Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup
-
@dustinb3403 said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
@scottalanmiller said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
@obsolesce said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
I'm sure there are cases for it, but not typically as with your own Nextcloud. There, is only one copy of data and no version control or geo redundancy.
NextCloud has version control. And as many copies and as much geo-redundancy as you desire.
But it doesn't include this geo-redundancy with a build it yourself approach. (Usually)
It does every time you choose it.
It's like saying "deploying your own servers don't have passwords." Of course they always do, if you set the password. You can't use "people decide not to do it" for a deploy it yourself solution as if it is lacking it. Everyone chooses how to deploy, everyone has the option.
It would be like saying that most cars you drive yourself can't drive to the beach, but in reality you just meant that most people drive to the grocery store rather than the beach. It's not that the car doesn't go where you want, it's that you chose not to go there with it. Very different things.
ODfB has the amount of georedundancy and protections that it comes with, no more, no less. It has a set amount. NextCloud has as much, or as little, of both as the deployer desires. NextCloud has more protection, optionally, than ODfB.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
@dustinb3403 said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
@scottalanmiller said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
@obsolesce said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
I'm sure there are cases for it, but not typically as with your own Nextcloud. There, is only one copy of data and no version control or geo redundancy.
NextCloud has version control. And as many copies and as much geo-redundancy as you desire.
But it doesn't include this geo-redundancy with a build it yourself approach. (Usually)
It does every time you choose it.
It's like saying "deploying your own servers don't have passwords." Of course they always do, if you set the password. You can't use "people decide not to do it" for a deploy it yourself solution as if it is lacking it. Everyone chooses how to deploy, everyone has the option.
It would be like saying that most cars you drive yourself can't drive to the beach, but in reality you just meant that most people drive to the grocery store rather than the beach. It's not that the car doesn't go where you want, it's that you chose not to go there with it. Very different things.
ODfB has the amount of georedundancy and protections that it comes with, no more, no less. It has a set amount. NextCloud has as much, or as little, of both as the deployer desires. NextCloud has more protection, optionally, than ODfB.
This is true only to a certain degree. It seems like an exaggeration in my perspesctive. You can make it geo-redundand using external piece of software, of course… like 99% of the software out there.
-
Scott's argument is that anyone can choose to rent hundreds of servers around the globe to create this geo-redundancy.
The question is, how many people would or can afford that?
-
Seems like it'd cost a lot more money to implement NC to be the same as what you get by default with OD.
-
I get a lot with OD for $99 a year. I think it'd cost a lot more money, time, labor to get the same from a do it myself NC implementation.
-
I get that with OD you don't get to choose to add more geo-redundancy or really anything else.
This though likely isn't a concern for 99.99% of businesses around the world.
-
@obsolesce said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
I get a lot with OD for $99 a year. I think it'd cost a lot more money, time, labor to get the same from a do it myself NC implementation.
I never dug into it, maybe I'm wrong, but it seems so anyways.
-
OD can make sense, when the price per user is low, this other options like NC become less to consider.
No need to buy servers and setup GR. It's already done for you.
But you have to work within the system you've rented.
-
@obsolesce said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
I get a lot with OD for $99 a year. I think it'd cost a lot more money, time, labor to get the same from a do it myself NC implementation.
How much capacity do you get from OD at that price? 1TB? 10TB? I have no idea.
-
At approximately $12/user you get 1TB/user
-
@dustinb3403 said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
At approximately $12/user you get 1TB/user
Anyone know what backups cost?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
@obsolesce said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
I get a lot with OD for $99 a year. I think it'd cost a lot more money, time, labor to get the same from a do it myself NC implementation.
How much capacity do you get from OD at that price? 1TB? 10TB? I have no idea.
What I have gives you for O365 personal gives you 1tb per user, up to 5 users included, plus office suite and Skype minutes.
-
@dustinb3403 said in Evaluating OneDrive for Business to replace traditional end point backup:
At approximately $12/user you get 1TB/user
Yeah but you also get Exchange and a full Office Suite.
