ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    What Linux Are You Running

    IT Discussion
    unix linux
    26
    42
    4.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • brianlittlejohnB
      brianlittlejohn
      last edited by

      Couple of CentOS 7 and a couple Ubuntu Boxes

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • RojoLocoR
        RojoLoco
        last edited by

        My Ubiquiti NVR runs Debian Wheezy.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • wirestyle22W
          wirestyle22
          last edited by wirestyle22

          CentOS 7 only currently

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • RamblingBipedR
            RamblingBiped @stacksofplates
            last edited by

            @stacksofplates The problem is never their code, it is always insufficient resources. More hardware(or vms/containers) is always the solution!

            We try to design things small and scale upward in a distributed fashion as demand increases. If a pair of servers can't cope we spin another up and add it to the load balancer. We've got load balancers, message queues, and distributed databases in every nook and cranny.

            stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • jrcJ
              jrc
              last edited by

              For servers I go with Ubuntu Server. Most are running 14, though one or two are 16. We do have one or two CentOS servers, but they were put in place before my time.

              For Desktops, I am partial to Ubuntu with the Cinnamon UI, but I spend most of my day in OS X at work and Windows 7 at home. But my work Macbook is due for replacement, so I am considering a high end PC laptop and switching to Ubuntu full time.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • bbigfordB
                bbigford @scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                @scottalanmiller said in What Linux Are You Running:

                Somestimes I think about moving to Fedora more than CentOS due to how we work.

                100% CentOS, about 95% of those are on 6. Just out of curiosity, what kind of workload for Fedora? I've honestly never understood it as a server.

                ObsolesceO 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stacksofplatesS
                  stacksofplates @RamblingBiped
                  last edited by

                  @RamblingBiped said in What Linux Are You Running:

                  @stacksofplates The problem is never their code, it is always insufficient resources. More hardware(or vms/containers) is always the solution!

                  We try to design things small and scale upward in a distributed fashion as demand increases. If a pair of servers can't cope we spin another up and add it to the load balancer. We've got load balancers, message queues, and distributed databases in every nook and cranny.

                  Ya I build everything on minimal and add as needed. A few machines are running on 512MB.

                  Pretty sure our devs don't need 48 GB to run an oracle web server.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ObsolesceO
                    Obsolesce @bbigford
                    last edited by

                    @BBigford said in What Linux Are You Running:

                    @scottalanmiller said in What Linux Are You Running:

                    Somestimes I think about moving to Fedora more than CentOS due to how we work.

                    100% CentOS, about 95% of those are on 6. Just out of curiosity, what kind of workload for Fedora? I've honestly never understood it as a server.

                    Yeah I'm curious too. What are the benefits of Fedora as a server over CentOS?

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      CentOS is based on Fedora. But one is about long term support and one is about currency. If Fedora seems weird to you, so would Ubuntu as they both match a six month cycle. Fedora just has the long term support option of CentOS that Ubuntu lacks (they have the name, but not the product.)

                      The advantage to Fedora or Ubuntu is in currency. Packages are updated every six months, everything from Node to the kernel. So you get new features much earlier. For example PHP7 is standard on Fedora for some time, but nowhere close for CentOS. If you are running modern web apps, like NextCloud, there are some pretty huge benefits from not getting outdated.

                      Updating every six months instead of every several years (about three or four) means that updates are typically small and incremental rather than large and cumbersome. Updating becomes a normal process and newer security features are available too, just like new stability features. Suse takes this even farther with rolling updates.

                      The idea behind LTS releases like CentOS is that you can stagnate on a platform and ignore it for a long time. This, of course, has value. But we aren't a stagnant company. We have active support and want the latest features and latest software. We aren't looking for vendors to blame, so long term lock ins to known platforms lacks the value that it might have in a slower moving company.

                      bbigfordB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • bbigfordB
                        bbigford @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said in What Linux Are You Running:

                        CentOS is based on Fedora. But one is about long term support and one is about currency. If Fedora seems weird to you, so would Ubuntu as they both match a six month cycle. Fedora just has the long term support option of CentOS that Ubuntu lacks (they have the name, but not the product.)

                        The advantage to Fedora or Ubuntu is in currency. Packages are updated every six months, everything from Node to the kernel. So you get new features much earlier. For example PHP7 is standard on Fedora for some time, but nowhere close for CentOS. If you are running modern web apps, like NextCloud, there are some pretty huge benefits from not getting outdated.

                        Updating every six months instead of every several years (about three or four) means that updates are typically small and incremental rather than large and cumbersome. Updating becomes a normal process and newer security features are available too, just like new stability features. Suse takes this even farther with rolling updates.

                        The idea behind LTS releases like CentOS is that you can stagnate on a platform and ignore it for a long time. This, of course, has value. But we aren't a stagnant company. We have active support and want the latest features and latest software. We aren't looking for vendors to blame, so long term lock ins to known platforms lacks the value that it might have in a slower moving company.

                        Yeah, that makes sense.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                        • 2
                        • 3
                        • 3 / 3
                        • First post
                          Last post