ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Netgear SC101 SAN

    IT Discussion
    storage san netgear netgear sc101 netgear sc101t zsan zetera
    4
    11
    3.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      I've often pointed out that the entire "guts" of the SC101 are nothing but a tiny NIC board that has a PATA controller added to it. There is almost zero logic in the system. It's a 100Mb/s Ethernet NIC (single port) with two PATA ports (or maybe only one, now that I think about it) with just enough basic logic to encapsulate ATA calls into the ZSAN protocol and put that raw onto the network (no security) via whatever IP address DHCP assigns. That's it. No CPU, no cache, no RAID logic, no SMART detection, no alert lights, no network settings, nothing.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        Here is the slightly modified SC101T. Different housing and look, same basics. The SATA and GigE upgrades were significant, but left all of the fundamental issues intact.

        0_1458750953519_netgear-sc101t-front.jpg

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • brianlittlejohnB
          brianlittlejohn
          last edited by

          I had an SC101 at one point.

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @brianlittlejohn
            last edited by

            @brianlittlejohn said:

            I had an SC101 at one point.

            I kept it as it was such a total disaster yet the best piece of teaching equipment that I ever found.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • J
              Jason Banned
              last edited by

              Why are we calling them just a SAN when they are a NAS on top of the SAN too.. just like the NetApp NAS devices (which I hate).

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @Jason
                last edited by

                @Jason said:

                Why are we calling them just a SAN when they are a NAS on top of the SAN too.. just like the NetApp NAS devices (which I hate).

                There is no NAS at all. It's pure SAN. Not a unified device, that was the point. This is one of the rare pure SANs in the SOHO / SMB market (along with Buffalo and Drobo products.) No NAS on top of the SAN here.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dafyreD
                  dafyre
                  last edited by

                  Correct me if I am wrong, but @scottalanmiller calls anything that does iSCSI / block level only a SAN....

                  A NAS is something that does NFS / Samba / etc.

                  J scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • J
                    Jason Banned @dafyre
                    last edited by

                    @dafyre said:

                    Correct me if I am wrong, but @scottalanmiller calls anything that does iSCSI / block level only a SAN....

                    A NAS is something that does NFS / Samba / etc.

                    Almost any NAS can do iSCSI a SAN is simplier than a NAS..

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @dafyre
                      last edited by

                      @dafyre said:

                      Correct me if I am wrong, but @scottalanmiller calls anything that does iSCSI / block level only a SAN....

                      A NAS is something that does NFS / Samba / etc.

                      That's correct. And something Unified Storage if it does both.

                      Unified Storage: ReadyNAS, Synology, QNAP, Netapp
                      SAN Only: Drobo B Series, SC101
                      NAS Only: Exablox

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Jason
                        last edited by

                        @Jason said:

                        Almost any NAS can do iSCSI a SAN is simplier than a NAS..

                        Exactly, but a few scale outs don't because of the scale out aspect.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1 / 1
                        • First post
                          Last post