21:9 Monitors, anyone?
-
Use. Paragraphs.
-
I have to agree - I stopped reading 3 lines in because my eyes just started to cross, and this is something I'm interested in as a way to get rid of having two screens on my desk with a bezel in the middle.
-
I did use paragraph breaks... I typed this all on mobile, perhaps that had something to do with it. I'll break it up in a few.
-
@Dashrender, @ajstringham, there
-
Actually planning on grabbing one of these.
-
that seems like a lot of money for a monitor. but you have fun w/ that.
-
@Hubtech but it will be a high quality display for many years to come.
-
@Mike-Ralston said:
@Hubtech but it will be a high quality display for many years to come.
Yeah man, if it makes you happy, get it!
-
@Mike-Ralston said:
@Hubtech but it will be a high quality display for many years to come.
you mean 3-5 years which tends to be the average life span? I've spent more on ones before but they were broadcast monitors, used for making money.
-
@thecreativeone91 So long as 4:3, 5:4, 16:9, 16:10, and 21:9 monitors continue to be supported, this can encompass and perform well with any of these standards. And the markets are slow to change. I don't think 16:9 will be going anywhere for a while, and 21:9 is growing in popularity. It's early enough in it's lifecycle that one of these monitors will be very useful for probably upwards of 5 years. After all, people still use VGA, and that came out in 1987. And I'm not super picky for displays, I'll be coming from dual 21" 1280 x 1024 monitors. So I'll most likely get around 8 years of use before I feel the need to upgrade again, unless some huge paradigm shift happens in the display peripheral world.
