ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Pitney Bowes hit by crypto

    News
    crypto
    5
    5
    635
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      JaredBusch
      last edited by

      https://maintenance.pb.com/pbcom/outage.html

      Pitney Bowes was affected by a malware attack that encrypted information on some systems and disrupted customer access to our services. At this time, the company has seen no evidence that customer or employee data has been improperly accessed.
      Our technical team is working to restore the affected systems, and it is working closely with third-party consultants to address this matter. We are considering all options to expedite this process and we appreciate our customers’ patience as we work toward a resolution.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • D
        Dashrender
        last edited by

        WTH - how did that system get compromised? I mean - if it was directly compromised and encrypted - but you almost never hear about situations like that.. instead you hear someone got phished, and then encrypted... which brings the question - why wasn't prod network separate enough to prevent this?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • 1
          1337
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said in Pitney Bowes hit by crypto:

          why wasn't prod network separate enough to prevent this?

          Because nothing is separate enough. Not even an air-gapped system.

          Every security measure can be defeated and the ransomware guys makes millions so they have the resources to put some man hours into it.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • D
            DimS
            last edited by

            Well, if the backups were stored off-site, a single days worth of data could have been the only loss there, which is the exact schedule they should be made for a service provider of their scale.

            S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • S
              scottalanmiller @DimS
              last edited by

              @DimS said in Pitney Bowes hit by crypto:

              Well, if the backups were stored off-site, a single days worth of data could have been the only loss there, which is the exact schedule they should be made for a service provider of their scale.

              Hell yeah, this is a major company with gobs of customer data.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post