HTML help

scottalanmiller

Maybe your issue is with the context of this tag and not the tag itself.

did you try mine? you need http:// for it to be complaint.

thanksajdotcom

@thecreativeone91 said:

did you try mine? you need http:// for it to be complaint.

that's a possibility

IRJ

@thecreativeone91 said:

did you try mine? you need http:// for it to be complaint.

testing now....

IRJ

@thecreativeone91 said:

did you try mine? you need http:// for it to be complaint.

Thanks!

IRJ

I don't think anyone realized the logo wasn't showing up for 5 minutes

IRJ

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

thanksajdotcom

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

NTG has a client that has a program that does that as well.

thanksajdotcom

@thanksajdotcom said:

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

NTG has a client that has a program that does that as well.

I don't remember the name of the utility though. It's a licensed utility though...

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.

IRJ

@thanksajdotcom said:

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

NTG has a client that has a program that does that as well.

I did mine via HTML as a rule in Exchange. Once you populate everything in AD, it works great.

IRJ

@thecreativeone91 said:

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.

You can't tell Management that, though.

thanksajdotcom

@thecreativeone91 said:

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.

The reason I hate it is that when you send emails to open tickets in any system, it attaches the image from every email sent as an attachment to the case...UGH!

IRJ

I tried my best to implement text signatures, but that didn't fly.

scottalanmiller

@IRJ said:

@thecreativeone91 said:

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.

You can't tell Management that, though.

I do. It turns off potential customers. Lots of people (in my limited experience) find that stuff rude because it means you aren't being considerate of the recipient and aren't actually thinking about what you are doing. Rarely do they work and mostly look bad anyway. Lots of negatives, very little potential positive.

IRJ

@scottalanmiller said:

@IRJ said:

@thecreativeone91 said:

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.

You can't tell Management that, though.

I do. It turns off potential customers. Lots of people (in my limited experience) find that stuff rude because it means you aren't being considerate of the recipient and aren't actually thinking about what you are doing. Rarely do they work and mostly look bad anyway. Lots of negatives, very little potential positive.

I agree. I tried to fight that battle, but was quickly turned away and told to use images. Especially when mobile emails are text only.

scottalanmiller

@IRJ said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@IRJ said:

@thecreativeone91 said:

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.

You can't tell Management that, though.

I do. It turns off potential customers. Lots of people (in my limited experience) find that stuff rude because it means you aren't being considerate of the recipient and aren't actually thinking about what you are doing. Rarely do they work and mostly look bad anyway. Lots of negatives, very little potential positive.

I agree. I tried to fight that battle, but was quickly turned away and told to use images. Especially when mobile emails are text only.

Did you talk in terms of negative PR and lost revenue?

IRJ

@scottalanmiller said:

@IRJ said:

@scottalanmiller said:

@IRJ said:

@thecreativeone91 said:

@IRJ said:

P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.

I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.

You can't tell Management that, though.

I do. It turns off potential customers. Lots of people (in my limited experience) find that stuff rude because it means you aren't being considerate of the recipient and aren't actually thinking about what you are doing. Rarely do they work and mostly look bad anyway. Lots of negatives, very little potential positive.

I agree. I tried to fight that battle, but was quickly turned away and told to use images. Especially when mobile emails are text only.

Did you talk in terms of negative PR and lost revenue?

Not in this particular instance, but I mentioned that the majority of users are using mobile devices and it looks horrible to get images when using text email.

scottalanmiller

@IRJ said:

Not in this particular instance, but I mentioned that the majority of users are using mobile devices and it looks horrible to get images when using text email.

Not much of a fight in that case, then.

IRJ

This post is deleted!