Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?
-
@krisleslie said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
It feels like it isn't smart, but in some cases it is and some it is a challenge.
Nearly all. There are exceptions, but the "stall all in the same building" thing is almost always super expensive, super un-productive, and a crutch for hiring staff that are actually not able to work without being prodded by a manager. If your staff is good, they don't need to be managed. Managed staff is expensive staff. Motivated staff is cheap.
It should feel brilliant to not have staff all in one building. What would cause the cost of real estate, the risks of housing staff, and the inefficiencies of workplace banter to sound like positives?
Employees love working in offices because they make it easy to use "showing up" as a proxy for "working". People who work from home only look like they are working when they are... actually working. Totally different.
Management should love people being home. Workers who want to work should love being home. People who want to collect a paycheck for talking aroudn the water cooler are the ones who promote the office environment in most cases.
-
@obsolesce IMHO it depends on the scale, financial health and overall understanding of a company at every level. I can say if your a startup with 1-5 people, having outsourced IT is smart. I can say up to 100 staff, having outsourced IT in different roles/capacities is smart. But it all depends on the financial health of the company.
I agree with Scott as far as the mindset of a business and what steps they should take to focus on the priorities and "make it happen". But if you have little budget, little can be done in some scenarios until you grow and have cash flow to support it.
-
@obsolesce said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
@scottalanmiller said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
@dashrender said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
This flexibility can cost a bit more (frankly I have no idea how much more), but from the postings around these parts, some seem to think the cost would be pretty small.
"Can" cost more, but I never see it. It's less in the cases I see. Find me ANY FTE company, and I'll show you outsourcing for less than the in house costs. Every time. I challenge anyone to find an exception.
Are there exceptions? Yes, of course. But they are insanely rare and as rare as they are, they are almost always someone volunteering.
The idea that MSPs cost more comes from one of two misunderstandings:
- Refusing to look at good MSPs and only going for local firms that know that they can price gouge based on the local fallacy.
- Refusing to use the MSP for equal work and demanding the MSP be dramatically more than the internal resource was. Nothing wrong with this, but obviously this make it difficult or impossible to be cheaper.
So, FTE companies should never have internal IT? Always outsource to MSPs?
Absolutely. I've covered this a lot. The MSP model is so vastly superior to in house staff that is non-core (so this applies to IT, HR, Accouting, etc.) that it should never come up to consider FTEs until you are in the Fortune 1000.
Outsouced staff can meet or beat internal in every way. People often think outsourced has downsides, but can never actually produce any. There are all kinds of misunderstandings about outsourced that people use as reasons, but the reasons are universally false.
-
@krisleslie said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
@obsolesce IMHO it depends on the scale, financial health and overall understanding of a company at every level. I can say if your a startup with 1-5 people, having outsourced IT is smart. I can say up to 100 staff, having outsourced IT in different roles/capacities is smart. But it all depends on the financial health of the company.
In house IT staff only makes sense if...
- Your team is SO large that no MSP can match it.
- IT is your core business so is handled under the "in house core, out source all else" rule.
-
@krisleslie said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
But if you have little budget, little can be done in some scenarios until you grow and have cash flow to support it.
But since the MSP model is cheaper, companies with small budgets should always outsource.
FTEs are for the rich that want to flaunt their ability to hire headcount.
MSPs are for frugal companies wanting to improve the bottom line.
-
@scottalanmiller it just depends. One harsh example would be cabling. If you hired a contractor, msp, or someone who is the IT (locally and FTE), who do you think would end up being cheaper? Always the local if he/she has done it before. The labor, equipment and resources cost always sky rockets!
-
@scottalanmiller said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
Your team is SO large that no MSP can match it.
The only place I can think of will make sense would be Universities.
-
@black3dynamite just depends. If I throw this as a curveball to the situation, a Facebook engineer handles between 100k-1 Million servers on average. So surely he should get paid more right? But that isn't always the case.
-
@black3dynamite said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
@scottalanmiller said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
Your team is SO large that no MSP can match it.
The only place I can think of will make sense would be Universities.
Why? They should want to save money and get more work done, too.
-
@krisleslie said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
@scottalanmiller it just depends. One harsh example would be cabling. If you hired a contractor, msp, or someone who is the IT (locally and FTE), who do you think would end up being cheaper? Always the local if he/she has done it before. The labor, equipment and resources cost always sky rockets!
There is no "it depends". That's a key here, if it feels like there is an exception, then something has been missed, because there are no exceptions.
In your harsh examples there are many flaws:
- Cabling is not IT, it's electrical. Still follows the outsourced rule, but not to an MSP, but to an electrician.
- Do you really think that an apples to apples certified, bonded electrician on your staff as an FTE is cheaper than bringing one in on an hourly basis as needed? Heck no.
- Union rules often don't even give you a choice here.
- Equipment and resources are very expensive, so a company where they use them all day, every day and you get them for an hour is a fraction of the cost of buying unused spools of cable, training and certifying an electrical staff, meeting fire codes, self insuring, buying loads of equipment to just sit idle 99% of the time would be vastly more expensive.
I don't see any depends. If your staff can do this apples to apples, they are insanely costly in house. If they can't, it's not even a comparison. So I see this as a 100% solid case to demonstrate "there are no exceptions, don't in source this stuff."
-
@krisleslie said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
@black3dynamite just depends. If I throw this as a curveball to the situation, a Facebook engineer handles between 100k-1 Million servers on average. So surely he should get paid more right? But that isn't always the case.
I don't think that taht is the average
-
@krisleslie said in Anyone Attempting Deploying Printers through SaltStack?:
But if you have little budget, little can be done in some scenarios until you grow and have cash flow to support it.
Simple rule of thumb, if you are big and rich enough to consider a single FTE in any department, then you should be so large and so good that you are taking that department off as a profit center providing services to other companies.
So in IT terms, if you are considering hiring an FTE, it should always be because you are in the process of building your own MSP.
-
@scottalanmiller Which I agree to, which is what we have done.
