Simplivity - anyone use them?
-
@scottalanmiller I cannot help but feel a bit like I'm being attacked. {salesdick?}
I will assure you the conversation will be moved to our leadership around pricing disclosure to end users. Was here being friendly, I think I'm better off to leave this to the bloggers/marketing folks, but I feel responsible as I should have done the event. Sorry all. Didn't mean to stir up the hornets.
-
@virtualrick said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
@scottalanmiller I cannot help but feel a bit like I'm being attacked. {salesdick?}
I will assure you the conversation will be moved to our leadership around pricing disclosure to end users. Was here being friendly, I think I'm better off to leave this to the bloggers/marketing folks, but I feel responsible as I should have done the event. Sorry all. Didn't mean to stir up the hornets.
Don't take it as being attacked, take it as getting informed. This is an enormous issue in the SMB space, which is why it is discussed so often and why it is made so public and why SMB IT expects all vendors to take the time to understand this before engaging the market. But this is how you learn.
Keep in mind that had you guys not come into the community, the only interaction with Simplivity would have been the Chicago meeting and lots and lots of people upset about how they were treated there. You are coming in from a position of having kind of offended a lot of people at that Chicago meeting. So of course, it feels a little like an uphill battle. That meeting went so poorly that scores of companies took you off the "to consider or even talk to" list, including companies that you had no idea your message had reached.
So turning that around is important. In this thread, you guys have done pretty well. But there is still a defense of the private pricing tactics, that means that your team doesn't understand the issue. They might provide the pricing now, and that's great. But we are trying to help you guys understand what kind of message you have been sending and why it's not just necessary to give pricing when we press for it, but why it needs to be public. Clearly your team understands and wants to help get us the info that we need, but we are trying to help you not need to have conversations like this in the future to get that info to other people.
Does that make sense? We are not just trying to help you fix one misstep in Chicago, but to help Simplivity fix what to us is a totally snub of the SMB market. That you found out about it because one community made it public enough for you to notice means that 99% of people are disregarding your company and product without providing you the deep feedback as to why.
-
@scottalanmiller Understood. FWIW, my sales rep and I have sold to over 60 SMBs and I can tell you there are times when they negotiate better pricing than the enterprise. I have saved a few spice heads some large amounts that they are happy to discuss. Look at Shane Ladd on spice works. He calls me out by name. We don't want to lose partnerships due to cost so we have been very aggressive in assuring that we work with you guys to get to a solution that works. we work hard to help people, not just get something on the floor. It is unfortunate that because of many sales reps shady practices we have to be so guarded, but I get it.
-
@virtualrick something to consider for perspective... this isn't the community that had the meeting in Chicago, that the feedback from Chicago spilled into this community shows how big the ramifications from something as simple as holding back pricing can be. That you found out that people were looking for that information in this community is an artifact of the fact that the conversations here are always public, so you know about them. In other communities, and specifically the one that had the Chicago meeting, a very large percentage of their conversations are totally private and you, as a vendor, cannot see that they even exist let alone see what is said. So these same kinds of conversations could easily be going on where you cannot see them and cannot jump in to provide more insight or pricing.
Consider how many customers or potential customers have these conversations in smaller communities, private communities or over a beer where you can't jump in and "fix" things.
We're just trying to provide some market education here, so that you are better prepared to know what to expect, but also so that we can get better interactions. We want our vendors (we being the SMB market) to understand us and our needs. The SMB is very hard to understand for vendors because you deal with little pinpoints rather than large chunks.
-
@scottalanmiller In that case thank you. We do not want to snub SMB, we value your business. I think you'll find that our data protection is great in that space where dr is a major undertaking and often too expensive, and sys admins have to constantly compete with IaaS offerings. Hopefully, you have the time to give us a look at some point, and I will relay th edata to management, However there may be drivers around publishing a pricebook in a competitive space that we are both unaware of.
-
@virtualrick said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
@scottalanmiller Understood. FWIW, my sales rep and I have sold to over 60 SMBs and I can tell you there are times when they negotiate better pricing than the enterprise.
Oh someone can. But I can't. I'm a sucky negotiator. I mean, really awful. I have one tactic that I use every time, I ask for the price. If that price isn't awesome, I never call back. That's it. It's not a trick, I just don't negotiate. I do the same thing in Middle Eastern bazaars. I know it isn't how they do things, but I can't stand the negotiations. If the product isn't the price that I want, the need to negotiate alone is enough to walk away (or hand over to someone skilled at that.)
IT traditionally is very bad at that skill, if you have a purchasing department, then it can work out for you. At least half of us dont have those, though (okay, I do, but I'm one of the lucky ones.)
-
@virtualrick said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
It is unfortunate that because of many sales reps shady practices we have to be so guarded, but I get it.
While that's a factor, I don't think that it's the big one. At least not from my perspective. It's that I need lots of info, all the time, when making decisions and knowing prices and knowing them more or less reliably is critical in being able to compare options. I do option compares all day, every day. Knowing how close different solutions are to one another has to be a ten second thing, it has to be in my head, if I have to ask someone for that info, it's too "costly" in time and effort to make it into a matrix. Most SMB systems design is done "live" without time to request pricing. No matter how great the pricing is or how awesome the sales guy is, it's a workflow concern.
-
@virtualrick said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
@scottalanmiller I cannot help but feel a bit like I'm being attacked. {salesdick?}
That particular line was from @RojoLoco who is not known for mincing words in general. @scottalanmiller also has a tendency to break up his responses into multiple posts. It adds some clarity, but can be overwhelming, and he is also very blunt (although his language is less...colorful in online postings compared to Rojo). It can be a hard pill to swallow, but if you sift the wheat from the chaff you will find some very significant competitive advantages for the SMB market. I fall into the same category as most here. If a vendor doesn't post basic pricing information I will typically walk away unless there is a significant motivator aside from the product itself (peer recommendation being the largest).
-
@scottalanmiller This is great feedback. you are right I cant fix it, but again I feel personally responsible.
-
@virtualrick said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
@scottalanmiller This is great feedback. you are right I cant fix it, but again I feel personally responsible.
That's what I'm hoping for. It's not hounding or attacking, it's clarifying. It's not a simple "hey we want prices, give them to us" issue. It's that SMBs often have complicated differences that if you don't work with hundreds of SMBs personally from the inside you might have no idea are common. So we are trying to get that stuff exposed for you. The feedback to management at Simplivity shouldn't be "people get pissy without pricing", although that's a good elevator pitch for the meeting, but should end in a presentation of "did you guys know that SMB workflows often don't allow for price negotiation or discovery... and here is why!"
-
@Kelly Thanks Kelly, great insight, and for the record, when I'm asked for numbers I do give them, and will try to influence my peers to do the same.
-
@scottalanmiller Thanks for that Scott, will do.
-
As someone who works with Vendors and teaches them how to communicate with IT Pro's... IT Pro's may all be very blunt (ok darn right harsh) they are right.
We IT Pro's (yes I am an IT Pro just have a different job title these days), will not take a second look at a vendor that hides their pricing.
We also don't like to work with Sales people we don't know. So get to know us socially not just talking about your product on a forum.
We want honesty (ok not just us), we want transparency and we don't want someone to tell us what we need.We don't have a ton of time so not having your pricing easy to find = not worth finding out.
How can we trust a sales person if they well aren't a person to us. Online posting does take a bit to get used to being social, talk to us, joke with us tell us what you had for lunch today (seriously).
We already know what we need so don't tell us that part unless we ask you to. -
@Minion-Queen Thanks and I agree with every point. Not eating lunch today as I am short on time too I take things a bit personally I'll admit, so your comments are taken to heart. I'm not a person who frequents the forums, so I'm not the greatest at knowing the proper format.
Honestly speaking, I felt I could jump in and turn it around, without really thinking it through. My ego got in the way of my hearing for a bit, as indeed I am just another person. Thanks all.
-
@virtualrick said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
@Minion-Queen Thanks and I agree with every point. Not eating lunch today as I am short on time too I take things a bit personally I'll admit, so your comments are taken to heart. I'm not a person who frequents the forums, so I'm not the greatest at knowing the proper format.
Honestly speaking, I felt I could jump in and turn it around, without really thinking it through. My ego got in the way of my hearing for a bit, as indeed I am just another person. Thanks all.
If you want any guidance at all I am here to help direct you! Always happy to help someone get the most out of ML.
-
@Kelly said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
@virtualrick said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
@scottalanmiller I cannot help but feel a bit like I'm being attacked. {salesdick?}
That particular line was from @RojoLoco who is not known for mincing words in general.
^^^Truth. I refuse to mince words because I mean what I say, online or otherwise. @virtualrick, I'm not attacking you personally, I refer to every salesperson as a "sales dick". I have no use for "sales" staff in my research endeavours, and I refuse to let my decisions be swayed by them. I only posted because I, along with many others here in this community, would like to help you learn how to sell to actual IT pros, not directors/C-levels/etc. We are the ones who implement and use any given technology, and we have a certain approach and a certain set of criteria we look at when researching new technologies. Even the best product/service/technology is ruined by bad sales techniques, and we love it when vendors hear and understand that. If someone wants pricing, provide it without argument or further harassment from your sales staff. We thrive on specs and pricing, because that allows us to make our own comparisons. Save the Gartner magic bullshit and buzzwords for someone else.
-
@virtualrick said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
Honestly speaking, I felt I could jump in and turn it around, without really thinking it through. My ego got in the way of my hearing for a bit, as indeed I am just another person. Thanks all.
In my eyes, although I'm not in a position of any real purchasing power, you and the other poster (sorry, I forget your name!) have done a very good job. Not simply because you gave your pricing, but because you have chosen to interact with us and not run off because you felt like you were being attacked.
Many of us realize that things at Simplivity may not change overnight, but if your upper management is serious about moving into the SMB space, they'll take the information that you give them to heart.
-
@dafyre Thanks, I am not in a position to change that, however the issue is raised. I will assure you I will not dodge the question when presenting to anyone.
-
@virtualrick said in Simplivity - anyone use them?:
but keep in mind I gave pricing in my first interaction with you.
I noticed and I am extremely happy for that. It tells me that your product is not going into any of my clients currently looking towards new servers.
It also told me about the level of local server needs will justify your equipment.
I was very interested in the product as presented. I still am interested in the product after getting a ballpark range.
But I also know my client base and none of them have needs in that range currently.
-
@JaredBusch Understood. When you compare to just the Hosts or servers, the TCO would be poor, however the cost of servers, storage, backup software, backup target, are usually higher as a whole. Throw in DR if its considered necessary, and the cost is usually 200% the cost of Simplivity.
We can replace all of that, and typically we reduce the sockets in the environment. In fact we support essentials plus for a 2+1 meaning 2 in an HA pair at prod and a single node at DR.
My partner and I have had some disscussions around the thread, and we are going to try to config an SMB bundle with a real street cost, it will be heavily discounted (like enterprises get) without the haggle.
If it meets the price point then great. If not then perhaps we aren't a good fit today.