Meeting software - how do you handle it?
-
@Dashrender said in Meeting software - how do you handle it?:
situation is to leave or just deal with it.
Those aren't the only choices, you can say hey boss, this isn't magic, smoke and mirrors. Click the link that says "Join with your browser".
If she is incapable of reading the content directly in her face, she has much bigger issues to worry about. Like which foot operates the break pedal. . .
-
@Dashrender said in Meeting software - how do you handle it?:
@DustinB3403 said in Meeting software - how do you handle it?:
@scottalanmiller said in Meeting software - how do you handle it?:
@DustinB3403 said in Meeting software - how do you handle it?:
Her dilemma is she is *&(!^%#0 inept at how computers work. How should Dash fix that?
And she is the head of IT. If we describe IT as needing to interpret, why does that apply to the underlying but not the IT decision maker? The logic doesn't hold up.
Exactly!
Just because Dash is in a position of break/fix/jump when she says jump doesn't mean that he can't tell his boss that she's a flipping loony-toon who needs to re-evaluate the issue.
Fix it in this context is "make it so I never have to think about joining any web conferencing system ever again". Which can be resolved by him showing up 5 minutes ahead of every meeting and joining it for her. But is that really a fix?
No! Teach the dumbass how to fish, rather than giving her a fish.
As much as @scottalanmiller will call her the head of IT, which I don't disagree with, those people simply never do see themselves that way, .....
Right, making it worse.
-
@Dashrender said in Meeting software - how do you handle it?:
and my only choice in this situation is to leave or just deal with it.
The problem with leaving is obvious, trying to find same or better pay and benefits.
The problem with staying is that what is suggested, and has to be in a case where we are treating the head of IT like an insolent child who is dishonest, illogical and emotional and failing to do their own job, is that we step away from being professional and have to be condescending, that's what is recommended. All the "do what they want, not what they say" is a form of condescension "oh, they are too stupid to talk to us IT pros, so we feed them a trick rather than doing what our job tells us to do" or whatever. It's an option, but it is also a problem. Once the head of IT is to be treated as a clueless, emotional user, all logic goes out the window. When do we do this... when they set the job requirement? When they ask for a specific task? We start picking and choosing because the "don't listen to them" can be applied at any time.
-
Right, if you have to treat your supervisor like an inept buffoon, then do you listen to anything that they tell you to do? If they tell you to install a piece of software do you disregard it because that software is a joke in your opinion and just assume there would be no repercussion of it?
First, you boss needs to act like an adult, and start reading and comprehending the world in which she lives.
Second, your boss needs to stop treating her employees like gophers.
-
@Dashrender said in Meeting software - how do you handle it?:
My boss had an online meeting today - and of course this presenter wanted to use Skype, plain ol' Skype, not Skype for Business.
Skype for Business is installed on Windows 10 by default (which I have not removed) but seemingly, Skype for Business will only allow logons from MS business accounts (which I suppose makes sense).
So - my boss couldn't do her meeting because she was missing the needed software.So let's get back to the original issue...
-
Only the boss can determine what software she is going to allow. Nothing that she says, requires, demands, etc. matter, because she's the boss and her actual decision is what goes. Period. No amount of IT banter in this forum can change that, it's fact. Your only way to change this, is to get her removed. So if "do what is needed, instead of what is said" is done, then obviously the correct action is to get her fired. That's not going to happen, so let's not talk like that's an option. She's the boss, she makes the rules, and using these products are her decision, end of story.
-
Skype for Business isn't a factor here.
-
Your boss could do her meeting. That she didn't is, again, all on her. Yes, you can help here if she tells you what she has decided to use and asks you how to use it. But she wasn't missing software, she just didn't know how to use a product she agreed to use and presumably didn't ask for help early enough on it.
-
In this one case, the fix is training the head of IT how to use a web based Skype interface. That's easy if she is okay with that. This assumes many things, though, as it seems that many of the problems come from the boss being capricious and illogical. So any given fix may or may not make her happy, we can't tell.
-
In other cases, there is no universal answer. We fix this by not allowing other companies to dictate our software stack. Things like Skype are allowed specifically because they work in any browser. But things like Webex are not because... we simply don't have the infrastructure to make them work and it is on the vendor to provide viable systems.
At the end of the day, she is the boss and her actions not her words are her actual rules. Words that conflict with actions aren't your mandate, they cannot be.
-
