The power of Chat in IT Support
-
Ticketing systems seem to work best for everyone in a high-user SMB with a small IT department... everyone wins. Issues get seen by the entire IT department, can be distributed appropriately, and users can track them.
A stop in the hallway only results in one IT tech being exposed to the issue, most likely interrupting them on their way to do something else, and most likely being forgotten.
I can see that chat could get just as distracting as door-knocks, walk-ins, and phone-calls.
-
@Tim_G said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
Ticketing systems seem to work best for everyone in a high-user SMB with a small IT department... everyone wins. Issues get seen by the entire IT department, can be distributed appropriately, and users can track them.
A stop in the hallway only results in one IT tech being exposed to the issue, most likely interrupting them on their way to do something else, and most likely being forgotten.
I can see that chat could get just as distracting as door-knocks, walk-ins, and phone-calls.
At my last job, we used Chat mainly for internal communication between folks in the department.
-
@Tim_G OK, got your point and see its validity. But what about when you are servicing multiple, remote SMB customers with a team of 3+ support guys?
-
@bogdan.moldovan said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@Tim_G OK, got your point and see its validity. But what about when you are servicing multiple, remote SMB customers with a team of 3+ support guys?
If it's your job to take chat support requests, then great. That's probably better than tickets if it's not too busy, or if people aren't waiting too long for chat support. Chat would be good for resolving issues right away in real-time on a one-on-one basis.
But if you need to do other things, or actively focus on other tasks without a lot of distraction, then at least to me, tickets make the most sense.
-
@bogdan.moldovan said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@Tim_G OK, got your point and see its validity. But what about when you are servicing multiple, remote SMB customers with a team of 3+ support guys?
We use Rocket.Chat. It's awesome.
-
@scottalanmiller we are looking at it to integrate it with @axigen. Good product indeed!
-
@scottalanmiller said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@bogdan.moldovan said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@Tim_G OK, got your point and see its validity. But what about when you are servicing multiple, remote SMB customers with a team of 3+ support guys?
We use Rocket.Chat. It's awesome.
For internal communicaiton. What about external with the clients.
That, I think, is the point of this thread. How useful is IM for the public facing side?
-
We use skype extensively to chat as an organization and it's very valuable.
Having said that, Skype is a steaming turd after the last changes w/ account creation & management.
-
@JaredBusch said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@scottalanmiller said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@bogdan.moldovan said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@Tim_G OK, got your point and see its validity. But what about when you are servicing multiple, remote SMB customers with a team of 3+ support guys?
We use Rocket.Chat. It's awesome.
For internal communicaiton. What about external with the clients.
That, I think, is the point of this thread. How useful is IM for the public facing side?
I would think it completely depends on your support model.
Do you have someone manning a desk for one-on-one chat support from start to issue resolved, creating a ticket to escalate it (to someone else, non-chat support tech or an engineer) if it can't be resolved in good time via chat?
-
@JaredBusch @scottalanmiller uses the livechat feauture from rocket.chat for external customers.
-
@bogdan.moldovan said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@scottalanmiller we are looking at it to integrate it with @axigen. Good product indeed!
Oh that's awesome.
-
@MattSpeller said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
We use skype extensively to chat as an organization and it's very valuable.
Having said that, Skype is a steaming turd after the last changes w/ account creation & management.
Skype for Business or regular Skype?
-
@JaredBusch said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@scottalanmiller said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@bogdan.moldovan said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@Tim_G OK, got your point and see its validity. But what about when you are servicing multiple, remote SMB customers with a team of 3+ support guys?
We use Rocket.Chat. It's awesome.
For internal communicaiton. What about external with the clients.
That, I think, is the point of this thread. How useful is IM for the public facing side?
Rocket is great for that. It's external exposure for clients is quite powerful.
-
@wrx7m said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@MattSpeller said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
We use skype extensively to chat as an organization and it's very valuable.
Having said that, Skype is a steaming turd after the last changes w/ account creation & management.
Skype for Business or regular Skype?
Regular vanilla skype.
-
We use Skype for Business. It works well for us, if people remember to sign into it and use it.
Can't check out Rocket.chat at work because of IM. I hate AT&T firewalls.
-
@NerdyDad said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
We use Skype for Business. It works well for us, if people remember to sign into it and use it.
Can't check out Rocket.chat at work because of IM. I hate AT&T firewalls.
Umm... Can't check out Rocket Chat at work because of what?
-
@NerdyDad said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
We use Skype for Business. It works well for us, if people remember to sign into it and use it.
Can't check out Rocket.chat at work because of IM. I hate AT&T firewalls.
IM?
-
-
-
@dafyre said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
@NerdyDad said in The power of Chat in IT Support:
ROFL. You should talk to the IT guys about that.
I have, my boss. We're working iceberg slowly on getting away from AT&T's stupid firewalls.
