What constitutes an IT Pro?
-
@art_of_shred said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
Well by definition your are a professional if you are paid to do a certain task. IT professional is no different than professional wrestler.
Your paid to do X. Which means your a professional
No difference between a pro wrestler and an IT pro? Hmmm...
I performed my signature move the "Tombstone" on that 2003 Exchange server. It's completely out of commission.
-
@art_of_shred well besides what you "do"
-
@wirestyle22 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@art_of_shred said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
Well by definition your are a professional if you are paid to do a certain task. IT professional is no different than professional wrestler.
Your paid to do X. Which means your a professional
No difference between a pro wrestler and an IT pro? Hmmm...
I performed my signature move the "Tombstone" on that 2003 Exchange server. It's completely out of commission.
I gave an open cabinet door the Sweet Chin Music the last time I visited the DC.
-
@ChrisL said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@wirestyle22 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@art_of_shred said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
Well by definition your are a professional if you are paid to do a certain task. IT professional is no different than professional wrestler.
Your paid to do X. Which means your a professional
No difference between a pro wrestler and an IT pro? Hmmm...
I performed my signature move the "Tombstone" on that 2003 Exchange server. It's completely out of commission.
I gave an open cabinet door the Sweet Chin Music the last time I visited the DC.
Good grief what am I doing wrong. I never physically abuse the equipment, it typically abuses me!!
Matt directs laser eyeballs at the rack hardware that has sliced him up on multiple occasions
-
@MattSpeller said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@ChrisL said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@wirestyle22 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@art_of_shred said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
Well by definition your are a professional if you are paid to do a certain task. IT professional is no different than professional wrestler.
Your paid to do X. Which means your a professional
No difference between a pro wrestler and an IT pro? Hmmm...
I performed my signature move the "Tombstone" on that 2003 Exchange server. It's completely out of commission.
I gave an open cabinet door the Sweet Chin Music the last time I visited the DC.
Good grief what am I doing wrong. I never physically abuse the equipment, it typically abuses me!!
Matt directs laser eyeballs at the rack hardware that has sliced him up on multiple occasions
Just as long as you're not trash-talking to it before it kicks your a$$. That would be embarrassing.
-
I'm jumping in pretty late, but I think that a big thing that we have to consider is if "pro" applies to IT. IT is nothing like doctors, lawyers and not much like traditional engineers. I hate the term pro as it brings connotations of fields with which IT really does not have anything in common. I like the term practitioner better. IT is a business field and business isn't a field of professionals. Business is about "who can do it the best." Professionals are traditionally all about certifications and regulations - following rules and being locked "inside the box."
-
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
Well by definition your are a professional if you are paid to do a certain task. IT professional is no different than professional wrestler.
Your paid to do X. Which means your a professional
That doesn't match US employment rules as to professional versus non-professional. There is the loose "paid" definition but there are much more strict definitions that make only a handful of jobs listed as professional - and none that IT would happily identify with.
-
@RojoLoco said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
I thought the definition of "IT Pro" was: "anyone and everyone who manages to figure out how to make a spiceworks account". Or is that just SW's definition?
Anyone and everyone for whom an account is made. You adding way too much constriction.
-
-
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
Yup, and the major definition is part 1, not part 2. That was my point. And if you use part 2, then you lump IT in with ALL work, like garbage men or janitors. And in one case you can call yourself "a professional" and in the other you cannot. Just because you flip burgers at McD's does not mean that you can say that you are a "professional."
-
US Legal Definition of Professional:
-
@scottalanmiller the definition is based on by all descriptions of it, as something done to earn income. In a general summary.
The only thing that allows variance is the 1b which describes a professional as a learned profession. Like a personal accountant, or lawyer.
But in any case it boils down to, what you're paid to do for work.
-
Because IT does not yet have a specially organized body of knowledge, IT isn't eligible for professional status. In many ways, it's higher than a professional status because it requires a degree of knowledge that cannot yet be codified.
-
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@scottalanmiller the definition is based on by all descriptions of it, as something done to earn income. In a general summary.
The only thing that allows variance is the 1b which describes a professional as a learned profession. Like a personal accountant, or lawyer.
But in any case it boils down to, what you're paid to do for work.
That's neither what the primarily (part 1) definition says, not how the word is most commonly used and not how it is used legally in the US. Professional can be used in the silly way of "I'm a professional burger flipper" but a burger flipper cannot say "I'm a professional." That would be outright lying.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
Because IT does not yet have a specially organized body of knowledge, IT isn't eligible for professional status. In many ways, it's higher than a professional status because it requires a degree of knowledge that cannot yet be codified.
Wrong. IT is codified as being intellectual and varied in character.
-
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@scottalanmiller said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
Because IT does not yet have a specially organized body of knowledge, IT isn't eligible for professional status. In many ways, it's higher than a professional status because it requires a degree of knowledge that cannot yet be codified.
Wrong. IT is codified as being intellectual and varied in character.
That is not what the term codified means at all. IT is not codified, plain and simple. There is no standard corpus of knowledge. None whatsoever.
-
@scottalanmiller said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@scottalanmiller the definition is based on by all descriptions of it, as something done to earn income. In a general summary.
The only thing that allows variance is the 1b which describes a professional as a learned profession. Like a personal accountant, or lawyer.
But in any case it boils down to, what you're paid to do for work.
That's neither what the primarily (part 1) definition says, not how the word is most commonly used and not how it is used legally in the US. Professional can be used in the silly way of "I'm a professional burger flipper" but a burger flipper cannot say "I'm a professional." That would be outright lying.
But the basic definition of professional is "what you get paid to do as your primary work". So if 60% of the time you're flipping burgers, you are a professional burger flipper.
-
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@scottalanmiller said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@DustinB3403 said in What constitutes an IT Pro?:
@scottalanmiller the definition is based on by all descriptions of it, as something done to earn income. In a general summary.
The only thing that allows variance is the 1b which describes a professional as a learned profession. Like a personal accountant, or lawyer.
But in any case it boils down to, what you're paid to do for work.
That's neither what the primarily (part 1) definition says, not how the word is most commonly used and not how it is used legally in the US. Professional can be used in the silly way of "I'm a professional burger flipper" but a burger flipper cannot say "I'm a professional." That would be outright lying.
But the basic definition of professional is "what you get paid to do as your primary work". So if 60% of the time you're flipping burgers, you are a professional burger flipper.
Correct, I already agreed to that. But under no terms can you also claim to be "a professional." Burger flippers, like IT, do not meet the list of necessary qualifications to be "a professional."
-
We've covered this, there is a meaningful use of the term "professional" like doctor or lawyer, and a silly, pointless one meaning "anytime you get paid." There is no purpose to talking about or discussing the latter here. Your point is made that that is a valid English use of the word, but that discussion is over and we are talking about the real job description here.
-
@scottalanmiller I disagree.
Many people would agree anyone who works in a field with experience is then a professional. And to be a "pro" at something requires 2000 hours of experience (recalling from memory).
So anyone who works at a job doing their primary tasks for 2000 is a Pro, and therefore a professional!
