Shortened URLs
-
I think it seems reasonable under the assumption that people use social media for business stuff, understand that there is a trust validation system, follow up on that, and care. It's a lot of ifs. Is it okay under that circumstance? Sure, seems reasonable. Are there people that really do all those things? Doesn't seem reasonable. What is the profile of a person that does this?
-
Well, in this particular example, the profile would be a person who follows a company on social media. Either for special (HEY!! Kid's shoes are BOGO!) or for content updates (read all about this great new SMBIT article).
-
Shortened URLs are just a redirect...
-
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
Well, in this particular example, the profile would be a person who follows a company on social media. Either for special (HEY!! Kid's shoes are BOGO!) or for content updates (read all about this great new SMBIT article).
Yeah, as a consumer, if I was following some company on social media for coupons and discounts, I would expect to encounter shortened URL and I would follow them assuming they were an internal shortener from the vendor and not a tinyurl or some public shortener.
-
That said, most consumers would just click on anything put out by the person/company they are following.
-
@jaredbusch said in Shortened URLs:
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
Well, in this particular example, the profile would be a person who follows a company on social media. Either for special (HEY!! Kid's shoes are BOGO!) or for content updates (read all about this great new SMBIT article).
Yeah, as a consumer, if I was following some company on social media for coupons and discounts, I would expect to encounter shortened URL and I would follow them assuming they were an internal shortener from the vendor and not a tinyurl or some public shortener.
Out of curiosity, why would you trust an internal shortener as opposed to a public one?
Just wondering where the trust breakdown is.
-
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@jaredbusch said in Shortened URLs:
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
Well, in this particular example, the profile would be a person who follows a company on social media. Either for special (HEY!! Kid's shoes are BOGO!) or for content updates (read all about this great new SMBIT article).
Yeah, as a consumer, if I was following some company on social media for coupons and discounts, I would expect to encounter shortened URL and I would follow them assuming they were an internal shortener from the vendor and not a tinyurl or some public shortener.
Out of curiosity, why would you trust an internal shortener as opposed to a public one?
Just wondering where the trust breakdown is.
If it is internally done by a trusted company or entity, and it goes somewhere malicious or whatever, I feel like I have more recourse against that company because they have more to lose from the potentially bad PR that would come from using their internal shortened links for evil. Public shortener sites probably don't care if I bash them on social media, Target (or whomever) likely does care.
-
@rojoloco said in Shortened URLs:
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@jaredbusch said in Shortened URLs:
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
Well, in this particular example, the profile would be a person who follows a company on social media. Either for special (HEY!! Kid's shoes are BOGO!) or for content updates (read all about this great new SMBIT article).
Yeah, as a consumer, if I was following some company on social media for coupons and discounts, I would expect to encounter shortened URL and I would follow them assuming they were an internal shortener from the vendor and not a tinyurl or some public shortener.
Out of curiosity, why would you trust an internal shortener as opposed to a public one?
Just wondering where the trust breakdown is.
If it is internally done by a trusted company or entity, and it goes somewhere malicious or whatever, I feel like I have more recourse against that company because they have more to lose from the potentially bad PR that would come from using their internal shortened links for evil. Public shortener sites probably don't care if I bash them on social media, Target (or whomever) likely does care.
So you are saying you don't try, say, bit.ly not to have the link compromised?
-
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@rojoloco said in Shortened URLs:
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@jaredbusch said in Shortened URLs:
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
Well, in this particular example, the profile would be a person who follows a company on social media. Either for special (HEY!! Kid's shoes are BOGO!) or for content updates (read all about this great new SMBIT article).
Yeah, as a consumer, if I was following some company on social media for coupons and discounts, I would expect to encounter shortened URL and I would follow them assuming they were an internal shortener from the vendor and not a tinyurl or some public shortener.
Out of curiosity, why would you trust an internal shortener as opposed to a public one?
Just wondering where the trust breakdown is.
If it is internally done by a trusted company or entity, and it goes somewhere malicious or whatever, I feel like I have more recourse against that company because they have more to lose from the potentially bad PR that would come from using their internal shortened links for evil. Public shortener sites probably don't care if I bash them on social media, Target (or whomever) likely does care.
So you are saying you don't try, say, bit.ly not to have the link compromised?
I try to avoid them all, but as a hypothetical, like Jared was describing, a company I follow or trust sends a sale offer/coupon/etc, if it has a shortened link, I'm more likely to trust it. I, personally, will unshorten it first, but only bother doing that if it's from somewhere I feel like I can totally trust. I will never click them when used for marketing and promotional purposes; I still use caution when it's for a sale price or special offer that I would probably trust.
-
I don't trust ANY shortened URL, even if it is from social media company I follow. Nothing to prevent some account takeover/compromise from posting a bad link so in each and every case, I unshorten the URL. Even if it is a company I trust and the link destination looks suspicious (ie: to some domain that doesn't seem to be associated with the company in question), I won't click on it. I also try to train everyone I know to do the same. I'm sure most don't.
-
@nashbrydges said
Nothing to prevent some account takeover/compromise from posting a bad link
As @scottalanmiller usually mentions in regards to backups if someone has admin access, what's to prevent them from just hacking a legitimate link if they have that kind of compromised access?
-
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@nashbrydges said
Nothing to prevent some account takeover/compromise from posting a bad link
As @scottalanmiller usually mentions in regards to backups if someone has admin access, what's to prevent them from just hacking a legitimate link if they have that kind of compromised access?
Lol. That would be a valid argument for every potential admin takeover however, given that there is NO way for anyone to know this, I will do what I can to verify that links I am clicking are valid. You could argue these details to the Nth degree but at some point you simply can't validate whether something is legit if someone has, as you say, hacked a legitimate link.
-
@rojoloco said
I try to avoid them all, but as a hypothetical, like Jared was describing, a company I follow or trust sends a sale offer/coupon/etc, if it has a shortened link, I'm more likely to trust it. I, personally, will unshorten it first, but only bother doing that if it's from somewhere I feel like I can totally trust. I will never click them when used for marketing and promotional purposes; I still use caution when it's for a sale price or special offer that I would probably trust.
So people trying to gain marketing data on you have no shot!
I am the same way, I usually take off the Google tracking stuff.
For me personally, I am just trying to figure out the best way to track effectiveness of various social media outlets.
-
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@rojoloco said
I try to avoid them all, but as a hypothetical, like Jared was describing, a company I follow or trust sends a sale offer/coupon/etc, if it has a shortened link, I'm more likely to trust it. I, personally, will unshorten it first, but only bother doing that if it's from somewhere I feel like I can totally trust. I will never click them when used for marketing and promotional purposes; I still use caution when it's for a sale price or special offer that I would probably trust.
So people trying to gain marketing data on you have no shot!
I am the same way, I usually take off the Google tracking stuff.
For me personally, I am just trying to figure out the best way to track effectiveness of various social media outlets.
It's not that I am against marketing gaining some insight into what works and what doesn't. It's just that the risks are greater than I'm willing to commit to. I certainly appreciate they are just trying to do their job but I'm also trying to do mine.
If I'm really wanting to track social media success, then I choose to NOT post shortened URLs.
The other option is that, if you control the site, you could setup Piwik to track the source of your visits and even tag the links with specific marketing campaign codes to directly tie back to a specific campaign (assuming you have more than one campaign running on social media which could easily be true). That's the method I recommend to my clients who market via social media.
-
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@rojoloco said
I try to avoid them all, but as a hypothetical, like Jared was describing, a company I follow or trust sends a sale offer/coupon/etc, if it has a shortened link, I'm more likely to trust it. I, personally, will unshorten it first, but only bother doing that if it's from somewhere I feel like I can totally trust. I will never click them when used for marketing and promotional purposes; I still use caution when it's for a sale price or special offer that I would probably trust.
So people trying to gain marketing data on you have no shot!
I am the same way, I usually take off the Google tracking stuff.
For me personally, I am just trying to figure out the best way to track effectiveness of various social media outlets.
What do short links have to do with tracking? Is there something special through that?
-
@dashrender said in Shortened URLs:
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@rojoloco said
I try to avoid them all, but as a hypothetical, like Jared was describing, a company I follow or trust sends a sale offer/coupon/etc, if it has a shortened link, I'm more likely to trust it. I, personally, will unshorten it first, but only bother doing that if it's from somewhere I feel like I can totally trust. I will never click them when used for marketing and promotional purposes; I still use caution when it's for a sale price or special offer that I would probably trust.
So people trying to gain marketing data on you have no shot!
I am the same way, I usually take off the Google tracking stuff.
For me personally, I am just trying to figure out the best way to track effectiveness of various social media outlets.
What do short links have to do with tracking? Is there something special through that?
Seriously?
-
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@rojoloco said
I try to avoid them all, but as a hypothetical, like Jared was describing, a company I follow or trust sends a sale offer/coupon/etc, if it has a shortened link, I'm more likely to trust it. I, personally, will unshorten it first, but only bother doing that if it's from somewhere I feel like I can totally trust. I will never click them when used for marketing and promotional purposes; I still use caution when it's for a sale price or special offer that I would probably trust.
So people trying to gain marketing data on you have no shot!
Why do you need special links for that?
-
@dashrender said in Shortened URLs:
@brrabill said in Shortened URLs:
@rojoloco said
I try to avoid them all, but as a hypothetical, like Jared was describing, a company I follow or trust sends a sale offer/coupon/etc, if it has a shortened link, I'm more likely to trust it. I, personally, will unshorten it first, but only bother doing that if it's from somewhere I feel like I can totally trust. I will never click them when used for marketing and promotional purposes; I still use caution when it's for a sale price or special offer that I would probably trust.
So people trying to gain marketing data on you have no shot!
I am the same way, I usually take off the Google tracking stuff.
For me personally, I am just trying to figure out the best way to track effectiveness of various social media outlets.
What do short links have to do with tracking? Is there something special through that?
They shorted all of the detailed tracking info. That's primarily why they are used, to let the person put loads and loads of information into the link but not make it obvious to you clicking on it what all they just conveyed about you.
-
@nashbrydges said in Shortened URLs:
If I'm really wanting to track social media success, then I choose to NOT post shortened URLs.
Exactly - there are other ways to know where you're coming from besides the use of shortened URLs. Heck, I'd argue that you'd use those ways even if Shortened URLs are/willing to give you that data. This can be completely controlled by you by providing that information in the long URL that the short one comes from.
Just means more work on your side..and all of this is coming from someone who has no clue what he's talking about.
-
@dashrender said in Shortened URLs:
Shortened URLs are/willing to give you that data.
Seriously WTF?
This is not how any of this works.
