AMD Naples server platform.
-
Spotted the server side of AMD's new architecture. The raw numbers look good, but HotHardWare only had AMD's own performance review, which was obviously a 1 sided performance comparison... AMD didn't even put the same amount of memory in both systems.
I really want to see the performance comparison from a non-biased source.
The CPUs are 32 core/64 thread, 8 memory channels (16 total memory slots), and 128 lanes of PCIe per chip. Should be able to put massive amounts of workloads on those things... we'll see.
-
I'm surprised a super high power eight core chip is not their first one out of the gate, basically a high cache version of their desktop chip.
-
If these perform like expected, these are going to be the darlings of cloud hosting.
-
It's going to be interesting when all the marketing wank gets swept away and someone benchmarks these things for real.
-
Their gaming/ws cpus were benched already, slower than comparable Intel's by about 10%.
-
@momurda said in AMD Naples server platform.:
Their gaming/ws cpus were benched already, slower than comparable Intel's by about 10%.
I heard the opposite, 10% faster. Who did the benchmarks that came out slower?
-
-
@momurda said in AMD Naples server platform.:
ARS
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2017/03/amd-ryzen-review/Ah I see, gaming it is behind, specifically behind quad core procs because the threading isn't leveraged. But for business stuff, it's rocking it looks like.
-
The Ryzen results bode well for Naples.
