DNS issues on 2003 network
-
Can you post the TCP/IP settings from the machine you are having an issue with?
-
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@coliver said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
netstat -an | findstr /I "udp" | findstr "53"
The only machines that aren't working are the file server and print server. Everything else connected correctly. Am I doing this on the domain controller or problem server?
On the problem server check and see if there are static DNS servers defined. That would be my guess.
The IP's are correct
Erm, is the .16 a DNS? Same host?
.16 is DNS. It's the domain controller
Good to know. How about the configuration of the problem servers.
-
@BRRABill said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
Can you post the TCP/IP settings from the machine you are having an issue with?
File Server
Print Server
-
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@BRRABill said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
Can you post the TCP/IP settings from the machine you are having an issue with?
File Server
Print Server
Need the DNS data ipconfig /all or go through the details pane like you did previously.
-
Sorry, I mean the same screenshot as you posted for the DC.
-
At least everything is on the same subnet... to sum up:
- You can ping the .16 from .23 and .36 and vice-versa
- You can not use "nslookup somehostname 192.168.10.16"
-
Print Server
File Server
-
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
At least everything is on the same subnet... to sum up:
- You can ping the .16 from .23 and .36 and vice-versa
- You can not use "nslookup somehostname 192.168.10.16"
I can't nslookup from .23 or .36, .16 is my domain controller.
Can't ping .16 from either
-
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
At least everything is on the same subnet... to sum up:
- You can ping the .16 from .23 and .36 and vice-versa
- You can not use "nslookup somehostname 192.168.10.16"
I can't nslookup from .23 or .36, .16 is my domain controller
And you CAN nslookup from everything else? Like the DC itself or your PC?
-
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
At least everything is on the same subnet... to sum up:
- You can ping the .16 from .23 and .36 and vice-versa
- You can not use "nslookup somehostname 192.168.10.16"
I can't nslookup from .23 or .36, .16 is my domain controller
Could you just try the following from your fileserver please?
nslookup printserver 192.168.10.16
And, just coming to mind: Are there A-records for your file- and printserver in your primary forward lookup zone?
-
@BRRABill said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
At least everything is on the same subnet... to sum up:
- You can ping the .16 from .23 and .36 and vice-versa
- You can not use "nslookup somehostname 192.168.10.16"
I can't nslookup from .23 or .36, .16 is my domain controller
And you CAN nslookup from everything else? Like the DC itself or your PC?
Yes
-
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
At least everything is on the same subnet... to sum up:
- You can ping the .16 from .23 and .36 and vice-versa
- You can not use "nslookup somehostname 192.168.10.16"
I can't nslookup from .23 or .36, .16 is my domain controller
Could you just try the following from your fileserver please?
nslookup printserver 192.168.10.16
And, just coming to mind: Are there A-records for your file- and printserver in your primary forward lookup zone?
-
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
At least everything is on the same subnet... to sum up:
- You can ping the .16 from .23 and .36 and vice-versa
- You can not use "nslookup somehostname 192.168.10.16"
I can't nslookup from .23 or .36, .16 is my domain controller
Could you just try the following from your fileserver please?
nslookup printserver 192.168.10.16
And, just coming to mind: Are there A-records for your file- and printserver in your primary forward lookup zone?
What about asking your second DC/DNS?
nslookup printserver 192.168.10.55
-
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
At least everything is on the same subnet... to sum up:
- You can ping the .16 from .23 and .36 and vice-versa
- You can not use "nslookup somehostname 192.168.10.16"
I can't nslookup from .23 or .36, .16 is my domain controller
Could you just try the following from your fileserver please?
nslookup printserver 192.168.10.16
And, just coming to mind: Are there A-records for your file- and printserver in your primary forward lookup zone?
What about asking your second DC/DNS?
nslookup printserver 192.168.10.55
Same error
-
Weird. And what about
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8
from your print- or fileserver?
Should look like this:
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8 Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com Address: 8.8.8.8 Nicht autorisierende Antwort: Name: prod.turner.map.fastlylb.net Address: 151.101.36.73 Aliases: www.cnn.com turner.map.fastly.net
-
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
Weird. And what about
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8
from your print- or fileserver?
Should look like this:
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8 Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com Address: 8.8.8.8 Nicht autorisierende Antwort: Name: prod.turner.map.fastlylb.net Address: 151.101.36.73 Aliases: www.cnn.com turner.map.fastly.net
Received the same error. This is from the file server. I will try the print server
-
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
Weird. And what about
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8
from your print- or fileserver?
Should look like this:
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8 Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com Address: 8.8.8.8 Nicht autorisierende Antwort: Name: prod.turner.map.fastlylb.net Address: 151.101.36.73 Aliases: www.cnn.com turner.map.fastly.net
Received the same error.
Any firewall in between? Some local AV with firewall included?
-
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
Weird. And what about
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8
from your print- or fileserver?
Should look like this:
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8 Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com Address: 8.8.8.8 Nicht autorisierende Antwort: Name: prod.turner.map.fastlylb.net Address: 151.101.36.73 Aliases: www.cnn.com turner.map.fastly.net
Received the same error.
Any firewall in between? Some local AV with firewall included?
We use Symantec endpoint protection, but can It really be that? Based on yesterday I can't think of anything that would cause any of those settings to change
-
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
Weird. And what about
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8
from your print- or fileserver?
Should look like this:
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8 Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com Address: 8.8.8.8 Nicht autorisierende Antwort: Name: prod.turner.map.fastlylb.net Address: 151.101.36.73 Aliases: www.cnn.com turner.map.fastly.net
Print server says DNS request timed out.
-
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@wirestyle22 said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
@thwr said in DNS issues on 2003 network:
Weird. And what about
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8
from your print- or fileserver?
Should look like this:
nslookup www.cnn.com 8.8.8.8 Server: google-public-dns-a.google.com Address: 8.8.8.8 Nicht autorisierende Antwort: Name: prod.turner.map.fastlylb.net Address: 151.101.36.73 Aliases: www.cnn.com turner.map.fastly.net
Received the same error.
Any firewall in between? Some local AV with firewall included?
We use Symantec endpoint protection, but can It really be that? Based on yesterday I can't think of anything that would cause any of those settings to change
Of course it can be that! That product is downright famous for doing stuff like this. That should have been mentioned immediately. Is that the problem here? Less than likely. Is it a possibility? Certainly.
You should get that removed, although it's difficult to remove and that's why it is sometimes classified as malware. You would be better off running with the OS' own AV than that. But of course, something like Webroot or Cylance would be far better still. But SEP... not a viable option IMHO.