Random Thread - Anything Goes

[scottalanmiller]

[scottalanmiller]

[wirestyle22]

[wirestyle22]

Fire alarms just went off. Was outside for about 40 minutes but still don't know why.

[scottalanmiller]

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

Fire alarms just went off. Was outside for about 40 minutes but still don't know why.

Because the fire alarms went off.

[coliver]

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

Fire alarms just went off. Was outside for about 40 minutes but still don't know why.

Because the fire alarms went off.

Sounds legit.

[travisdh1]

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

Fire alarms just went off. Was outside for about 40 minutes but still don't know why.

Because the fire alarms went off.

I wish we had no experience with this at MangoCon.

[scottalanmiller]

@travisdh1 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

Fire alarms just went off. Was outside for about 40 minutes but still don't know why.

Because the fire alarms went off.

I wish we had no experience with this at MangoCon.

LOL. Touche.

[travisdh1]

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@travisdh1 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

Fire alarms just went off. Was outside for about 40 minutes but still don't know why.

Because the fire alarms went off.

I wish we had no experience with this at MangoCon.

LOL. Touche.

Someone has the raw video of my very own deer in the headlights look

[scottalanmiller]

@travisdh1 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@travisdh1 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

Fire alarms just went off. Was outside for about 40 minutes but still don't know why.

Because the fire alarms went off.

I wish we had no experience with this at MangoCon.

LOL. Touche.

Someone has the raw video of my very own deer in the headlights look

That would be @MarigabyFrias

[scottalanmiller]

[wirestyle22]

I have a vendor who will only use a Linux SCO image INSIDE of Cent OS 5 with ESX running. Is it possible to put CentOS 5 into hyper-V and then within that VM do all of the other stuff to essentially MAKE an SCO image compatible with something like Hyper-V?

[scottalanmiller]

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

I have a vendor who will only use a Linux SCO image INSIDE of Cent OS 5 with ESX running. Is it possible to put CentOS 5 into hyper-V and then within that VM do all of the other stuff to essentially MAKE an SCO image compatible with virtualization?

They put SCO Linux running on what hypervisor, on top of CentOS 5, on top of ESX? That's three ancient systems. None of those are new enough to consider. As bad as it is, having a triple nested system is so bad... it would be something like this...

Application
     |
SCO Linux
     |
VirtualBox
     |
 CentOS 5
     |
   ESX 3
     |
Hyper-V 2016

That's three hypervisors and two operating systems all to run one application.

[dafyre]

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

I have a vendor who will only use a Linux SCO image INSIDE of Cent OS 5 with ESX running. Is it possible to put CentOS 5 into hyper-V and then within that VM do all of the other stuff to essentially MAKE an SCO image compatible with virtualization?

They put SCO Linux running on what hypervisor, on top of CentOS 5, on top of ESX? That's three ancient systems. None of those are new enough to consider. As bad as it is, having a triple nested system is so bad... it would be something like this...

Application
     |
SCO Linux
     |
VirtualBox
     |
 CentOS 5
     |
   ESX 3
     |
Hyper-V 2016

That's three hypervisors and two operating systems all to run one application.

I thought 3-2-1 was a good thing?!

[wirestyle22]

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

I have a vendor who will only use a Linux SCO image INSIDE of Cent OS 5 with ESX running. Is it possible to put CentOS 5 into hyper-V and then within that VM do all of the other stuff to essentially MAKE an SCO image compatible with virtualization?

They put SCO Linux running on what hypervisor, on top of CentOS 5, on top of ESX? That's three ancient systems. None of those are new enough to consider. As bad as it is, having a triple nested system is so bad... it would be something like this...

Application
     |
SCO Linux
     |
VirtualBox
     |
 CentOS 5
     |
   ESX 3
     |
Hyper-V 2016

That's three hypervisors and two operating systems all to run one application.

The vendor essentially told me he doesn't know what hes doing. Our site was the "first time he's done this". The problem is the city will not move to another piece of software. They will not pay for it. It's so insanely old. We wanted to replicate it in Hyper-V but none of this is compatible.

[scottalanmiller]

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

I have a vendor who will only use a Linux SCO image INSIDE of Cent OS 5 with ESX running. Is it possible to put CentOS 5 into hyper-V and then within that VM do all of the other stuff to essentially MAKE an SCO image compatible with virtualization?

They put SCO Linux running on what hypervisor, on top of CentOS 5, on top of ESX? That's three ancient systems. None of those are new enough to consider. As bad as it is, having a triple nested system is so bad... it would be something like this...

Application
     |
SCO Linux
     |
VirtualBox
     |
 CentOS 5
     |
   ESX 3
     |
Hyper-V 2016

That's three hypervisors and two operating systems all to run one application.

The vendor essentially told me he doesn't know what hes doing. Our site was the "first time he's done this". The problem is the city will not move to another piece of software. They will not pay for it. It's so insanely old. We wanted to replicate it in Hyper-V but none of this is compatible.

I would... just not bother.

[dafyre]

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

I have a vendor who will only use a Linux SCO image INSIDE of Cent OS 5 with ESX running. Is it possible to put CentOS 5 into hyper-V and then within that VM do all of the other stuff to essentially MAKE an SCO image compatible with virtualization?

They put SCO Linux running on what hypervisor, on top of CentOS 5, on top of ESX? That's three ancient systems. None of those are new enough to consider. As bad as it is, having a triple nested system is so bad... it would be something like this...

Application
     |
SCO Linux
     |
VirtualBox
     |
 CentOS 5
     |
   ESX 3
     |
Hyper-V 2016

That's three hypervisors and two operating systems all to run one application.

The vendor essentially told me he doesn't know what hes doing. Our site was the "first time he's done this". The problem is the city will not move to another piece of software. They will not pay for it. It's so insanely old. We wanted to replicate it in Hyper-V but none of this is compatible.

And I was being sarcastic, if it was lost in the translation, lol.

[wirestyle22]

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

I have a vendor who will only use a Linux SCO image INSIDE of Cent OS 5 with ESX running. Is it possible to put CentOS 5 into hyper-V and then within that VM do all of the other stuff to essentially MAKE an SCO image compatible with virtualization?

They put SCO Linux running on what hypervisor, on top of CentOS 5, on top of ESX? That's three ancient systems. None of those are new enough to consider. As bad as it is, having a triple nested system is so bad... it would be something like this...

Application
     |
SCO Linux
     |
VirtualBox
     |
 CentOS 5
     |
   ESX 3
     |
Hyper-V 2016

That's three hypervisors and two operating systems all to run one application.

The vendor essentially told me he doesn't know what hes doing. Our site was the "first time he's done this". The problem is the city will not move to another piece of software. They will not pay for it. It's so insanely old. We wanted to replicate it in Hyper-V but none of this is compatible.

I would... just not bother.

This is the kind of stuff that drives me nuts in IT. You can't force people to make the right choice.

[scottalanmiller]

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

I have a vendor who will only use a Linux SCO image INSIDE of Cent OS 5 with ESX running. Is it possible to put CentOS 5 into hyper-V and then within that VM do all of the other stuff to essentially MAKE an SCO image compatible with virtualization?

They put SCO Linux running on what hypervisor, on top of CentOS 5, on top of ESX? That's three ancient systems. None of those are new enough to consider. As bad as it is, having a triple nested system is so bad... it would be something like this...

Application
     |
SCO Linux
     |
VirtualBox
     |
 CentOS 5
     |
   ESX 3
     |
Hyper-V 2016

That's three hypervisors and two operating systems all to run one application.

The vendor essentially told me he doesn't know what hes doing. Our site was the "first time he's done this". The problem is the city will not move to another piece of software. They will not pay for it. It's so insanely old. We wanted to replicate it in Hyper-V but none of this is compatible.

I would... just not bother.

This is the kind of stuff that drives me nuts in IT. You can't force people to make the right choice.

Nor is it your concern. It should not drive you crazy. Your role is to recommend the best option for the mission statement. Their job is to determine if they agree. That's it. Your concern should end at the recommendation. The moment you care beyond that, you are no longer acting in the IT capacity but as a proxy investor.

[wirestyle22]

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@scottalanmiller said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

@wirestyle22 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:

I have a vendor who will only use a Linux SCO image INSIDE of Cent OS 5 with ESX running. Is it possible to put CentOS 5 into hyper-V and then within that VM do all of the other stuff to essentially MAKE an SCO image compatible with virtualization?

They put SCO Linux running on what hypervisor, on top of CentOS 5, on top of ESX? That's three ancient systems. None of those are new enough to consider. As bad as it is, having a triple nested system is so bad... it would be something like this...

Application
     |
SCO Linux
     |
VirtualBox
     |
 CentOS 5
     |
   ESX 3
     |
Hyper-V 2016

That's three hypervisors and two operating systems all to run one application.

The vendor essentially told me he doesn't know what hes doing. Our site was the "first time he's done this". The problem is the city will not move to another piece of software. They will not pay for it. It's so insanely old. We wanted to replicate it in Hyper-V but none of this is compatible.

I would... just not bother.

This is the kind of stuff that drives me nuts in IT. You can't force people to make the right choice.

Nor is it your concern. It should not drive you crazy. Your role is to recommend the best option for the mission statement. Their job is to determine if they agree. That's it. Your concern should end at the recommendation. The moment you care beyond that, you are no longer acting in the IT capacity but as a proxy investor.

It's hard for me to do my job well but also not care. Seems contradictory.