Would you rather... Looking for clever questions
-
huh - wouldn't the answer for an MSP be always be to the the one you can bill get the problem?
-
I think in would you rather "yourself or a client" it is always the client. Let's be realistic - we never want a problem to be our fault or even our problem. Plus clients pay for service, that earns money when they've been careless or unfortunate. Not that we want it to happen, but we certainly never want it to be our fault!
-
@Dashrender said:
huh - wouldn't the answer for an MSP be always be to the the one you can bill get the problem?
That's what I was thinking. Our job at an MSP is often to solve customer disasters. It's not that we want them to have disasters, any more than the fire department doesn't want peoples' houses to burn, but our job is to handle that stuff routinely.
-
Solid reliable system or 100% Working Backups
-
@MattSpeller said:
Solid reliable system or 100% Working Backups
I don't think that there is much of a question there. Would you like a great seatbelt or to never need one?
-
@MattSpeller said:
Solid reliable system or 100% Working Backups
100% Working Backups... Solid reliable systems can fail.
-
@dafyre said:
@MattSpeller said:
Solid reliable system or 100% Working Backups
100% Working Backups... Solid reliable systems can fail.
I'd go the other way and create backups of the working system but I grok where you're coming from
-
@MattSpeller said:
@dafyre said:
@MattSpeller said:
Solid reliable system or 100% Working Backups
100% Working Backups... Solid reliable systems can fail.
I'd go the other way and create backups of the working system but I grok where you're coming from
Better to avoid a fence on top of a cliff than a hospital beneath it
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@MattSpeller said:
Solid reliable system or 100% Working Backups
I don't think that there is much of a question there. Would you like a great seatbelt or to never need one?
I'm not sure that's a good comparison.
A solid reliable system does not imply it will never fail, but to never need a seatbelt means I can clearly go without it.
-
I'm pretty sure the point of the question was that it was completely reliable since the alternative was completely reliable. If it wasn't then again, no question, one was totally reliable with the backups.
Honestly, impossible questions are pointless. Nothing is perfectly reliable, so there is no point.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
I'm pretty sure the point of the question was that it was completely reliable since the alternative was completely reliable. If it wasn't then again, no question, one was totally reliable with the backups.
Honestly, impossible questions are pointless. Nothing is perfectly reliable, so there is no point.
Exactly, so sort of some funniness, I'm not really sure why I would read about two fictional non-nonsensical situations.
-
Would you rather all of your IT staff be rabbits or all of management be frogs.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Would you rather all of your IT staff be rabbits or all of management be frogs.
Manglement can ribbet. Zero hesitation.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Would you rather all of your IT staff be rabbits or all of management be frogs.
I have no idea what this mean?
-
@coliver said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Would you rather all of your IT staff be rabbits or all of management be frogs.
I have no idea what this mean?
Once we are asking fanciful, impossible questions... what is the point? We might as well talk about fairies and talking animals taking over jobs.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Would you rather all of your IT staff be rabbits or all of management be frogs.
I have no idea what this mean?
Once we are asking fanciful, impossible questions... what is the point? We might as well talk about fairies and talking animals taking over jobs.
Well, Youtube does have the armies of code monkeys.
