ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?

    IT Discussion
    7
    25
    371
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • jmooreJ
      jmoore @FATeknollogee
      last edited by

      @FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

      new SM server: F29 w KVM to host new version of LOB

      What is LOB?

      FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @FATeknollogee
        last edited by

        @FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

        I've got to figure out how I can run in parallel with 2 different network/subnets

        Why change the IP scheme?

        FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • FATeknollogeeF
          FATeknollogee @jmoore
          last edited by

          @jmoore said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

          @FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

          new SM server: F29 w KVM to host new version of LOB

          What is LOB?

          Line of Business

          jmooreJ DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • jmooreJ
            jmoore @FATeknollogee
            last edited by

            @FATeknollogee Oh, thanks

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender @FATeknollogee
              last edited by

              @FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

              I've got to figure out how I can run in parallel

              This will definitely be the most challenging part.

              Getting people still on the old systems to be able to connect to the new systems.

              I'd consider setting up domain trusts

              with 2 different network/subnets

              I suppose this could be a good idea, you could setup each subnet with it's own DHCP server so DNS is right for each domain - but each domain will need to know about the DNS of the other anyhow, assuming you setup Domain trusts.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @FATeknollogee
                last edited by

                @FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                @jmoore said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                @FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                new SM server: F29 w KVM to host new version of LOB

                What is LOB?

                Line of Business

                LOL - I thought he was asking what the app was, i.e. the name of the app.

                jmooreJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender
                  last edited by

                  Are you also going to rebuild all the users computers?

                  FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • FATeknollogeeF
                    FATeknollogee @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                    @FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                    I've got to figure out how I can run in parallel with 2 different network/subnets

                    Why change the IP scheme?

                    Preference & it's an easy way to identify "rogue" devices.
                    Current scheme is 192.168.1.x
                    I'll do a 10.200.10.x (or something similar)
                    Which means I should never see any device with a 192.168.1.x address on the network.

                    JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • FATeknollogeeF
                      FATeknollogee @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @Dashrender said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                      Are you also going to rebuild all the users computers?

                      Ideally, I should...

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • jmooreJ
                        jmoore @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender I just didn't know what the abbreviation stood for is all

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • black3dynamiteB
                          black3dynamite
                          last edited by

                          Are those users set up with folder redirection or roaming profiles? That will be another challenge to deal with.

                          FATeknollogeeF 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • FATeknollogeeF
                            FATeknollogee @black3dynamite
                            last edited by

                            @black3dynamite said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                            Are those users set up with folder redirection or roaming profiles? That will be another challenge to deal with.

                            I don't believe they are.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • JaredBuschJ
                              JaredBusch @FATeknollogee
                              last edited by

                              @FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                              @Dashrender said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                              @FATeknollogee said in Existing AD...prefer to create New Site?:

                              I've got to figure out how I can run in parallel with 2 different network/subnets

                              Why change the IP scheme?

                              Preference & it's an easy way to identify "rogue" devices.
                              Current scheme is 192.168.1.x
                              I'll do a 10.200.10.x (or something similar)
                              Which means I should never see any device with a 192.168.1.x address on the network.

                              This part is simple, you just add the 10.X.X.X to everything and add a rule to route between it and the 192.

                              You don't care about connectivity at this point.

                              Everyone will still use the old LoB app on the new network, you jsut might have to teach them to runas or something depending on how it actually runs.

                              Simplified, but you get the idea.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • 1
                              • 2
                              • 2 / 2
                              • First post
                                Last post