Mac Mini as OSX Server + GlobalSan iSCSI
-
@scottalanmiller I found this:
http://wolfcrow.com/blog/a-comparison-of-10-thunderbolt-raid-storage-solutions/
It's a bit dated, but it gives some options... -
Is Dropbox that bad on resources? I have used it at a previous location prior to a different technology and it worked fine. It did exactly what it needed to do without issues. Just wondering why the move away from a distributed system to iSCSI when it isn't necessary.
-
Ive always stayed away from Drobo. i'll check into them again as well
Synology NAS's have SSD cache option.
really think be that much of a bottleneck using 1Gibe direct to the SAN for iSCSI LUN directly attached to mac? The write speeds I see would indeed be capped to 1Gbe speeds as the RAID-10 array disk read/writes would absolutely be faster than 1Gbe.. so i see the point.
but the data coming over the network would never be greater than 1Gbe... ?
-
@ntoxicator said:
but the data coming over the network would never be greater than 1Gbe... ?
There is overhead in that from the local system. Indexing, Backups etc.
-
I know internally the NAS or even DAS would have read/write capabilities which would exceed regular 1Gbe network transfer rates.
as a RAID-10 array with 4 disks of 7200 RPM drives would easily be in the 350-450MB/s range.
So if a user was pulling or saving or copying a file from their workstation, over to the network share. That file copy would only be at wire speed or network switching speeds.
Or am I missing a something
-
@ntoxicator said:
I know internally the NAS or even DAS would have read/write capabilities which would exceed regular 1Gbe network transfer rates.
as a RAID-10 array with 4 disks of 7200 RPM drives would easily be in the 350-450MB/s range.
So if a user was pulling or saving or copying a file from their workstation, over to the network share. That file copy would only be at wire speed or network switching speeds.
Or am I missing a something
Why would you go for a more complex setup when a simpler setup would actually work better?
-
You mean having the DAS?
Simply put, customer always complains and all their agents/users about dropbox. They're paying over 2 grand per year for Dropbox business.
Workstations disk space gets torn into and used up because dropbox data is pulled down onto each machine running the software.
Unless there is another distributed file solution that can make work for their Mac / Apple eco-system.
-
-
Look at this baby.. Just found QNAP has new product. But as any TB equiped device, you get hit with price
-
@ntoxicator said:
Look at this baby.. Just found QNAP has new product. But as any TB equiped device, you get hit with price
Don't get QNAP... oh man I (and most customers) have horror stories about how terrible those NASs are. Look at Netgear or Synology if you just need file storage.
-
Gotcha. Yeah, Personally I've always used Synology Diskstations or their Rackstation products.
Looking for other TB DAS units.. Promise has some nice units. But not seeing any that are empty without disks.
-
Agree with @coliver avoid QNAP. Support issues.
-
@ntoxicator said:
Gotcha. Yeah, Personally I've always used Synology Diskstations or their Rackstation products.
Looking for other TB DAS units.. Promise has some nice units. But not seeing any that are empty without disks.
Synology, ReadyNAS, ReadyDATA, Drobo and maybe Buffalo only. Look at no one else. Promise, Lacie, QNAP... these are not business class devices. You don't want that kind of stuff in your shop.
-
Drobo makes a good DAS product as well but last time I looked at them they were a bit lacking in performance.
-
@ntoxicator said:
Ive always stayed away from Drobo. i'll check into them again as well
This is specifically their sweet spot. Five bay, Thunderbolt connected DAS.
-
Do you need it to be run by the Mac Mini? I'm pretty sure the ReadyNAS does NFS storage which Macs can mount natively with a little program or script. They run a Debian fork under the hood and have Dropbox in their app marketplace as well.
-
@coliver said:
Drobo makes a good DAS product as well but last time I looked at them they were a bit lacking in performance.
Depends on the performance that you are looking at. Their read performance is awesome if you have an SSD cache added in. Write is pretty slow.
-
Like mac OSX server app to keep everything simple. As with the built in OpenDirectory and such.
-
@coliver said:
Do you need it to be run by the Mac Mini? I'm pretty sure the ReadyNAS does NFS storage which Macs can mount natively with a little program or script. They run a Debian fork under the hood and have Dropbox in their app marketplace as well.
It does but it lacks vfs_fruit so for a large scale Mac environment it is not idea, yet.
-
@ntoxicator I've had Apple's OpenDirectory corrupt on me both places I've implemented it. I dont like it at all. (Granted that was about 6 years ago)
