ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Help setting up routing

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    routingfirewall
    21 Posts 6 Posters 1.9k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • JaredBuschJ
      JaredBusch @Dashrender
      last edited by

      @Dashrender Yes

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • pmonchoP
        pmoncho @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said in Help setting up routing:

        I need some assistance understanding in general, and we'll use a ER-X for specifics in the following scenario.

        ISP will provide /29 of usable IPs (125.25.25.6/29)
        Static assignment 125.25.25.1 - 172.16.16.200.11
        Static assignment 125.25.25.2 - 172.16.16.200.12
        Static assignment 125.25.25.3 - 172.16.16.200.13
        Static assignment 125.25.25.4 - 172.16.16.200.14
        Static assignment 125.25.25.5 - 172.16.16.200.15
        Static assignment 125.25.25.6 - 172.16.16.200.x (all others)
        ISP connection to your router will be over non public routable connection 10.100.100.2/30
        ISP Default Gate 10.100.100.1
        Internal network will be NATed 172.16.200.x/24

        Assuming Port 0 is the WAN port, I assume we'll assign 10.100.100.2/30 to port 0, and the DG as 10.100.100.1.

        Assuming Port 1 is LAN port, assign 172.16.200.1/24.

        I don't know what to do with the the 125.25.25.6/29 address so my LAN is NAT'ed, and then sent via the 10. network.

        Thanks for any insight.

        I have a question about this setup (just for my general understanding of networking).

        Would this be considered a double nat situation? If so, does this create any issues with users on your 172. network?

        JaredBuschJ DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch @Dashrender
          last edited by JaredBusch

          @Dashrender said in Help setting up routing:

          ISP connection to your router will be over non public routable connection 10.100.100.2/30
          ISP Default Gate 10.100.100.1
          Internal network will be NATed 172.16.200.x/24
          Assuming Port 0 is the WAN port, I assume we'll assign 10.100.100.2/30 to port 0, and the DG as 10.100.100.1.
          Assuming Port 1 is LAN port, assign 172.16.200.1/24.
          I don't know what to do with the the 125.25.25.6/29 address so my LAN is NAT'ed, and then sent via the 10. network.

          It is not a private network, but the NAT examples above are on a router where that /29 is not on any interface.

          The only WAN IP is a /30 from AT&T.
          7eda3de0-3dbb-42b8-8631-1a5278161e2e-image.png
          9df3edfd-01ae-48e1-9c48-04423bf589c8-image.png

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch
            last edited by JaredBusch

            Basically, when I order fiber service from an ISP, I refuse their termination router.

            So they drop in fiber, and a router that converts the fiber to ehternet. I hook my router up there.

            The Fiber services (from the 3 companies I have used so far) all terminate on a /30. That is what I put on my router as the WAN. See above.

            But then I make NAT rules to route all the traffic via the IP that they should show. See config posts above.

            The only time I ever use the /30 IP if for VPN connectivity.

            Your setup should be identical. Just the ISP provides a 10. instead of a public IP for that part of the routing.

            FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @pmoncho
              last edited by

              @pmoncho said in Help setting up routing:

              Would this be considered a double nat situation?

              It depends on the ISP, but I would assume not in this scenario. it sounds like normal routed traffic.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @pmoncho
                last edited by

                @pmoncho said in Help setting up routing:

                Would this be considered a double nat situation? If so, does this create any issues with users on your 172. network?

                As Jared said - no, it's not a double NAT, at least not in my example

                pmonchoP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                  last edited by

                  @JaredBusch said in Help setting up routing:

                  @pmoncho said in Help setting up routing:

                  Would this be considered a double nat situation?

                  It depends on the ISP, but I would assume not in this scenario. it sounds like normal routed traffic.

                  That was my thinking, I didn't see an extra NAT anywhere.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • FATeknollogeeF
                    FATeknollogee @JaredBusch
                    last edited by

                    @JaredBusch Just curious, what it the /23 on eth3, is that one of your LAN IP blocks from AT&T?

                    JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • pmonchoP
                      pmoncho @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @Dashrender said in Help setting up routing:

                      @pmoncho said in Help setting up routing:

                      Would this be considered a double nat situation? If so, does this create any issues with users on your 172. network?

                      As Jared said - no, it's not a double NAT, at least not in my example

                      I was only thinking of double NAT, as the ISP uses private 10.x and you use private 172.16.x and that would create a double NAT. My bad.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @FATeknollogee
                        last edited by

                        @FATeknollogee said in Help setting up routing:

                        @JaredBusch Just curious, what it the /23 on eth3, is that one of your LAN IP blocks from AT&T?

                        No. That is the LAN.

                        FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • FATeknollogeeF
                          FATeknollogee @JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          @JaredBusch Got it. I now see that it's a 10.202.0.x vs your LAN IP of 10.202.8.x - men, need to put my glasses on!

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @FATeknollogee
                            last edited by

                            @FATeknollogee said in Help setting up routing:

                            @JaredBusch Just curious, what it the /23 on eth3, is that one of your LAN IP blocks from AT&T?

                            AT&T can't issue private IP addresses.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1
                            • 2
                            • 2 / 2
                            • First post
                              Last post