ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Hypervisor with small storage

    IT Discussion
    kvm convergence
    2
    2
    516
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Emad RE
      Emad R
      last edited by

      Hi,

      What's your thoughts on KVM nodes with 64 GB usb flash drives that are good with 70 mb write speed and 130 read , like really good qaulity USB drive or even SSD 64 GB SATA storage, and saving all that on another storage server.

      Basically what I am saying how can I make KVM node diskless , like pure compute nodes , what's your thoughts and if those nodes saved to OBR are they converged infrastructure or traditional.

      What if I add glusterfs or DRBL to the storage instead OBR will that be considered converged or even hyperconverged

      travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • travisdh1T
        travisdh1 @Emad R
        last edited by

        @emad-r If you want diskless, look at setting up a PXE server to boot them from the network.

        If you just want minimal drives locally, then go with the small SSD. I've not found a USB stick that has the same sort of write endurance yet, and have had many fail on me when being used for the OS, temp files, and logging.

        Gluster would just be a normal network mount point to the compute nodes, and DRBL is another way to network boot.

        Converged or hyper-converged really doesn't matter, you want the most cost effective hardware to do the job.

        Without knowing more about what you're trying to accomplish, we can't give anything but generic advice, and even that could be completely wrong.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • 1 / 1
        • First post
          Last post