ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Intel CPU question

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    inteli5i7processorsresearch
    43 Posts 11 Posters 5.6k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender
      last edited by

      I still standardize on 8 GB. But at our next upgrade I'll take a look to see if 16 is really needed.

      I buy display port monitors now for display port machines.... love the single cable, no convertors.

      jmooreJ wrx7mW 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • jmooreJ
        jmoore @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @dashrender said in Intel CPU question:

        I still standardize on 8 GB. But at our next upgrade I'll take a look to see if 16 is really needed.

        I buy display port monitors now for display port machines.... love the single cable, no convertors.

        yeah I do the same. been great

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • Reid CooperR
          Reid Cooper
          last edited by

          8GB, i5, SSD... tends to do the trick.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
          • jmooreJ
            jmoore @JaredBusch
            last edited by

            @jaredbusch said in Intel CPU question:

            So this is what I am sending off to my preferred VAR.

            Desktops: Quantity 9
            Option A:
            HP EliteDesk 800 G3 Tower
            Windows 10 Pro
            Intel Core i5 7600
            16GB RAM
            256 GB SSD
            Intel 8265 802.11 ac with Bluetooth 4.2
            No optical drive
            HP Wireless Business Slim Keyboard and Mouse

            Option B:
            HP EliteDesk 800 G3 Tower
            Windows 10 Pro
            Intel Core i7 7700
            16GB RAM
            256 GB SSD
            Intel 8265 802.11 ac with Bluetooth 4.2
            No optical drive
            HP Wireless Business Slim Keyboard and Mouse

            For the memory in both of these desktop options, if it is more cost effective to get 8GB and an additional 8GB separate, please quote it as such.

            Laptop: Quantity 1
            Make it the same as the one just ordered for IPMA

            Monitors: Quantity 13
            Option A:
            HP V273a

            Option B:
            HP 27sv

            Similar model 27” monitors are acceptable. These were pulled from HP’s website.
            Display port to HDMI needed per monitor as the EliteDesk has 2 Display Ports and both of these monitors have HDMI

            I think that is a great lineup. It might be a little ram heavy depending on the users but at same time its future proofing some. Looks good

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • wrx7mW
              wrx7m @Dashrender
              last edited by

              @dashrender said in Intel CPU question:

              I still standardize on 8 GB. But at our next upgrade I'll take a look to see if 16 is really needed.

              I buy display port monitors now for display port machines.... love the single cable, no convertors.

              You can get dp to hdmi cables. I was using adapters from monoprice but had several cause intermittent issues so I decided to do the single cable solution and it seems to be much better so far.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • wrx7mW
                wrx7m
                last edited by

                @jmoore said in Intel CPU question:

                @reid-cooper said in Intel CPU question:

                Even an i5 is typically overkill today. What kind of workloads will these run?

                I totally agree. Bottlenecks are hardly ever the cpu, they are almost always disk and memory. I have been going round and round with my management on this. They buy I7's but a mix of 5400/7200 hard drives. The i5 would be just fine for general use.

                I have been buying SSDs, for users, exclusively, for about 6 months and it is by far the most noticeable improvement. Period.

                I have personally been using SSDs for several years after the amazement of the massive performance increase. Nothing has improved performance so dramatically in the past 15+ years like SSDs.

                Reid CooperR jmooreJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • Reid CooperR
                  Reid Cooper @wrx7m
                  last edited by

                  @wrx7m said in Intel CPU question:

                  @jmoore said in Intel CPU question:

                  @reid-cooper said in Intel CPU question:

                  Even an i5 is typically overkill today. What kind of workloads will these run?

                  I totally agree. Bottlenecks are hardly ever the cpu, they are almost always disk and memory. I have been going round and round with my management on this. They buy I7's but a mix of 5400/7200 hard drives. The i5 would be just fine for general use.

                  I have been buying SSDs, for users, exclusively, for about 6 months and it is by far the most noticeable improvement. Period.

                  It's the one big leap we've had in the past fifteen years.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • jmooreJ
                    jmoore @wrx7m
                    last edited by

                    @wrx7m said in Intel CPU question:

                    @jmoore said in Intel CPU question:

                    @reid-cooper said in Intel CPU question:

                    Even an i5 is typically overkill today. What kind of workloads will these run?

                    I totally agree. Bottlenecks are hardly ever the cpu, they are almost always disk and memory. I have been going round and round with my management on this. They buy I7's but a mix of 5400/7200 hard drives. The i5 would be just fine for general use.

                    I have been buying SSDs, for users, exclusively, for about 6 months and it is by far the most noticeable improvement. Period.

                    I have personally been using SSDs for several years after the amazement of the massive performance increase. Nothing has improved performance so dramatically in the past 15+ years like SSDs.

                    Yep your absolutely right

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      I must be on seven years of SSD now. I could never go back.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • brandon220B
                        brandon220
                        last edited by

                        I've spoiled myself with 16G of RAM and SSDs. I could never go back either.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • nadnerBN
                          nadnerB
                          last edited by

                          IMO, an i-5 is fine for an office plodder and an i-7 is hard to justify.
                          Now with Coffee Lake dragging i-3 up to a quad core, that's where my recommendations for new PC's is going. (next year some time).

                          @reid-cooper said in Intel CPU question:

                          8GB, i5, SSD... tends to do the trick.

                          ^ that's what we're running and no complaints.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • J
                            JackCPickup
                            last edited by

                            i7 has higher clock speeds, larger cache, and Hyper-Threading. Unless your applications can use Hyper-Threading there's no reason to consider i7

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @JackCPickup
                              last edited by

                              @jackcpickup said in Intel CPU question:

                              i7 has higher clock speeds, larger cache, and Hyper-Threading. Unless your applications can use Hyper-Threading there's no reason to consider i7

                              i5 has hyperthreading, doesn't it?

                              J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • J
                                JackCPickup @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in Intel CPU question:

                                @jackcpickup said in Intel CPU question:

                                i7 has higher clock speeds, larger cache, and Hyper-Threading. Unless your applications can use Hyper-Threading there's no reason to consider i7

                                i5 has hyperthreading, doesn't it?

                                Nope. i3 and i7 do. That's why i5 are so popular for gamers, games mostly don't utilise it

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @JackCPickup
                                  last edited by

                                  @jackcpickup said in Intel CPU question:

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Intel CPU question:

                                  @jackcpickup said in Intel CPU question:

                                  i7 has higher clock speeds, larger cache, and Hyper-Threading. Unless your applications can use Hyper-Threading there's no reason to consider i7

                                  i5 has hyperthreading, doesn't it?

                                  Nope. i3 and i7 do. That's why i5 are so popular for gamers, games mostly don't utilise it

                                  Interesting, never realized that.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    I mean I knew that games couldn't use it, I meant about HT in the i5.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • M
                                      marcinozga
                                      last edited by

                                      Get a different machine for the CAD user, he'll be taxing CPU and GPU heavily. Get him Xeon workstation if you can, ideally something that's certified by CAD vendor. You'd be surprised how quickly they are to blame non-certified hardware if there are any issues with their software.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                      • 1
                                      • 2
                                      • 3
                                      • 2 / 3
                                      • First post
                                        Last post