ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Lenovo Ushers in a New Era of Mobile Workstation Power and Performance with Lenovo ThinkPad P50 and P70

    IT Discussion
    14
    141
    25.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      I agree, someone somewhere must need crazy power in a mobile device but it is very, very rare. Mostly it is just people with too much money to spend or businesses that don't look into this stuff carefully enough and people convince their managers to get these things for them as a badge of pride that they could get something so expensive.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • W
        WingCreative
        last edited by

        Lenovo Ushers in a New Era of of Sneaking Software onto Your Computer and Opening Security Holes

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          Wow. Just.... wow. That anyone is willing to do business with them anymore is mind boggling to me. What would entice someone to let their salesman in the door? The lengths that they will go to are unthinkable.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • H
            hubtechagain
            last edited by

            i like my lenovo laptop....

            stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • stacksofplatesS
              stacksofplates
              last edited by

              From that link:
              "That turns out to be a method Microsoft introduced with Windows 8 to allow the BIOS to execute code on boot up (!?!) called "Windows Platform Binary Table (WPBT)""

              Isn't that the whole reason UEFI exists, so we can't have that happen?

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stacksofplatesS
                stacksofplates @hubtechagain
                last edited by

                @hubtechagain I have a Lenovo that I got for free, however it has Linux on it so I think I'm ok?

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                  last edited by

                  @johnhooks said:

                  Isn't that the whole reason UEFI exists, so we can't have that happen?

                  No, UEFI exists to promote Windows lock in.

                  stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • stacksofplatesS
                    stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    @johnhooks said:

                    Isn't that the whole reason UEFI exists, so we can't have that happen?

                    No, UEFI exists to promote Windows lock in.

                    I guess I should rephrase that, wasn't that the proposed reason, so only verified code could run?

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                      last edited by

                      @johnhooks said:

                      @hubtechagain I have a Lenovo that I got for free, however it has Linux on it so I think I'm ok?

                      We got one for free, I'm not impressed with it at all. I'm surprised that they decided to give something away that would not be impressive. So as a Lenovo owner I'm like "even for free, we aren't happy". Nothing is less impressive than only being marginally useful for free.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                        last edited by

                        @johnhooks said:

                        I guess I should rephrase that, wasn't that the proposed reason, so only verified code could run?

                        Yes, Microsoft verified code, not code for you. It's basically designed to promote malware that someone has paid the vendors to approve.

                        stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • stacksofplatesS
                          stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by stacksofplates

                          @scottalanmiller Oh ok, I guess that makes sense. I never realized it had to be verified by them, but now that I think of it, who else could verify it?

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • stacksofplatesS
                            stacksofplates
                            last edited by

                            So how can we load Linux on through UEFI? They just allow it for now?

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                              last edited by

                              @johnhooks said:

                              @scottalanmiller Oh ok, I guess that makes sense. I never realized it had to be verified by them, but now that I think of it, who else could verify it?

                              "Verified" is one of those tricky marketing words that sounds great and you can get people to say "of course we want that" when, in fact, it is generally a potentially very bad thing.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                                last edited by

                                @johnhooks said:

                                So how can we load Linux on through UEFI? They just allow it for now?

                                Linux itself isn't a thing. Some OSes are verified, some are not. UEFI can be made to be controlled by the user, sometimes not.

                                stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stacksofplatesS
                                  stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said:

                                  @johnhooks said:

                                  So how can we load Linux on through UEFI? They just allow it for now?

                                  Linux itself isn't a thing. Some OSes are verified, some are not. UEFI can be made to be controlled by the user, sometimes not.

                                  Oh ok.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    UEFI makes things really complex 😞

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • stacksofplatesS
                                      stacksofplates
                                      last edited by

                                      Who do you use? I have an ASUS and it's been fine so far. I wondered if it's worth it to get something like a System76?

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        I haven't built a system in over a decade 😉

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • stacksofplatesS
                                          stacksofplates
                                          last edited by stacksofplates

                                          So I've been thinking. Who's the bigger devil out of this mess, Lenovo who was using a channel that was given to them (which lets face it, most people would do - not all but most) or Microsoft for giving them the ability?

                                          This is in reference to the pre Windows executed code, not superfish.

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
                                            last edited by

                                            @johnhooks said:

                                            So I've been thinking. Who's the bigger devil out of this mess, Lenovo who was using a channel that was given to them (which lets face it, most people would do - not all but most) or Microsoft for giving them the ability?

                                            This is in reference to the pre Windows executed code, not superfish.

                                            Lenovo is my feeling. Not to get into that debate (because I think agree with how this sounds) but you don't blame the gun, you blame the person who wields it. There are tons and tons of ways to be harmed out there and we can't rely on people not making weapons or tools that can be used as weapons but on the criminals who see an opportunity to do harm and leverage it.

                                            stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 8
                                            • 2 / 8
                                            • First post
                                              Last post