ShopTech EM2
-
This thread made me curious, I called the number on their website (which loaded since I'm in the US) and a live person answered.
-
@brianlittlejohn said:
This thread made me curious, I called the number on their website (which loaded since I'm in the US) and a live person answered.
Did you mention that we've been trying to reach them? Is your car what got them to respond to the contact I made?
-
I just said "sorry, wrong number and hung up". LOL
-
@brianlittlejohn said:
I just said "sorry, wrong number and hung up". LOL
Ha ha, okay, that's funnier.
-
You are still complaining and not using the primary communications means available to you. Their phone number. It is publicly available from a simple Google query. No need to whine about using google cached web pages.
This is 100% your failure to do anything useful.
-
@JaredBusch said:
You are still complaining and not using the primary communications means available to you. Their phone number. It is publicly available from a simple Google query. No need to whine about using google cached web pages.
This is 100% your failure to do anything useful.
I used their email that they provided and it opened a ticket. It's not me doing the whining. I reached out to them in every channel except one. You'd say the same thing about email if I used the phone or Facebook if I used whatever. You're looking for whatever channel I didn't use to claim it's the primary (and I would I know primary since they don't provide that information?)
You're not providing useful input here. I got a support ticket and no support. Are you saying that their ticket system isn't official or something?
-
And how did you determine that the phone number, which they don't make fully public, but the email which is shared equally is primary and not the more public and open channels that they provide? How would a customer know that the phone number is primary when not provided except in a Google cache and that the ticket system is some inferior system?
-
Just to be clear, since I did a Google search. For tech support it is the email, not the phone number that comes up as primary. The phone number only comes up under their elearning support page. So one is there, but I feel that claiming that it is primary is a bit extreme. That it is optional seems likely, but it is not what comes up for general contact.
-
It's the email address in the second link that I used and it created a support ticket to which there has been no response in over 24 hours.
-
You are complaining about not getting a direct communication with ShopTech. The best method of direct communications is in person.
I was assuming that you were not going to fly there to bitch at them, so the next best direct communication method is voice.There number is 100% publicly available with a very basic google search. You are being obtuse and intentionally dragging this situation out.
I have chosen not to provide you with said phone number before now because you are supposed to be intelligent enough to figure this out for yourself.
The number right on their website was provided in a screen shot above and you have chosen to ignore it and maintain your course of an out of business company intentionally.
You are sensationalizing a situation in an effort I can only assume is to drive traffic to this thread for your own benefit as we know this is now your job.
Here is a copy of the simple google search you could have used on day 1.
-
@JaredBusch said:
You are complaining about not getting a direct communication with ShopTech. The best method of direct communications is in person.
But I've achieved direct contact which I stated earlier in the thread. Besides getting a support ticket I have an IM channel with them from several hours ago. So what you are claiming here is incorrect. I don't know why you are so intent on defending them or trying to make me look bad. Yes, if the GOAL is a phone number, I can find one. I already provided it before you posted. But I already have contact.
You claimed that I was avoiding their primary channels. But I did not, as I showed. I used their primary channel. I also used their MORE public channels.
You are being obtuse trying to come up with any means of making this somehow my fault that their site doesn't work reliably, has wrong information on it, they don't respond to their primary channel based on Google, don't respond to their publicly provided channels for people that they have blocked out of their information, etc.
I'm trying to determine if the business is legit as a critical business concern. Should customers be relying on a company that is unable to keep their own site working or respond to people without special accommodations made for them? My job here is to provide information to customers and not to do whatever it takes to make a failing company look good.
I've gone above and beyond the call of duty to reach out to them and got a support ticket AND direct contact.
Nothing will make you happy here.
-
If the issue is that you can't directly contact them and talk to a human, Jared wins.
If the issue is that they don't respond well to tickets and need to be contacted directly (voice call), Scott wins.
If the issue is that you can't access their website from 3rd world counties, everyone wins.
Stop trying to contact US businesses from 3rd world countries. Problem solved.
Next? -
@scottalanmiller My issue with your approach is that you had a problem and jumped directly to this absurd conclusion that the company was out of business. If you had bothered to actually directly call them that day in addition to the other means of contact you attempted, you would have not had this days long lack of contact problem with the other means of contact.
Yes, the company is the one at fault for having poor controls in place on their website.
Yes, the company is the one at fault for having poor controls in place to monitor feedback on their social media channels.
Yes, the company is the one at fault for having poor controls in place to reply more quickly to emails.None of that negates the fact that you did not use a basic communication method that was at your disposal to contact them.
-
@art_of_shred said:
If the issue is that you can't directly contact them and talk to a human, Jared wins.
If the issue is that they don't respond well to tickets and need to be contacted directly (voice call), Scott wins.
If the issue is that you can't access their website from 3rd world counties, everyone wins.
Stop trying to contact US businesses from 3rd world countries. Problem solved.
Next?The issue is.... trying to determine what kind of company they are, what condition they are in, if they respond to tickets, if they are in business, if they are viable....
This is IT research for customers. It's not about coddling vendors and defending vendors, it is determining exactly what condition a vendor is in after discovering that they have an issue with their web page that was enough to question if things were healthy.
I've had vendors have phones directly to someone at a house before who would claim that the business was still around but it was not. They wanted to make sales even though no one was working there anymore. If you work hard enough you can generally get someone to respond. The question is... is there someone actively checking tickets, support channels, etc.
-
@JaredBusch said:
@scottalanmiller My issue with your approach is that you had a problem and jumped directly to this absurd conclusion that the company was out of business.
When did I jump to this? Only after many days of no contact. I originally only felt that they looked out of business to potential customers who are not technical and would have no idea how to track them down. It was only later after not responding to anything and having their channels go dead that I started to question their actual status.
-
@JaredBusch said:
If you had bothered to actually directly call them that day in addition to the other means of contact you attempted, you would have not had this days long lack of contact problem with the other means of contact.
But getting a gauge on the response time of the only "official" channels provided (you can't claim Google cache that they tried to hide is official, they've even implied that blocking me from that info was intentional) was the goal once their official website info was blocked. Reaching someone "by any means" was not a goal.
-
@JaredBusch said:
None of that negates the fact that you did not use a basic communication method that was at your disposal to contact them.
To be clear, I used five basic methods. I used them in the order that they were officially provided by the vendor. I went...
- To the official website which provided no additional info as to contact.
- To their public social media feeds that were not restricted to me
- Their corporate Twitter direct contact (an email system)
- Their product Twitter direct contact (an email system)
- Their Facebook IM (direct IM system)
- Their public Twitter corporate
- Their public Twitter product
- The Facebook feed public
- Direct email through the primary method provided by them through Google cache
Additionally I went the unofficial route of posting in a public forum and letting them know about it so that they would have that mode as well if they so chose.
Saying that I skipped a basic means to contact them makes it sound like I didn't follow many basic methods and not in the order as would be reasonably deemed as "official" as possible given that they specifically restrict email and telephone info from me AND the email is global but their phone number is not.
-
I'm getting a call back from them.
-
From Mexico I get the CloudFlare security check and then get properly redirected to their homepage.
-
A few things we have learned thus far from speaking with them:
- They are aware that they are blocking some regions.
- They are not aware where they are blocking and thought that I could not be where I am.
- The Google cached contact info is not the primary channel. Don't know if it works or not yet, but it is not the right info for email at least.
