ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    edgerouteredgerouter 4colocationit supportvpnzerotier
    82 Posts 7 Posters 7.0k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
      last edited by

      @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

      It's probably not a bad idea to at least speak w the pfSense folks.

      It's always a bad idea to ask a vendor a question like this. Always.

      FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • FATeknollogeeF
        FATeknollogee @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

        It's always a bad idea to ask a vendor a question like this. Always.

        If I chose to go this route, I def wouldn't use their appliance.
        My question for them would be: what hardware & encryption levels are needed to achieve 500+ Mbps?
        DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20191006055301.png

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
          last edited by

          @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

          My question for them would be: what hardware & encryption levels are needed to achieve 500+ Mbps?

          I doubt that pfSense provides that kind of consulting if you aren't buying their stuff.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            I'd use VyOS before pfSense for this.

            FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
            • FATeknollogeeF
              FATeknollogee @scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

              VyOS

              Ok, will check it out!

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                last edited by

                @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                @scottalanmiller said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                VyOS

                Ok, will check it out!

                Linux based router OS. Built from the same original code that EdgeOS comes from.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 1
                  1337
                  last edited by 1337

                  @FATeknollogee
                  I did a test. I get 840 Mbps IPsec between two servers running xcp-ng and one pfSense in each. 4 vCPU 2.5GHz Xeon E5.
                  This was over 1GbE and with NAT, packet filtering, I/O overhead of Xen etc.

                  I expected more but was too lazy to try on bare metal. But I would assume it's faster, also a newer CPU with higher clock frequencies would likely give it another boost.

                  If you want a lot more speed you can add an accelerator card. Intel has their Quick Assist Technology and a card that can do up to 50 Gbps is priced around $650.

                  FATeknollogeeF 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • FATeknollogeeF
                    FATeknollogee @1337
                    last edited by

                    @Pete-S pfSense? What did you test with?

                    DashrenderD JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @FATeknollogee
                      last edited by

                      @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                      @Pete-S pfSense? What did you test with?

                      I would guess from his wording - two xcp-ng hosts, each with a PFSense VM, directly connected to each other, this would take the ISP out of the equation and show max throughput for his given setup (4 vCPU, no RAM listed).

                      1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @FATeknollogee
                        last edited by

                        @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                        @Pete-S pfSense? What did you test with?

                        iperf is the standard tool for this.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • 1
                          1337 @Dashrender
                          last edited by 1337

                          @Dashrender said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @Pete-S pfSense? What did you test with?

                          I would guess from his wording - two xcp-ng hosts, each with a PFSense VM, directly connected to each other, this would take the ISP out of the equation and show max throughput for his given setup (4 vCPU, no RAM listed).

                          Yes. And it was 2GB RAM.

                          @JaredBusch said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                          @Pete-S pfSense? What did you test with?

                          iperf is the standard tool for this.

                          Correct. iperf (v3.6) with a couple of parallel streams.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • FATeknollogeeF
                            FATeknollogee @1337
                            last edited by

                            @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                            @FATeknollogee
                            I did a test. I get 840 Mbps IPsec between two servers running xcp-ng and one pfSense in each. 4 vCPU 2.5GHz Xeon E5.
                            This was over 1GbE and with NAT, packet filtering, I/O overhead of Xen etc.

                            I expected more but was too lazy to try on bare metal. But I would assume it's faster, also a newer CPU with higher clock frequencies would likely give it another boost.

                            If you want a lot more speed you can add an accelerator card. Intel has their Quick Assist Technology and a card that can do up to 50 Gbps is priced around $650.

                            How much RAM?
                            Did you check CPU usage?

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                              last edited by

                              @FATeknollogee said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @Pete-S said in Co-lo + 5 (or more) sites....connect 'em all:

                              @FATeknollogee
                              I did a test. I get 840 Mbps IPsec between two servers running xcp-ng and one pfSense in each. 4 vCPU 2.5GHz Xeon E5.
                              This was over 1GbE and with NAT, packet filtering, I/O overhead of Xen etc.

                              I expected more but was too lazy to try on bare metal. But I would assume it's faster, also a newer CPU with higher clock frequencies would likely give it another boost.

                              If you want a lot more speed you can add an accelerator card. Intel has their Quick Assist Technology and a card that can do up to 50 Gbps is priced around $650.

                              How much RAM?
                              Did you check CPU usage?

                              I think that he said 2GB.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • FATeknollogeeF
                                FATeknollogee
                                last edited by FATeknollogee

                                Update: this is what I ended up with.
                                Route based VPN using this guide as a template.

                                Master site: 1x ER 12 + 1x ER 4
                                Sites A, B, C & D :1x ER4 each location
                                Colo: 1x ER4 & 1x pfSense (SM x10SDV-TLN4F+)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • 1
                                • 2
                                • 3
                                • 4
                                • 5
                                • 4 / 5
                                • First post
                                  Last post