@pattonb to get an idea of how many dupes use the following
fdupes -r -m /directory(share to scan)
@pattonb to get an idea of how many dupes use the following
fdupes -r -m /directory(share to scan)
@DustinB3403 some folks claim jdupes is faster, I have used both, and did not much of a difference.
Both work well.
Is it just me or am I seeing less compliance in the setup of postmaster@fqdn
it does help, any solutions for samba file servers, and WSD ?
is it prudent to use cidr notation for an include record in a SPF record, or is a fqdn acceptable ? or both ?
@JaredBusch incorrect, Scott has summarized succinctly
@JaredBusch correct, they are tools to determine validity of incoming email. If you have a mail server , ( I would think with a static ip), why you wouldn't have a ptr record that matches your mailserver, is asking for issues.
@JaredBusch SPF has it flaws, however, in this case , ptr check yields 2 fqdn, and no listing in the SPF to confirm validity of sender.
@JaredBusch true, and your point is ?
@scottalanmiller ok, thanks, I am sure it isn't a spammer, it is an email, for me, I was expecting. The sender 'city of calgary"
has their ptr record setup that way.
@pattonb argh the ip IS NOT listed in their spf record, can't type today
@scottalanmiller I have read it. the question is/was, how do you deal with this situation when it occurs (rarely), is there a way other than whitelisting the offending ip for the ptr. and the ip is listed in their spf list.
@JaredBusch the question is more about a ptr record
@dbeato it has been my experience that, dns checks eliminates loads of spam
I thought there was an rfc that stipulates, 1 fqdn with 1 ip per ptr record.
I should clarify, the ptr record single ip) has 2 fqdn, how does zimbra ( or any mailserver), know which fqdn
to verify, My understanding it attempts to verify the 'greeting' sever by doing a ptr lookup, and if it doesn't match, then
the attempted connection is rejected, as there is a mismatch with the sending server, and the ptr record.
Running a Zimbra server, and came across this today. 2 fqdn and 1 ip (ptr lookup).
Is there a simple way of avoiding the rejection of the email ?
ip in questions is 198.160.191.6 ( sending server)
and the pandemonium..is the sending server.
What are folks using to recover a deleted/corrupted partition these days.
I haven't had to do this in a number of years, at that time 'test disk' was my go to utility.
@dbeato looks like I need version 8.8.9 (or newer) in order to use the 2.0 Oauth to sync google calendar.
thanks everybody