ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    What Wiki or other webserver to use for intranet site?

    IT Discussion
    mediawiki wiki sharepoint intranet
    8
    19
    3.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      MediaWiki is the defacto choice here. Never had a speed issue. It's fast and easy to manage. If MySQL is a concern the pmWiki is good and only uses the file system.

      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        MediaWiki is the defacto choice here. Never had a speed issue. It's fast and easy to manage. If MySQL is a concern the pmWiki is good and only uses the file system.

        Cool I'll probably stick with it for now.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said:

          @scottalanmiller said:

          MediaWiki is the defacto choice here. Never had a speed issue. It's fast and easy to manage. If MySQL is a concern the pmWiki is good and only uses the file system.

          Cool I'll probably stick with it for now.

          I would.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Bill KindleB
            Bill Kindle
            last edited by

            I tried to setup Sharpoint Foundations 2013 and then I found out it doesn't work with 2012 R2. I had a sad.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • NetworkNerdN
              NetworkNerd
              last edited by

              You could do Sharepoint Foundation 2013, but that may be overkill in terms of what you want to do and managing it moving forward. I don't think I would use it just for a wiki.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                So now more than a year later, what did you end up doing? You still running MediaWiki?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • stacksofplatesS
                  stacksofplates
                  last edited by stacksofplates

                  Drupal. I built a section where we can track issues with certain products we make, a section for maintenance logs, a section for safety violations and accidents, a section for QC, and some misc stuff like a visitors section where people sign in but just fill out the form and sign with their finger instead of using a paper log. It also has company documents and forms that can be printed off if needed.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    I had a Mediawiki for about 6 months, but the formatting on wikis is just horrible. It's also aesthetically displeasing.

                    I need to look into other options, but it hasn't been a priority.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      Jason Banned
                      last edited by

                      We have a couple of sharepoint sites, It really doesn't get a ton of use though.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said:

                        I had a Mediawiki for about 6 months, but the formatting on wikis is just horrible. It's also aesthetically displeasing.

                        I need to look into other options, but it hasn't been a priority.

                        The problem is, easy to edit and aesthetically pleasing rarely go together. There really aren't good tools for making something that is easy for quick documentation that then looks really nice too. Great formatting takes effort.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller @Jason
                          last edited by

                          @Jason said:

                          We have a couple of sharepoint sites, It really doesn't get a ton of use though.

                          I feel that we get far less use when it looks nice because it is then harder to use. It's the easier, uglier tools that seem to get the love the most.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post