ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes

    IT Discussion
    xenserver 7.0 storage repository
    4
    28
    3.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • momurdaM
      momurda
      last edited by

      what does 'pvdisplay' output?
      or 'vgdisplay'

      xe sr-create host-uuid=uuidofhost shared=false type=lvm content-type=user device-config:device=/dev/sda1 name-label="blah"

      KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • KellyK
        Kelly @travisdh1
        last edited by

        @travisdh1 said in XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes:

        @Kelly Ok, so sdb is obviously the system drive. Is the RAID controller a Dell/LSI? Might need to get the LSI megaraid-sas or one of their other utilities installed to get us the actual array status. For now, what does

        fdisk -l /dev/sda
        

        show?

        Disk /dev/sda: 24001.4 GB, 24001350991872 bytes, 46877638656 sectors
        Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
        Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
        I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
        
        travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • KellyK
          Kelly @momurda
          last edited by

          @momurda said in XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes:

          what does 'pvdisplay' output?
          or 'vgdisplay'

          xe sr-create host-uuid=uuidofhost shared=false type=lvm content-type=user device-config:device=/dev/sda1 name-label="blah"

          No return on either pvdisplay or vgdisplay.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • travisdh1T
            travisdh1 @Kelly
            last edited by

            @Kelly So far the drive looks good. This seems silly, be it could be that you'll need to create a partition on the drive for things to work. (Don't ask me why, a raw drive vs a partition shouldn't make much difference.) I'd go with an LVM partition type and use type=lvm like @momurda suggested.

            KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • KellyK
              Kelly @travisdh1
              last edited by

              @travisdh1 said in XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes:

              @Kelly So far the drive looks good. This seems silly, be it could be that you'll need to create a partition on the drive for things to work. (Don't ask me why, a raw drive vs a partition shouldn't make much difference.) I'd go with an LVM partition type and use type=lvm like @momurda suggested.

              Same response. I just have a > below the command.

              travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • travisdh1T
                travisdh1 @Kelly
                last edited by

                @Kelly Well, bother.

                xe sr-create host-uuid=uuidofhost shared=false type=lvm content-type=user device-config:device=/dev/sda1 name-label="blah"
                

                Should work. You've stumped me for the day at least.

                KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • momurdaM
                  momurda
                  last edited by

                  Thats weird. pvdisplay/vgdisplay should give you a list of physical devices (pvdisplay) and vgdisplay should show you the logical volumes of your physical disks.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • KellyK
                    Kelly @travisdh1
                    last edited by

                    @travisdh1 said in XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes:

                    @Kelly Well, bother.

                    xe sr-create host-uuid=uuidofhost shared=false type=lvm content-type=user device-config:device=/dev/sda1 name-label="blah"
                    

                    Should work. You've stumped me for the day at least.

                    Does the order of the elements after sr-create matter?

                    travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • travisdh1T
                      travisdh1 @Kelly
                      last edited by

                      @Kelly said in XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes:

                      @travisdh1 said in XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes:

                      @Kelly Well, bother.

                      xe sr-create host-uuid=uuidofhost shared=false type=lvm content-type=user device-config:device=/dev/sda1 name-label="blah"
                      

                      Should work. You've stumped me for the day at least.

                      Does the order of the elements after sr-create matter?

                      It shouldn't, but xe can be a bit of an oddball at times. Could be as simple as a space where one shouldn't be.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • KellyK
                        Kelly
                        last edited by

                        Ok, so I decided to step through xe sr-create until it stopped complaining. It created the SR with just this:

                        xe sr-create name-label="VM Storage" type=lvm host-uuid=uuid device-config:device=/dev/sda
                        

                        I only entered a parameter when it specifically asked for it. I'm wondering if there is an undocumented change in one of the parameters.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • KellyK
                          Kelly
                          last edited by

                          And the same command worked on the second host in the pool as well (different uuid).

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • momurdaM
                            momurda
                            last edited by

                            curious what the output of 'xe sr-list' shows for content-type on your new SRs since you didnt specify when creating.

                            KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • KellyK
                              Kelly @momurda
                              last edited by

                              @momurda said in XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes:

                              curious what the output of 'xe sr-list' shows for content-type on your new SRs since you didnt specify when creating.

                              Hmm...

                              content-type ( RO):
                              
                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • momurdaM
                                momurda
                                last edited by

                                Hmm indeed. can you use the new SRs? Boot a vm on them, add a disk from one to an existing vm?

                                KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • KellyK
                                  Kelly @momurda
                                  last edited by

                                  @momurda said in XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes:

                                  Hmm indeed. can you use the new SRs? Boot a vm on them, add a disk from one to an existing vm?

                                  The pbd was marked as read-only. I'm going to try adding in content-type to my above command.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • momurdaM
                                    momurda
                                    last edited by

                                    I am not clear about this, but i think the results of xe sr-list
                                    0_1465596516689_upload-29cacbab-e373-4f34-945e-86e9e38f0396
                                    the RO/RW parts refer to the parameters themselves, not necessarily the SR.
                                    For instance, you cant change uuid of an sr so it is RO.
                                    You can change the name-label, name-description parameters, so they are RW

                                    KellyK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • KellyK
                                      Kelly @momurda
                                      last edited by

                                      @momurda said in XenServer Local SR: Need another pair of eyes:

                                      I am not clear about this, but i think the results of xe sr-list
                                      0_1465596516689_upload-29cacbab-e373-4f34-945e-86e9e38f0396
                                      the RO/RW parts refer to the parameters themselves, not necessarily the SR.
                                      For instance, you cant change uuid of an sr so it is RO.
                                      You can change the name-label, name-description parameters, so they are RW

                                      Hmm, perhaps it wasn't read only, but I couldn't install to it. I removed the SR and PBD and then redid it with the content-type defined and I'm now able to install to it.

                                      Final command:

                                      xe sr-create name-label="VM Storage" type=lvm content-type=user host-uuid=uuid device-config:device=/dev/sda
                                      
                                      travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • momurdaM
                                        momurda
                                        last edited by

                                        Nice. Also Ive only been using XS for a few months, so i could be wrong about the xe sr-list command output

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • travisdh1T
                                          travisdh1 @Kelly
                                          last edited by

                                          @Kelly It doesn't help that most of us have to use the xe sr-create command once every 4-5 years.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 1 / 2
                                          • First post
                                            Last post