That means having to re-enter those connections every time you have a new device?
If you only have a few hosts, no big deal.
If you have like 50, that's a real PITA
Posts made by FATeknollogee
-
RE: Virt-Manager on multiple pc's
-
Virt-Manager on multiple pc's
Do you have https://virt-manager.org/ on multiple pc's?
How did you "export" the configs?
How do you keep them in sync? -
RE: KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management
@DustinB3403 said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
@FATeknollogee said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
@DustinB3403 said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
@matteo-nunziati said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
@EddieJennings said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
@black3dynamite said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
oVirt web management UI looks very similar to what RHEV uses.
I'm surprised Red Hat doesn't seem to be promoting whatever they use for managing RHEV. I figured they'd try to lure folks away from VMware or Hyper-V with a slick interface
Ovirt is the upstream of RHEV.
So you'd install 1-300 oVirt nodes (on your physical and individual servers) and create a gluster pool out of them?
I actually looked at this a while ago and got frustrated with their documentation because and very specifically it jumps across all of the options to getting ovirt to work.
Ah no, that's not how oVirt works.
Can you explain then?
Ovirt has their own iso. So presumably you'd install that on your hardware as a node over and over.
If you're talking Gluster, that usually refers to a "hyperconverged" install with HE (Hosted Engine).
Recommended start point "out of Box" is 3 nodes per cluster using Cockpit UI for the setup.
This'll give you some idea: https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2018/02/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4-2-and-gluster-storage.html -
RE: KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management
@black3dynamite said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
oVirt web management UI looks very similar to what RHEV uses.
Guess why...they're pretty much one & the same, kinda like CentOS/RHEL/Fedora.
-
RE: KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management
@DustinB3403 said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
@matteo-nunziati said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
@EddieJennings said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
@black3dynamite said in KVM / Red Hat Virtualization Management:
oVirt web management UI looks very similar to what RHEV uses.
I'm surprised Red Hat doesn't seem to be promoting whatever they use for managing RHEV. I figured they'd try to lure folks away from VMware or Hyper-V with a slick interface
Ovirt is the upstream of RHEV.
So you'd install 1-300 oVirt nodes (on your physical and individual servers) and create a gluster pool out of them?
I actually looked at this a while ago and got frustrated with their documentation because and very specifically it jumps across all of the options to getting ovirt to work.
Ah no, that's not how oVirt works.
-
RE: Buying a New Car
Take the car to Carmax for an appraisal.
Book an appointment online, aren't you in Ventura? There's a CarMax in Oxnard.
If you like their offer, they'll cut you a check on the spot. -
RE: Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect
Auto-update is taking care of biz...
0.2.8-p -
RE: Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect
Auto-update is now working.
I'm now on 0.2.8-n -
RE: Testing oVirt...
@FATeknollogee said in Testing oVirt...:
Also waiting for this beta to drop: https://www.trilio.io/triliovault/
Update: The Trilio saga....:face_with_open_mouth_cold_sweat:
I followed up with Trilio.
A lot of promises/dates were made (by Trilio) as to when a beta would be made available for testing.
Needless to say, they never came through.
Finally in Dec 2018, they said we are ready for the demo, we will show you a working product.
The day came, Trilio said, sorry it's too close to Xmas, we will postpone the demo's till 2019.
In 2019, I continued to follow up & finally they set a date for another demo - Jan 29.
On Jan. 29, we get on the Webex, they said, sorry the demo just broke 10 mins prior to our call, so no demo.
They show me some screenshots & their OpenStack version & again promise to get me beta software in a few days.
I continue to follow up (via email)Yesterday (Feb 6), I get an email from Thomas Lahive GM; Sales and Alliance Partners....(copied & pasted below):
"We started RHV betas and decided to prioritize current Trilio customers (those that purchased Triliovault for Openstack).Â
If you would like to be part of the beta now then We can sign you up as a certified Trilio reseller which has a $7,500 Starter Fee. The $7,500 will be credited against your first customer order that is at least $7,500 so it will eventually cost you nothing. Many of our partners can apply the fee against revenue so it's a great tax incentive, but you can confirm with your finance department. Â
Please Lmk how you would like to proceed."Please remember, I have never seen a working demo of this product, never.
Is this typical behavior of RH partners?
-
RE: Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect
@Ylian How is auto-update supposed to work? I have to update manually.
-
RE: Comparing MeshCentral 2 to ScreenConnect
For 2FA, I use Authy.
Agree w @pmoncho easy, peazy setup! -
RE: New PBX - on prem or off?
@scottalanmiller said in New PBX - on prem or off?:
@Dashrender said in New PBX - on prem or off?:
You might consider your PBX to be super HA requirements - but clearly most SMBs don't because they don't install them that way..
As you know, what SMBs "consider" is irrelevant. Dogs like to eat chocolate. Doesn't make giving it to them smart.
I'm going to have to steal that dogs eating choc line, ROFL!!
-
RE: New PBX - on prem or off?
@Dashrender said in New PBX - on prem or off?:
@FATeknollogee said in New PBX - on prem or off?:
You've said nothing regarding your on-prem vm capacity/capability?
Also, how is your LAN equipment - good, new, old, POE switches etc?What baring does that have on my question though? How would that affect Onsite or Hosted PBX?
Obviously, if you don't have the ability or capability to "create" vm's...that would kill the on-prem option!
-
RE: New PBX - on prem or off?
You've said nothing regarding your on-prem vm capacity/capability?
Also, how is your LAN equipment - good, new, old, POE switches etc? -
RE: Ovirt
@scottalanmiller said in Ovirt:
Presumably using CentOS 7 and Gluster?
oVirt Node v 4.2.x is based on CentOS 7
v4.3 will include a Fedora (not sure if it'll be 28 or 29) based node -
RE: Ovirt
@mroth911 The current version 4.2.8 & up are real easy to setup.
It's a wizard based install using Cockpit.
First read through this blog post: https://www.ovirt.org/blog/2018/02/up-and-running-with-ovirt-4-2-and-gluster-storage.htmlHow many nodes do you have?
What are the details of your hardware?
Are you planning to do Hosted Engine + Gluster? -
RE: Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?
@black3dynamite said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:
Are those users set up with folder redirection or roaming profiles? That will be another challenge to deal with.
I don't believe they are.
-
RE: Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?
@Dashrender said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:
Are you also going to rebuild all the users computers?
Ideally, I should...
-
RE: Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?
@Dashrender said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:
@FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:
I've got to figure out how I can run in parallel with 2 different network/subnets
Why change the IP scheme?
Preference & it's an easy way to identify "rogue" devices.
Current scheme is 192.168.1.x
I'll do a 10.200.10.x (or something similar)
Which means I should never see any device with a 192.168.1.x address on the network.