Samba Server Configuration in Centos 6.2
-
I think he's thinking he has to view the shares in the browser.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
I think he's thinking he has to view the shares in the browser.
and he may be equating Explorer to INTERNET Explorer. Two totally different things.
-
@Lakshmana, it sounds like you want a SAMBA server for SMB shares. You do not want FTP in this case. SAMBA isn't too bad but setting it up on CentOS isn't something I've done. The key things are setting up the shares themselves, and the permissions. However, why do you need to setup a SAMBA server to test if a motherboard is working? Isn't the fact something booted and the OS is loading evidence enough?
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
You do not want FTP in this case. SAMBA isn't too bad but setting it up on CentOS isn't something I've done.
It's the same anywhere, once you've installed which is just "yum install samba"
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
You do not want FTP in this case. SAMBA isn't too bad but setting it up on CentOS isn't something I've done.
It's the same anywhere, once you've installed which is just "yum install samba"
Ok. I've set it up but I had tutorials I was following. I don't remember all the steps off the top of my head. I know you have to setup shares in the smb.conf file and point to the directories, set permissions, etc. Also, creating groups and/or users is important too.
-
This is an example of one of my shares in my /etc/samba/smb.conf file.
[goflex_landcare] comment = GoFlex Landcare path = /media/goflex_landcare available = yes public = yes writable = yes browsable = yes guest ok = yes read only = no create mask = 0755 -
Now, I use the /media/goflex_landcare folder to mount my NAS into, but the principal is the same.
-
@thanksajdotcom My client company projects are Centos with RAID1.Last week there was an issue found at RAID 1.So my senior needs to check the basic things are working properly.The motherboard of my client is not working so they are trying to buy the motherboard othr Asus.So we are under going at testing whether the data can be accessed after changing the hard disk in other motherboard
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
You do not want FTP in this case. SAMBA isn't too bad but setting it up on CentOS isn't something I've done.
It's the same anywhere, once you've installed which is just "yum install samba"
You probably want to install samba-common too and possibly the client.
-
@Lakshmana said:
@thanksajdotcom My client company projects are Centos with RAID1.Last week there was an issue found at RAID 1.So my senior needs to check the basic things are working properly.
If the box is up, RAID is fixed. It's already tested. RAID cannot impact services. Either the system works or it doesn't, it is black and white.
-
@Lakshmana said:
@thanksajdotcom My client company projects are Centos with RAID1.Last week there was an issue found at RAID 1.So my senior needs to check the basic things are working properly.The motherboard of my client is not working so they are trying to buy the motherboard othr Asus.So we are under going at testing whether the data can be accessed after changing the hard disk in other motherboard
Ok, if you're testing if data can be accessed...I'm confused. Is the RAID rebuilt? Can't you just test access locally and verify all the files are there? You could even use something like SCP to copy the files to another Linux box and then see if you can read them from there. That would be easier, IMO.
-
@Lakshmana said:
@thanksajdotcom My client company projects are Centos with RAID1.Last week there was an issue found at RAID 1.So my senior needs to check the basic things are working properly.The motherboard of my client is not working so they are trying to buy the motherboard othr Asus.So we are under going at testing whether the data can be accessed after changing the hard disk in other motherboard
It sounds like you just need to access things the way that they were accessed before. Why do something new?
-
@Lakshmana said:
@thanksajdotcom My client company projects are Centos with RAID1.Last week there was an issue found at RAID 1.So my senior needs to check the basic things are working properly.The motherboard of my client is not working so they are trying to buy the motherboard othr Asus.So we are under going at testing whether the data can be accessed after changing the hard disk in other motherboard
This isn't really the best way to do this. Why does he not just look from the terminal or use SCP to browse the files.
-
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@Lakshmana said:
@thanksajdotcom My client company projects are Centos with RAID1.Last week there was an issue found at RAID 1.So my senior needs to check the basic things are working properly.The motherboard of my client is not working so they are trying to buy the motherboard othr Asus.So we are under going at testing whether the data can be accessed after changing the hard disk in other motherboard
This isn't really the best way to do this. Why does he not just look from the terminal or use SCP to browse the files.
Beat ya to it!
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
Ok, if you're testing if data can be accessed...I'm confused. Is the RAID rebuilt?
What he's testing won't even tell him if RAID is fixed or not. It will tell the manager nothing.
-
-
@Lakshmana said:
@Lakshmana said:
clien
I cant understand scott
SCP is a way to copy files from one Linux box to another. You can even download a free tool like WinSCP for Windows and copy files from the Linux box to the Windows box and try to open them in notepad or whatever, depending on the file type.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
Ok, if you're testing if data can be accessed...I'm confused. Is the RAID rebuilt?
What he's testing won't even tell him if RAID is fixed or not. It will tell the manager nothing.
Even if it's not rebuilt the files will still be there with a broken RAID (well depending on how broken).
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
Ok, if you're testing if data can be accessed...I'm confused. Is the RAID rebuilt?
What he's testing won't even tell him if RAID is fixed or not. It will tell the manager nothing.
That's what I'm saying. I'm confused by what he's saying he's trying to accomplish versus what he's doing.
