheme would be a pain in the ass when he should simply connect to ESXi, and make a new VM based on the VMDK we hope is still there.

                                    Oh yes, that is fine. 🙂

                                    My concern was a restore from backup.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • scottalanmillerS
                                      scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                                      last edited by

                                      @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                      @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                      @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                      @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                      @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                      @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                      @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                      @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                      @wirestyle22 is the VMDK there?

                                      When I attempt to browse it kicks back an error stating "the server could not interpret the users request. the server is unavailable"

                                      You're browsing in the VMWare console? The easiest way to get to it is via:

                                      0_1473355605895_chrome_2016-09-08_13-26-23.png

                                      I'm running version 5.1.0 and I just click on Datastores

                                      So you are using the fat client on your workstation?

                                      Are you logged in with VMWare local account or a domain account?

                                      Because obviously you have domain issues because of the bad DNS setup.

                                      log in to the VMWare client with root and the local password.

                                      I'm logging in with root and the local password actually on the server itself.

                                      No you are not. You said you are using a client. The VMWare server itself only provides a command line interface.

                                      They created a VM called vcenter that uses the client so yes you are correct.

                                      That's not what anyone means when we say to log into the VMware ESXi server itself. That's a client on a VM. Very, very different.

                                      Log into the actual server to remove any unnecessary points of complexity.

                                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                                        last edited by

                                        @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                        @scottalanmiller said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                        @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                        @JaredBusch said

                                        This does not matter FFS, forget about AD.

                                        He said there is another DC. How does it not matter?

                                        He also said it doesn't work. AD isn't the issue right now.

                                        Well it might work but he has not easy way to know that right now because DHCP is down. If his DHCP server had handed out this DC as a secondary DNS, then things would still be working. Thus why I assume his DHCP is improperly configured. but again. no way to know that until he brings it back online.

                                        Oh good point. Yes, it might be fine on its own. But we assume that it's not actively on the domain or that domain members are not aware of it, so it can't cause problem because it is isolated.

                                        BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @BRRABill
                                          last edited by

                                          @BRRABill said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                          No he said he can't access it.

                                          He did?

                                          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • JaredBuschJ
                                            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                            @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                            @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                            @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                            @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                            @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                            @coliver said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                            @wirestyle22 said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                            @JaredBusch said in Domain Controller Down (VM):

                                            @wirestyle22 is the VMDK there?

                                            When I attempt to browse it kicks back an error stating "the server could not interpret the users request. the server is unavailable"

                                            You're browsing in the VMWare console? The easiest way to get to it is via:

                                            0_1473355605895_chrome_2016-09-08_13-26-23.png

                                            I'm running version 5.1.0 and I just click on Datastores

                                            So you are using the fat client on your workstation?

                                            Are you logged in with VMWare local account or a domain account?

                                            Because obviously you have domain issues because of the bad DNS setup.

                                            log in to the VMWare client with root and the local password.

                                            I'm logging in with root and the local password actually on the server itself.

                                            No you are not. You said you are using a client. The VMWare server itself only provides a command line interface.

                                            They created a VM called vcenter that uses the client so yes you are correct.

                                            That's not what anyone means when we say to log into the VMware ESXi server itself. That's a client on a VM. Very, very different.

                                            Log into the actual server to remove any unnecessary points of complexity.

                                            That VM is likely jsut running the VMWare vCenter web thing or whatever it is called.

                                            Install the old thick client on your desk and connect to the server directly and browse the data store.

                                            scottalanmillerS wirestyle22W 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 30
                                            • 31
                                            • 5 / 31
                                            • First post
                                              Last post