ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login
    1. Topics
    2. biggen
    B
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 0
    • Topics 13
    • Posts 156
    • Groups 0

    biggen

    @biggen

    51
    Reputation
    637
    Profile views
    156
    Posts
    0
    Followers
    0
    Following
    Joined
    Last Online

    biggen Unfollow Follow

    Best posts made by biggen

    • RE: Why Do Vendors Use MAP Pricing?

      Disclaimer: I own a retail gift shop in a major tourist destination in Florida. Our local economy is 100% tourism based. I’m brick and mortar only. No online sales.

      I carry a few lines of brand name apparel that have MAP policies. I also can’t sell these items online via eBay, Amazon, Aliexpress, etc... Essentially no online marketplace is allowed for these brands. I can sell them at my own business website if I choose.

      I’m actually ok with their MAP policy. It levels the playing field with other retailers around me that may also carry the same brand. Everyone has to abide by the policy for external advertising. Some retailers who have larger purchasing power than me might get those goods at discounted prices from what I can buy them for (i.e. they are buying 2x or more than what im buying in a given year). It’s nice that they can’t advertise a retail price less than the MAP even since their wholesale costs are lower.

      It also prevents “loss leader” sale that is very common with larger box store retailers. I don’t have to worry about a store down the street advertising the same brand for $15 less than wholesale on an item just to get people in the door.

      The third reason I like it is the psychological effect of “perceived value”. I’ve done non-scientific tests in my store where I’ll price two very similar items at two very different prices. People seem to be drawn first to the higher priced items most of the time. It’s quite the thing to witness to be honest. Keeping the MAP price higher keeps its perceived value higher.

      So anyway that’s my two cents working in retail for 25+ years now. I, as a retailer and business owner, don’t mind MAP at all. Take it with a grain of salt. I understand this all doesn’t translate to IT which is what Scott was referring to in the OP. But I wanted to give a side of MAP that perhaps wasn’t considered.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • Older Axis IP cams & SMB1 issues...

      Anyone have any experience with older Axis cams running firmware that only allows you to mount shares via SMB1?

      I can't seem to get any of my old Axis cameras to mount shares on my SAMBA server running Ubuntu 18.04. I found this little tidbit from Axis: https://www.axis.com/support/faq/FAQ116392

      The cameras in question are indeed running firmware that is before 5.90. So according to that Axis FAQ, they should only support SMB1. But they do not connect to a default smb.conf file. Did SAMBA remove support for SMB1 by default?

      I've tried adding to the smb.conf file

      server min protocol = NT1
      client min protocol = NT1
      

      However, the cameras still won't connect. The errors I'm getting for on the camera logs themselves are:

      <CRITICAL> Nov 10 16:55:04 axis-00408cdbbd05 kernel: [72008.090000] CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -13
      <CRITICAL> Nov 10 16:55:04 axis-00408cdbbd05 kernel: [72008.210000] CIFS VFS: Send error in SessSetup = -13
      <WARNING > Nov 10 16:55:04 axis-00408cdbbd05 disks[1133]: mount_disks.c : Disk 'NetworkShare0' NOT mounted (due to error) (4)
      

      I'm wondering if its the SAMBA server itself that simply isn't honoring a SMB1 connection. Is there a trick to making sure that SMB1 is still being supported on Linux/SAMBA for legacy devices?

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: Older Axis IP cams & SMB1 issues...

      So I think I "may" have fixed it. I upped the logging level in Samba and noticed that it was a NTLM auth problem.

      So I added ntlm auth = yes which allows NTLMv1 clients to connect in the smb.conf file.

      SAMBA 4.5 changed the default method of NTLM to NTLMv2 clients only. Older clients that don't use NTLMv2 can't connect without changing this setting.

      What a PITA that was to diagnose.

      (https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smb.conf.5.html)

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: Do I need to run AD if I install Server 2019?

      Just as an update to this thread, I upgraded the host to an i9 9900 CPU (8c/16t). There is now plenty of horsepower to chew through the H.264 decoding without having to use Quick Sync.

      I'm happy I was able to keep it virtualized. I've been playing with XCP-NG and blown away how easy it is to use. I think I've found my new love...

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: No way to create larger than 2TB virtual disk with Xen or XCP-NG?

      @Dashrender said in No way to create larger than 2TB virtual disk with Xen or XCP-NG?:

      @biggen said in No way to create larger than 2TB virtual disk with Xen or XCP-NG?:

      @Dashrender said in No way to create larger than 2TB virtual disk with Xen or XCP-NG?:

      @biggen said in No way to create larger than 2TB virtual disk with Xen or XCP-NG?:

      @scottalanmiller Ok and that's fine. That's what I need to do then. For the camera server VM I'm working on i want it to record to a couple 12TB Exos X drives. So I have to figure out how to pass them through directly. I think Pete S. had a tutorial I need to hunt dkwn.

      Why stay with XCP-NG? why not move over to KVM?

      I've used KVM and really like it. Been running it on a Debian host for yeras. For the new host build, I wanted to try something different mainly. I was impressed with Xen and when I found out about xcp-ng I had to give it a spin.

      @olivier Great! I think I will just pass through the disks and be done with it. I could have gone the NAS route, but I have enough local storage to not have to use that option.

      Frankly, @Obsolesce might be the rightest here. Perhaps don't virtualize. Your storage requirement makes migrating to another platform more challenging - not saying not doable. and you plan to have a dedicated machine - with, now, likely directly provisioned storage due to the hypervisor of choice limitations.

      It's one thing to want to get more experience at something - but at the cost of an enterprise implementation seems foolish at best. Making the the most sound IT decision for the job at hand should be the goal - not furthering your education (that's what labs are really for).

      I have no desire to migrate this VM. It's just running a camera recording software suite for my business. Honestly, it's nice to have but not a necessity. I used to run it virtualized via KVM as well and also passed through the disks to make managing that much storage easier.

      At any rate, disk pass through was successful for xcp-ng. I appreciate everyone's input.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: Reconsidering ProxMox

      I've been playing with Proxmox quite a bit. Still love xcp-ng but Proxmox does somethings that xcp-ng doesn't. A built in host management interface for instance is wonderful.

      I do wish Proxmox supported MD. I know I can easily configure it but don't really want to do that.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: NVMe and RAID?

      @travisdh1 Yeah it would be a Debian VM providing the SMB share (via Proxmox or xcp-ng) so MD RAID isn't an issue. Proxmox can use ZFS Raid 1 whilst xcp-ng can do standard MD RAID.

      Edit: Dell even has that BOSS add-in system that allows for a RAID 1 bootable volume just for the OS. The NVMe drives could be VM storage only if I go that route.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: NVMe and RAID?

      @PhlipElder Excellent! Bookmarking your blog as well.

      On a side note, I really really like Mangolassi.it Actual realife sys admins who you can bounce stuff off and ask questions. Glad this site is doing well. Its always my first search for something technical that I know someone in here will have dealt with at some point in their career.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: What do you use for petabyte storage?

      An Isilon for surveillance cold storage?! I need to work for a company like this that wastes cash like its toilet paper.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: Weekend Plans

      Football. Good ole college football.

      posted in Water Closet
      B
      biggen

    Latest posts made by biggen

    • RE: POTS EOL?

      @jaredbusch Then have them upgrade. Seriously, what in IT lasts 10 years? Its time for a new unit that has cellular connectivity. All the contacts, PIR, etc.. could stay the same obviously as you well know being in the industry.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: POTS EOL?

      All of my alarms are installed with a cellular communicator only. My alarm guy says he only wires in telephone in the event there is no cellular coverage (which is non-existent unless extremely rural). I haven't had a telephone cellular communicator in over 5 years.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: Hotel and wifi isolation question

      @scottalanmiller Yup I understand. But my brain would have a hard to dumping wifi guests and corporate services all in the same subnet even if it knew the guests were already isolated. Personally, I'd rather do two VLANs in this case. Would be easy to remember that wifi guests are on 10.100.100.0/24 and corporate is on 10.200.200.0/24. 🙂

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: Hotel and wifi isolation question

      @scottalanmiller said in Hotel and wifi isolation question:

      @biggen said in Hotel and wifi isolation question:

      So my brainstorming becomes a rather trivial setup of placing all the APs onto one VLAN and make sure all APs are broadcasting the same SSID with guest network checked in the controller (for Unifi). Then downstream at the router, prevent the wifi guest VLAN from accessing any other VLAN internally.

      The point of the system is to remove the need for VLANs.

      I’d still like a separate network for guest wifi and separate network for corporate trusted wifi. So, no, a vlan isn’t needed I suppose. The two networks just need different subnets.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: Hotel and wifi isolation question

      @scottalanmiller I'm not sure I understand your last post. Are you saying that on a Unifi setup with L2 isolation activated that clients can or can't talk to other clients on different APs even on the same SSID?

      Edit: So just playing with a spare Unifi AP, enabling "guest network" for a SSID fully isolates clients not only connected to the AP, but also all clients in the subnet even if those clients are plugged into a physical port on the switch. So the AP must drop all unicast destined frames which is nice.

      So my brainstorming becomes a rather trivial setup of placing all the APs onto one VLAN and make sure all APs are broadcasting the same SSID with guest network checked in the controller (for Unifi). Then downstream at the router, prevent the wifi guest VLAN from accessing any other VLAN internally.

      Next time I check into a hotel I'm going to fire up nmap and see how locked down they are.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: Hotel and wifi isolation question

      @travisdh1 Yes, I saw they have the option to enable a "guest network". I was just reading about that here: https://help.ui.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000166827-UniFi-Guest-Network-Guest-Portal-and-Hotspot-System

      I'll have to play with it at home to see exactly what it does.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • Hotel and wifi isolation question

      I don't have a specific job in mind just brainstorming. I was thinking about how a 50 or 100 room hotel would handle wifi for clients while also trying to lock down the system to prevent Room 101 from accessing clients in Room 102. I'm thinking hotel wifi guest clients should only be allow to access the internet and nothing else. All on the same SSID throughout the facility.

      Lets say I wanted to place an AP in each room. So for a 100 room hotel, that's 100 APs dedicated for each room number (Room 101, 102, etc...). I know I can isolate clients at L2 via the AP SSID so they can't talk to one another when connected to the same AP. That would prevent in-room clients from talking to one another. But what about clients on different APs? Would a client from Room 101 still be able to talk to Room 102 because they are on different APs even with L2 isolation on?

      If they could, then wouldn't you also have to have a different VLAN for each AP and setup rules in the core router to prevent inter-vlan access? That seems complicated. Having to set the switch ports for all 100 APs to a different VLAN just to keep them segregated and then setup all the same corresponding VLANS in the router.

      What am I missing here? Is providing this much client isolation really this complicated?

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: Point of Sale System Recommendations, POS

      I use RevelPOS our retail business. Had it for about 7 years now. It’s ok. Uses iPads.

      I’d probably do Clover if I had to do it over again but it’s too much of a PITA to switch now.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: What do you use for petabyte storage?

      An Isilon for surveillance cold storage?! I need to work for a company like this that wastes cash like its toilet paper.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen
    • RE: What do you use for petabyte storage?

      @scottalanmiller Yeah I just wonder if this is only surveillance related, do they even have an IT dept that can do it?

      That autoloader that was linked above is only double the price of a single deck. Unreal how much decks cost.

      posted in IT Discussion
      B
      biggen