What Are You Doing Right Now
-
Looks like the issue is GTK.
-
@scottalanmiller You're beating me to the punch with resources, but saving me a good bit of time.
-
You could try a different desktop environment, I've not played with much scaling. Not sure how KDE does.
-
@scottalanmiller That's what I'm considering. There are many options, and I have to remember that this is day 2 of being a non-server-CLI-only Linux user.
-
@EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller That's what I'm considering. There are many options, and I have to remember that this is day 2 of being a non-server-CLI-only Linux user.
It's fun being in the cool kids' club, isn't it
-
@scottalanmiller No kidding! I just installed KDE's Plasma. It seems to rock so far!
-
@EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller No kidding! I just installed KDE's Plasma. It seems to rock so far!
Plasma is pretty nice. I prefer Cinnamon, but both are very good. Gecko Linux does an exceptionally good job with the Plasma desktop.
-
I use XFCE sometimes, too. And Korora really makes a good XFCE experience. It doesn't feel like XFCE anywhere else.
-
@scottalanmiller HP ProBook 4730s
-
@scottalanmiller Plasma seems to be handling scaling well.
-
@EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller Plasma seems to be handling scaling well.
Plasma is built on top of Qt which is more advanced compared to GTK. Gives it an edge.
-
@RestoronixSean said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
HP ProBook 4730s
Looks like people have had success with both Fedora and Mint on there.
-
@EddieJennings Well, I guess I'll have to come home then!
@scottalanmiller was showing it to me when I was over at his place. It looked really clean. -
@RestoronixSean said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@EddieJennings Well, I guess I'll have to come home then!
@scottalanmiller was showing it to me when I was over at his place. It looked really clean.I have big monitors, makes 1080p seem large.
-
This guy is definitely the new Curtis. He's been like this for a few weeks.
-
Hours and hours of him arguing about RAID 6 being safer than RAID 60. Then it turns out he doesn't even know what RAID 0 is.
-
@scottalanmiller Even I know what RAID 0 is: Stripe across X drives. If one drive fails, the RAID fails. Guy must be t3h n00b.
Edit: Span to stripe -- no, really, I understand
-
@EddieJennings said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
@scottalanmiller Even I know what RAID 0 is: Span across X drives. If one drive fails, the RAID fails. Guy must be t3h n00b.
Stripe across, not span across. Span wouldn't give you extra speed.
-
@scottalanmiller Yep. Right after hitting submit I saw span instead of stripe. Then I heard the ML ding before I could click edit. <troll fail>
-
Yeah, it turns out that the OP was actually asking if one drive in RAID 0 failing caused the array to fail. He just asked it in a really convoluted way of asking about RAID 6 arrays and RAID 60. He added in all this useless detail and didn't state the actual question or not well enough to make it obvious. So the whole thread was just meant to ask if one drive in RAID 0 failed, would the whole thing fail.
But then this Alex character got in there arguing about how RAID 60 was dangerous because it took the safety of RAID 6 and made it worse, which is mathematically impossible given how it works. Which I showed and he responded by calling math a theory and that risk analysis were opinions.
