ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    [How to] Fail2ban on CentOS 7

    IT Discussion
    9
    24
    9.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • nadnerBN
      nadnerB @A Former User
      last edited by nadnerB

      Thanks @thecreativeone91
      A few quick edits of enable --> enabled and a restart of the service(?) and it's good to go.

      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • ?
        A Former User @nadnerB
        last edited by

        I wrote a script to do this.

        #!/bin/bash
        
        # CentOS7 Fail2Ban Install and Configure Script
        
        yum install -y epel-release fail2ban checkpolicy policycoreutils-python firewalld
        
        cat > /etc/fail2ban/jail.local << EOF
        [sshd]
        enabled = true
        EOF
        
        cat > fail2ban-syslog.te << EOF
        module fail2ban-syslog 1.0;
        
        require {
        type syslogd_var_run_t;
        type fail2ban_t;
        class dir read;
        class file read;
        class file open;
        class file getattr;
        }
        
        #============= fail2ban_t ==============
        allow fail2ban_t syslogd_var_run_t:dir read;
        allow fail2ban_t syslogd_var_run_t:file read;
        allow fail2ban_t syslogd_var_run_t:file open;
        allow fail2ban_t syslogd_var_run_t:file getattr;
        EOF
        
        checkmodule -M -m -o fail2ban-syslog.mod fail2ban-syslog.te
        semodule_package -o fail2ban-syslog.pp -m fail2ban-syslog.mod
        semodule -i fail2ban-syslog.pp
        
        systemctl start fail2ban
        
        systemctl enable fail2ban
        
        fail2ban-client status sshd
        
        echo Done!
        

        Anything I missed?

        DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DanpD
          Danp @A Former User
          last edited by

          @Aaron-Studer You left out the steps that create the sshd.local file. Was this intentional?

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DanpD
            Danp
            last edited by

            Seems like Fail2Ban stops logging after a log rotation. Anyone else run into this?

            ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • ?
              A Former User @Danp
              last edited by

              @Danp said:

              Seems like Fail2Ban stops logging after a log rotation. Anyone else run into this?

              I don't think Fail2ban likes log rotate.

              DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DanpD
                Danp @A Former User
                last edited by

                @thecreativeone91 said:

                I don't think Fail2ban likes log rotate.

                Looks that way. I found this, but it's for an older version of both F2B and Centos.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DanpD
                  Danp
                  last edited by

                  Added "copytruncate" to the F2B logrotate configuration file and then ran a manual log rotation. Seemed to work ok (system is still logging to fail2ban.log), but I will continue to monitor.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • S
                    Sparkum
                    last edited by

                    When I do

                    fail2ban-client status sshd

                    I get

                    [root@dc fail2ban]# fail2ban-client status sshd
                    ERROR NOK: ('sshd',)
                    Sorry but the jail 'sshd' does not exist

                    When I check the audit logs I get logs....

                    DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DanpD
                      Danp @Sparkum
                      last edited by

                      @Sparkum What do you get when you enter the following?:

                      fail2ban-client status
                      
                      S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • S
                        Sparkum @Danp
                        last edited by Sparkum

                        @Danp

                        [root@dc fail2ban]# fail2ban-client status
                        Status
                        |- Number of jail: 0
                        `- Jail list:

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DanpD
                          Danp
                          last edited by

                          Did you follow the steps and create the jail.local file?

                          S 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • S
                            Sparkum @Danp
                            last edited by

                            @Danp

                            Yep

                            fail.PNG

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • S
                              Sparkum
                              last edited by

                              Noticed the problem happened below.

                              Changed "enabled" to "enable" and looks like it works.

                              Status for the jail: sshd
                              |- Filter
                              | |- Currently failed: 0
                              | |- Total failed: 0
                              | - File list: /var/log/secure - Actions
                              |- Currently banned: 0
                              |- Total banned: 0
                              `- Banned IP list:

                              Much appreciated thanks

                              DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DanpD
                                Danp @Sparkum
                                last edited by

                                @Sparkum That's strange, b/c I believe "enabled" is the correct entry.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • 1
                                • 2
                                • 2 / 2
                                • First post
                                  Last post