Nodeweaver
-
@scottalanmiller said in Nodeweaver:
@stacksofplates said in Nodeweaver:
Yes you were.
No, that's just false. You want me to be wrong, so you decided I have to be referring to something that I didn't mention that doesn't do it, even though there is something I mentioned already that does do it. Obviously I didn't say that all tech does it.
You took a post out of context that was totally unrelated where I had asked about Ubuntu and Fedora, and then applied it elsewhere.
Yes, those two use libvirt. But that was in reference to a specific statement, and immediately followed by comments about Proxmox doing this.
The thing you are then quoted here was related to Proxmox (and other options), not libvirt. You are cherry picking statements out of context to try to make it look like nothing else was discussed.
No. Let me quote you again:
Other than a unified interface to it, what does this give me that free Ubuntu or Fedora doesn't?
You said that in response to this:
I am in the process of installing it and giving it a try. The demo seems very good. A lot different then scale, you can map to local storage. Create virtual networks within the cluster, spin up certain application and have them load in a certain order. I would take a look at it and see try the demo.
Fedora/Ubuntu only ship with libvirt, which offers none of that (other than local storage), which is what I was saying. I said you didn't mention ProxMox in this regard until now. And as far as I know, ProxMox still does not offer specific application startup like vApp (and Nodeweaver).
edit: added the other than local storage because they obviously do have that
-
@scottalanmiller said in Nodeweaver:
@stacksofplates said in Nodeweaver:
However it's still not just plug a box in and you have a hyperconverged setup like Nodeweaver or SCALE.
Neither is Nodeweaver in this case. he's not talking about buying appliances, he's talking about installing software. So far more like Proxmox than dislike it.
No it offers auto load balancing of the host once the application is installed. So it's more like SCALE. I've been through a SCALE setup, it's not autodiscovery. You still need to tell it where the other hosts are even though the software is already installed.
-
@stacksofplates I have it installs and I was able to migrate my vm's from scale to this system. Seems very good and fast too. I like that you can mix and match hardware and it automatically levels off the diskspace. There are option to auto balance vm's. There are a lot more features then scale. The UI of scale is more user friendly.
You can create virtual networks inside the software. Create vlan, virtual switches without touch any of your networking equipment. Create templates based off your imports. That's what I got so far. I exported my Nextcloud server and imported it to Nodeweaver. Boots fast loads fast.
-
@mroth911 said in Nodeweaver:
@stacksofplates I have it installs and I was able to migrate my vm's from scale to this system. Seems very good and fast too. I like that you can mix and match hardware and it automatically levels off the diskspace. There are option to auto balance vm's. There are a lot more features then scale. The UI of scale is more user friendly.
You can create virtual networks inside the software. Create vlan, virtual switches without touch any of your networking equipment. Create templates based off your imports. That's what I got so far. I exported my Nextcloud server and imported it to Nodeweaver. Boots fast loads fast.
Can you unattach and reattach disks to VMs? That was a huge disappointment I had with Scale.
-
Yes you can. You don't have to reboot the VM. You can create Virtual Networks with one Gateway. There are a lot of option in this software that scale doesn't have. The main thing is that I can manage it. Every little thing I don't need to call them. I might sell my scale system. IDK .. its from 2016. Don't know what it's worth.
-
Found out Nodeweaver data structure is a fork off of Moose !
-
@mroth911 said in Nodeweaver:
Found out Nodeweaver data structure is a fork off of Moose !
By "found out", you mean I mentioned it a few times above, lol.
Moose is commercial, LizardFS is the fork off of it. Nodeweaver publicly says that they use LizardFS. That's why I keep asking how this is better than using Proxmox with LizardFS which is completely free and fully documented.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Nodeweaver:
Ah, they've updated stuff. This is what their site says: "NodeWeaver takes advantage of an extremely sophisticated and flexible storage layer, based largely on the LizardFS distributed filesystem, and capable of performing reliably and in an extremely efficient way even for small number of nodes and disk drives."
You can always do LizardFS yourself for free, just like Gluster or CEPH.
Here is the original spot where I quoted them saying that they were using LizardFS (a Moose fork).
-
I am going to setup Proxmox tonight with LizardFs and see what the big deal is with nodeweaver and see how it functions. I will write down documentation if need be so I can share it if others what to do it.
-
A guide to doing that would be great.
-
@mroth911 said in Nodeweaver:
I am going to setup Proxmox tonight with LizardFs and see what the big deal is with nodeweaver and see how it functions. I will write down documentation if need be so I can share it if others what to do it.
I was actually reading about Proxmox and LizardFS.
https://docs.lizardfs.com/cookbook/hypervisors.html#using-lizardfs-as-shared-storage-for-proxmoxve
