ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    CloudatCost Outage Bigger Than Before

    IT Discussion
    cloudatcost fibernetics
    2
    12
    3.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      So now that CloudatCost has stopped supporting their lifetime agreement on servers (no images, no power cycles - run till you crash then the lifetime is over) there is nothing. They are "forcing" everyone to CloudatCost Pro service. But there is no service. This is all that there is.

      Screen Shot 2015-05-02 at 2.57.43 PM.png

      Apparently Fibernetics and CloudatCost have given up completely and have shut down? After the intentional (they had failover and chose to keep us offline for 30 hours) outage of the last two days they didn't bring us back to working servers. Now there is nothing at all.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        No CloudatCost service remaining. None. Nothing. Nada. Been emailing them all morning. Nothing.

        I can only assume that they are actually out of business now.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DanpD
          Danp
          last edited by

          FWIW, I'm still able to log into the panel and I don't get that particular error.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @Danp
            last edited by

            @Danp said:

            FWIW, I'm still able to log into the panel and I don't get that particular error.

            Twitter feed has people talking about how the CloudatCost Pro service doesn't exist. What do you get? Are you able to build servers?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              https://twitter.com/eli3b/status/594419698474823680

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                https://twitter.com/mikewilks/status/594473728475537408

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DanpD
                  Danp
                  last edited by

                  I suspect this is just another "glitch" in the system. I could be wrong, but I believe they are working to resolve the issues.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Danp
                    last edited by

                    @Danp said:

                    I suspect this is just another "glitch" in the system. I could be wrong, but I believe they are working to resolve the issues.

                    That's now how it appears. The network outage was by choice - they claimed redundancy but chose not to use it (now they are using that lack of redundancy as marketing to get people to the newer service.) The crippling of power cycles and images was intentional.

                    There is no "trying" going on. They are making choices to have the system not work. They are working to CAUSE the issues, not to resolve them.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      And, just like with the network outage, no responses when people point out that their service is down. They talk a lot when things are okay. The moment that there is an issue, total silence.

                      DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DanpD
                        Danp @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        Agreed on the lack of communications. I don't know if the missing "reimage" option is intentional or inadvertent due to the addition of the migrate feature. Only time will tell.

                        They've been advertising the CloudPro option for a while now, so I suspect it was functional at some point.

                        scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @Danp
                          last edited by

                          @Danp said:

                          Agreed on the lack of communications. I don't know if the missing "reimage" option is intentional or inadvertent due to the addition of the migrate feature. Only time will tell.

                          They removed two critical features. There is no reasonable scenario where this is an accident. And no reasonable reason why they are not responding to customers complaining about it. Neither common sense nor their track record allow for a reasonable situation where this isn't intentional.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @Danp
                            last edited by

                            @Danp said:

                            They've been advertising the CloudPro option for a while now, so I suspect it was functional at some point.

                            They've been SELLING CloudatCost for a long time and just this morning announced that it was never production ready. So that something has been advertised by them does not suggest that they were planning on it working.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1 / 1
                            • First post
                              Last post