ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Fedora 25 Workstation | Server | Korora 25: what say you, ML'ers...

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    20 Posts 6 Posters 1.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FATeknollogeeF
      FATeknollogee
      last edited by

      Is there a Proxmox equivalent in the Fedora world?

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
        last edited by

        @FATeknollogee said in Fedora 25 Workstation | Server | Korora 25: what say you, ML'ers...:

        Is there a Proxmox equivalent in the Fedora world?

        What would qualify as a PM equivalent? All of the parts that make up PM are already there. But no project like PM to make a product out of it.

        FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • FATeknollogeeF
          FATeknollogee @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Fedora 25 Workstation | Server | Korora 25: what say you, ML'ers...:

          @FATeknollogee said in Fedora 25 Workstation | Server | Korora 25: what say you, ML'ers...:

          Is there a Proxmox equivalent in the Fedora world?

          What would qualify as a PM equivalent? All of the parts that make up PM are already there. But no project like PM to make a product out of it.

          Just like you said, more of a finished/packaged/ready-to-go kinda product.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • FATeknollogeeF
            FATeknollogee
            last edited by

            This might be an option, it seems like a lot of work!
            https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2017/04/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4-1-and-gluster-storage/

            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
              last edited by

              @FATeknollogee said in Fedora 25 Workstation | Server | Korora 25: what say you, ML'ers...:

              This might be an option, it seems like a lot of work!
              https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2017/04/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4-1-and-gluster-storage/

              And in the end.... Gluster.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • FATeknollogeeF
                FATeknollogee
                last edited by

                Why, Gluster no goodie?

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                  last edited by

                  @FATeknollogee said in Fedora 25 Workstation | Server | Korora 25: what say you, ML'ers...:

                  Why, Gluster no goodie?

                  A bit of a pain and not performing for this kind of workload.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • black3dynamiteB
                    black3dynamite
                    last edited by black3dynamite

                    For a free KVM hypervisor that can be managed from a web browser, proxmox is the easiest compare to ovirt. Ovirt is meant to be setup with an engine host and a storage node.

                    FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • FATeknollogeeF
                      FATeknollogee @black3dynamite
                      last edited by

                      @black3dynamite said in Fedora 25 Workstation | Server | Korora 25: what say you, ML'ers...:

                      For a free KVM hyper visit that can be managed from a web browser, proxmox is the easiest compare to ovirt. Ovirt is meant to be setup with an engine host and a storage node.

                      You are probably correct.
                      It would be nice to have one running off of Fedora instead of Debian.
                      oVirt seems like a lot of work to setup!

                      black3dynamiteB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • black3dynamiteB
                        black3dynamite @FATeknollogee
                        last edited by

                        @FATeknollogee said in Fedora 25 Workstation | Server | Korora 25: what say you, ML'ers...:

                        @black3dynamite said in Fedora 25 Workstation | Server | Korora 25: what say you, ML'ers...:

                        For a free KVM hyper visit that can be managed from a web browser, proxmox is the easiest compare to ovirt. Ovirt is meant to be setup with an engine host and a storage node.

                        You are probably correct.
                        It would be nice to have one running off of Fedora instead of Debian.
                        oVirt seems like a lot of work to setup!

                        Installing ovirt-engine requires answering some questions. And there is a storage node setup ISO that you use to install on a separate hardware.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          On my desktop I just enabled KVM and use virt-manager. no actual idea on what exact backend it uses to manage KVM. It is simple and once I added the Spice drivers to my Windows VM everything works great.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • JaredBuschJ
                            JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            I switched to Korora because I wanted Fedora and the Cinnamon desktop.

                            I like the Fedora/RHEL ecosystem over Debian. I looked at Mint because it uses Cinnamon, but it is so old.

                            Unlike @scottalanmiller, I will not migrate all the existing CentOS workloads I have out there because the management is manual. If I had a state system setup for all the various client systems it would be different, but I do not.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • 1 / 1
                            • First post
                              Last post